Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:55 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
07:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
Delayed
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:52 London Paddington to Hereford
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 12:36 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 12:07:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[141] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[83] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[66] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[32] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
[31] Thumpers for Dummies
[23] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Turning railways into roads - The beginning of the end?  (Read 3134 times)
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« on: March 15, 2012, 20:03:12 »

Remember this? :

Half a century after Kingskerswell bypass - linking Torbay to Newton Abbot - was first planned, Devon County Council and Torbay Council have put forward a funding scheme bid (link below.)
http://thisisdevon.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=143632&command=displayContent&sourceNode=142719&contentPK=19388152&folderPk=91672&pNodeId=201778

The project was submitted for approval to the Department for Transport this week, with a revised cost expected to be as high as ^129.9 million.

One alternative that was put forward involved using the Holdfast method to allow cars and trains to share the railway corridor linking Torbay to Newton Abbot. Here are some quotes from a Times article on this :

Quote
^Unlike ordinary roads, there is no problem with potholes because a damaged panel can easily be replaced. Rather than have an endless debate about whether we should be investing in road or rail, we can allow trains and cars to use the same corridor.^

"Holdfast, which has installed its rubber panels at hundreds of level crossings, has held discussions with tram companies about converting lines for dual use. ^There are many lines which would be too lightly used to justify restoring rail services but which would be commercially viable if cars could use them too,^ he added.

The cost of reopening a line could be covered by charging drivers a toll to use it.

Holdfast has calculated that the cost of installing rubber panels on the seven-mile line between Newton Abbot and Torquay in Devon could be recouped within four years by charging cars ^1 each.

Holdfast has drawn up a list of dozens of potential lines and believes the strongest candidates for rubber highways are in Dagenham, East London, Croydon, Cheltenham and several routes around Bristol.

Iain Coucher, deputy chief executive of Network Rail, which owns Britain^s 20,000 miles of track, said: ^It is an interesting idea and we are looking at it.^ "

Well...

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Rubber mats laid on railway at Stromeferry

The first batch of rubber mats have been laid alongside tracks at Stromeferry in Wester Ross to allow road traffic onto the railway.

Highland Council is having the material called HoldFast installed to ease travel in the area.

A stretch of the A890 has been shut since December following landslides.

Traffic will be allowed onto the nearby railway when there are no trains passing through and until the risk of further slides is reduced.

The A890 helps to connect Lochcarron to Plockton, and its high school, and eventually with Kyle, on the opposite site of Loch Carron.

The road runs across the top of the sea loch to link up with the A896, the main road to Lochcarron.

To make the journey by road at the moment involves drivers having to take a 140-mile (225km) diversion, instead of the usual 18 miles (29km) from Lochcarron to Plockton.

The small car ferry has been running between North and South Strome since January, while a seal-watching boat has been ferrying schoolchildren.

No good will come from setting this precedent me hearties, I warns ye...
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 15, 2012, 22:27:41 »

Will sime idiotic road users behave like they do a level crossings.    No brainer.
Logged
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: March 28, 2012, 23:11:47 »

The trouble is that in the North of Scotland it actually seems like a good idea supposing they can work out how to some idiot driver playing chicken with the train. You know how the locals love racing you to passing places on single track roads.

One of the problems I can see is how do get two lanes of traffic on a single line railway or is the length short enough to be one way working? Then you could have traffic lights to control cars and the train would put both sets to red and get an indication they were both red (like AHB indication). Pluss CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) monitoring or even a signalman to control the section.

There are acouple of bridges in NZ where car and rail share!
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2012, 15:25:29 »

........absolute rubbish.  The railway comes to the rescue again Grin http://www.signalbox.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=4020
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43076



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: March 31, 2012, 19:23:50 »

Picture at http://www.flickr.com/photos/highlandcouncil/6874187696/lightbox/ shows the length - about 100 metres.  It could equate it to a long level crossing (such as Red Cow / Exeter) with both entrance and exit on the same side - and certainly ample for single, alternate way working for road traffic. But I understand Lee's concern at the possible replacement of rail services by road services - of this being used as a possible precedent /proving case.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 31, 2012, 19:28:32 »


This isn't exactly new. City tramways did it quite safely for years and still do in favoured towns. Clearances, braking distances and sight lines need to be checked as do top speeds which probably means special rail vehicles.

Otherwise it's only Diesel LRT.

OTC

Logged
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 31, 2012, 20:24:52 »

Lets not forget that the Kyle line doesnt have the most intesive service in the UK (United Kingdom) either!
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page