Lee
|
 |
« on: November 27, 2007, 15:24:02 » |
|
From the FGW▸ website :
15:50 Exmouth to Paignton due 17:13 This train has run short formed with 2 carriages.This is due to an earlier train fault.
17:19 Paignton to Exmouth due 18:46 This train will run short formed with 2 carriages.This is due to an earlier train fault.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 27, 2007, 16:17:42 » |
|
They have spare stock (142's) and crew must be trained by now so why not use them?  A 142 is better than short formed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 27, 2007, 17:00:00 » |
|
2v3 is nothing major, i've been on that train 1v3.
Choas!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Conner
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 27, 2007, 18:04:41 » |
|
2v3 is nothing major, i've been on that train 1v3.
Choas!
That one may be okay but what happens if the school trains are one carriage.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2007, 21:50:14 » |
|
2v3 is nothing major, i've been on that train 1v3.
Choas!
I thought all Devon MEtro were currently booked 2 car
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cheers Jim  AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
|
|
|
Conner
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 28, 2007, 08:01:50 » |
|
2v3 is nothing major, i've been on that train 1v3.
Choas!
I thought all Devon MEtro were currently booked 2 car There is a couple of 153's that attach/deattach to the busy services, but the 153's often end up running by themselves.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Jim
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2007, 15:18:27 » |
|
2v3 is nothing major, i've been on that train 1v3.
Choas!
I thought all Devon MEtro were currently booked 2 car There is a couple of 153's that attach/deattach to the busy services, but the 153's often end up running by themselves. Complain enough and it might change with any luck...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Cheers Jim  AG's most famous quote "It'll be better next week"
|
|
|
Conner
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 28, 2007, 16:07:47 » |
|
2v3 is nothing major, i've been on that train 1v3.
Choas!
I thought all Devon MEtro were currently booked 2 car There is a couple of 153's that attach/deattach to the busy services, but the 153's often end up running by themselves. Complain enough and it might change with any luck... Doesn't directly affect me just when I have been oh holiday there a couple of times and have noticed it.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 28, 2007, 16:56:18 » |
|
Not sure what this Devon metro tosh is, but...
The 'Triangle (of doom)' as better known is a difficult one as some parts of the route need extra capacity at x whilst need very little at y.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lee
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 29, 2007, 14:47:48 » |
|
Not sure what this Devon metro tosh is, but...
Apparently the name has been used for promotion purposes in the past.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
devon_metro
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 29, 2007, 17:19:22 » |
|
Not seen any promotions! Feel free to direct me to em 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lee
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 29, 2007, 17:22:19 » |
|
Not seen any promotions! Feel free to direct me to em  I am told that it was in a newspaper a while back. Unfortunately I dont have a link , but I will check further when I have a moment.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Lee
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 29, 2007, 17:33:06 » |
|
Not sure what this Devon metro tosh is, but...
The 'Triangle (of doom)' as better known is a difficult one as some parts of the route need extra capacity at x whilst need very little at y.
Here is a quote from this very forum : Tarka▸ Line Timetable: December 2007 would be virtually unchanged. From May 2008 there will be an additional Mon-Sat train - 0940 from Barnstaple - and they are looking at the possibility of an 1140 as well, although that's by no means certain. They will also look again at providing a standard-hour timetable around Exeter with a Devon Metro (which is exactly what Wessex called it in 2003...)
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: August 10, 2011, 06:06:57 » |
|
Also, direct link to .pdf at http://www.devon.gov.uk/eldf-devonmetroappraisal.pdfWhen they Talk about Capacity issues between Exeter Central and St Davids Railway Station, why just they don't terminate trains at Central Using Platform 1.
I would guess that the answer is "because it means that passengers arriving on the terminating train who are connecting on to other long distance destinations would have an extra change and an extra wait, which would lead to a significant drop off in their custom". Can anyone confirm this? A similar question might be asked about terminating trains that are inbound to Edinburgh Waverley at Haymarket, and on the TransWilts there's been the question at the north end - "Chippenham or Swindon?" and at the south end "Warminster or Salisbury"? There's an excellent (negative) case against terminating short if you look at Dilton Marsh to Salisbury traffic; there's a surprisingly high potential flow from what's now a station set between two major housing / commuter areas to the biggest place in the council area, but the wait at Warminster on many services is pretty discouraging, with four of the nine Monday to Friday trains requiring a change there, and in three cases there not being an ongoing connection for over 45 minutes. Northbound it's a bit better; in 4 cases the wait is only about 25 minutes, and the other 5 are shorter or through trains.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
|