Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:55 15 Apr 2025
 
- Iraq sandstorm leaves many with breathing problems
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - End, Rail Future consultation
today - Everything Electric
tomorrow - Walk from Chetnole
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury

On this day
15th Apr (1959)
~ Introduction of first Motor Luggage Van (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:25 Gunnislake to Plymouth
07:34 Redhill to Reading
08:24 Plymouth to Gunnislake
09:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
09:19 Gunnislake to Plymouth
10:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
12:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
14:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
16:21 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:03 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 15, 2025, 07:55:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[170] More than half of train travellers now use the railway for lei...
[137] Single scheme needed? So people know to show xtra consideratio...
[84] Spreading wings for a few days
[46] Plym Valley Railway - Marsh Mills to Plym Bridge - merged post...
[29] "Long Products"... Steel Rail.
[28] Great Western Railway: on-board catering, buffets, Travelling ...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: A new image - or a new set of images?  (Read 16829 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 22, 2012, 18:36:47 »

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/pickle/ref_89.jpg

HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) hide and seek?  Grin

http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/pickle/ref_98.jpg

Pangbourne?
« Last Edit: April 22, 2012, 18:55:35 by bignosemac » Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43819



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #16 on: April 22, 2012, 20:10:07 »

Yes, Pangbourne.   And the "hide and seek" is between Thingley Junction and Beanacre.  I put that in to represent "trains in the environment" - I suspect we may have some issues with electrification equipment changing the look of some historic sites such as the entrance to Box tunnel for even.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10230



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 23, 2012, 11:01:51 »

Yes I must admit I am not looking forward to seeing the wires going through such places as Box Tunnel or over Maidenhead Bridge - but that is the price of progress.  As for Beanacre and Melksham there are already quite a few overhead wires - just that the voltage is a bit high to run trains!  Grin
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43819



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #18 on: April 23, 2012, 11:39:08 »

Oh - you mean this  Grin :

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10230



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 23, 2012, 12:10:04 »

That's the ones - and if you take a train from Reading to Basingstoke you can see the other end of some of the cable runs at Bramley!
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: April 23, 2012, 12:17:16 »

While OHLE can be an eyesore, I've also seen OHLE that doesn't really damage the view very much. I hope they are very careful with the design of the GWML (Great Western Main Line) OHLE so it isn't an eyesore.

The very high voltage power lines, and their associated pylons more so, as posted by bobm, however are always horrid.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 23, 2012, 18:23:24 »

The very high voltage power lines, and their associated pylons more so, as posted by bobm, however are always horrid.

But they bring the juice to you to enable you to run a device to post on this forum. And no doubt do lots of other things. I'm assuming you're not powering your home fully from renewables or a diesel generator.

It's a trade off. We could have high voltage power lines buried in the ground but the costs of doing that are prohibitive. Both the initial capital costs and the maintenance. Cost which will be borne by the end consumer.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: April 23, 2012, 20:36:17 »

I'm assuming you're not powering your home fully from renewables
Sometimes we are, depends how sunny/windy it is Wink

There aren't any pylons around here though, electricity is carried on those things which are like slightly-taller telegraph poles with a horizontal bar on top. While they are a little unsightly sometimes, they are much better than pylons. Where a row of pylons is necessary, they could at least design them better. Where there are so many cables that you have a double-row of pylons, might there be a case for burrying?
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 23, 2012, 20:58:17 »

Durham Viaduct looks ok with juice.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19304



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 24, 2012, 07:35:29 »

There aren't any pylons around here though, electricity is carried on those things which are like slightly-taller telegraph poles with a horizontal bar on top. While they are a little unsightly sometimes, they are much better than pylons.

That'd be local distribution. You wouldn't want 400kV or 275kV on a wooden pole!
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4522


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 24, 2012, 20:09:00 »

Where a row of pylons is necessary, they could at least design them better. Where there are so many cables that you have a double-row of pylons, might there be a case for burrying?

I thought that was the purpose of the recent competition run by National Grid.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page