Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 04:55 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:58 Westbury to Portsmouth Harbour
06:31 Truro to Falmouth Docks
06:52 Par to Newquay
07:15 Falmouth Docks to Truro
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 05:05:27 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Charter trains - more limited destinations?  (Read 5350 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43843



View Profile WWW Email
« on: July 12, 2012, 19:40:10 »

http://www.northwalesweeklynews.co.uk/conwy-county-news/local-conwy-news/2012/07/12/55243-31373645/?

I can remember going on Merrymaker (loco and coaches) to Llandudno, and many other places.  Sad to see the suggestion that Llandudno might not be an available destination in the future, or is this just both sides posturing for some sort of negotiation?

As a side issue - where can loco hauled specials / charters still go in the South West?   YES to Penzance and Kingswear. Yes to Minehead.  Yes to Weymouth.   Any others - how about Newquay?
« Last Edit: July 13, 2012, 01:36:54 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 12, 2012, 22:01:56 »

Limits are usually just dependant on where the locomotives and stock are cleared too and the pathing of the train. Newquay is possible, and indeed a railtour ran there just a couple of years ago but because the passenger service uses the line quite close to capacity in the daytime running at more unusual times is necessary, the tour to Newquay ran on a Sunday, at that time there were no trains on a Sunday to Newquay. The St Ives branch was also traversed by the same tour, on a Sunday morning before the start of passenger service, and the Falmouth branch on a Saturday evening once the half-hourly service had stopped.

A similar situation to that at Llandudno is the Cambrian Line to Pwhelli. The new ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System. A future railway signalling system, with equipment located in the driver's cab, rather than at the lineside) signalling system has been commissioned recently on the line and it has limited the length of one of the passing loops on what is mainly a single track line. As such it has become impossible to run a train longer than 6 carriages to Pwhelli, a very unpopular decision as until the installation of the ERTMS system the line used to have regular steam trains in the Summer which were very popular and beneficial for the towns along the line.
Logged
6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2754



View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: July 13, 2012, 06:48:11 »

Okehampton, heathfield, marsh Barton, gunislake,cattle down, mooreswater looe, (pretty much in order of most likely.... One was booked for Barnstaple last year bit never happened due to weight restrictions
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2012, 11:06:28 »

Prior to ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System. A future railway signalling system, with equipment located in the driver's cab, rather than at the lineside) the Cambrian line also had limits on the traction that could travel over it. I believe the biggest problem was Barmouth Bridge.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2012, 11:45:14 »

Another case of reducing the utility of the railway because "It costs too much".

Rather than say it costs too much to provide for a 10 coach train at Llandudno why not run more 10 coach excursions to the resort? That would paty for the runround and give an economic boost to the town. Everyone's a winner.
Logged
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: July 13, 2012, 14:59:08 »

Prior to ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System. A future railway signalling system, with equipment located in the driver's cab, rather than at the lineside) the Cambrian line also had limits on the traction that could travel over it. I believe the biggest problem was Barmouth Bridge.
Indeed, but even the limits on that had been relaxed a little. The notoriously heavy Class 67s were allowed over Barmouth Bridge not long before ERTMS came in. At the moment the only locomotives that can run over the Cambrian Line are Network Rails fleet of ERTMS fitted Class 97/3s, basically Class 37s.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 13, 2012, 15:01:23 »

Guess that's to do with axle load. Six better than four.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: July 13, 2012, 18:52:29 »

Guess that's to do with axle load. Six better than four.
is purely due to the ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System. A future railway signalling system, with equipment located in the driver's cab, rather than at the lineside) why not much can go on the Cambrian lines any more, anything that goes there must have the ERTMS cab signalling and only the 97's and Arriva 158's have it fitted, most things can go there but must be piloted by a 97.
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: July 15, 2012, 12:13:36 »

The new ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System. A future railway signalling system, with equipment located in the driver's cab, rather than at the lineside) signalling system has been commissioned recently on the line and it has limited the length of one of the passing loops on what is mainly a single track line. As such it has become impossible to run a train longer than 6 carriages to Pwhelli, a very unpopular decision as until the installation of the ERTMS system the line used to have regular steam trains in the Summer which were very popular and beneficial for the towns along the line.
I thought there have been several attempts (with no joy yet) to try and make a portable ERTMS device to allow the steam service to operate. I would be supprised if they would put this effort in if the maximum length of the train had really been reduced to six coaches.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 15, 2012, 17:41:26 »

The six coaches limit is something that has come up recently, hence Spitfire's tour to Pwhelli recently was diverted to Aberystwyth instead. There has been talk of a portable ERTMS (European Rail Traffic Management System. A future railway signalling system, with equipment located in the driver's cab, rather than at the lineside) device for years but I'm not aware of any progress on one yet.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page