Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:55 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:58 Westbury to Portsmouth Harbour
06:31 Truro to Falmouth Docks
06:52 Par to Newquay
07:15 Falmouth Docks to Truro
Additional 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 07:06:55 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 831241 times)
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5674



View Profile
« Reply #990 on: July 19, 2017, 13:37:25 »

I must admit to never having heard the term 'steerage' used for rail fares, only as an old shipping phrase.  Was it ever used as an official ticket class by any of the operators?
.

AFAIK ('as far as I know') it was never an official railway term, but has come into slang or informal use relatively recently, generally used by those who feel that "standard class" sounds too good to accurately describe what is actually provided.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #991 on: July 19, 2017, 14:03:12 »

AFAIK ('as far as I know') it was never an official railway term, but has come into slang or informal use relatively recently, generally used by those who feel that "standard class" sounds too good to accurately describe what is actually provided.
I expect though, that we'd almost never see the word steerage if you were to stop using it...

Paul

Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #992 on: July 19, 2017, 14:11:40 »

As someone who has in recent years predominately travelled first class, I would avoid the use of steerage to describe standard class, as I feel it could be construed as rather condescending to those who travel standard, (particularly given the type of passenger that would have travelled steerage on the steamships of old).
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #993 on: July 20, 2017, 10:20:01 »

Testing commenced on the Cotswold Line last night, slightly curtailed on what was planned, but two IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) sets reached Worcester for the first time.  Another run scheduled for tonight.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #994 on: July 20, 2017, 10:23:25 »

The IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) was a 10 car set 800006 & 800005
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 513


View Profile
« Reply #995 on: July 20, 2017, 11:42:54 »

Testing commenced on the Cotswold Line last night, slightly curtailed on what was planned, but two IET (Intercity Express Train - replacement for HSTs (manufactured by Hitachi in Kobe, Japan)) sets reached Worcester for the first time.  Another run scheduled for tonight.

Is this tonight's test train http://www.realtimetrains.co.uk/train/K00418/2017/07/20/advanced ? If it is, then also going to Reading, Newbury and Westbury, and then back to Bristol.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #996 on: July 20, 2017, 12:07:58 »

Yes, that's the one.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 753


View Profile
« Reply #997 on: July 20, 2017, 14:39:59 »

I note that the “Introducing the New Trains” section on the GWR (Great Western Railway) website no longer includes any claims about improved journey times as a benefit of the new IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.)’s.  As has been said previously by several of us, GWR will be struggling to get a similar positive reaction to IEP’s replacing HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units))’s as it is doing with 387’s replacing Turbos.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #998 on: July 20, 2017, 14:45:13 »

If everyone gets a seat out of Paddington regularly they *might*.....
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5674



View Profile
« Reply #999 on: July 20, 2017, 14:50:04 »

With todays announcement that most planned electrification is cancelled, and with passenger numbers still growing rapidly, perhaps the time has come to lengthen some of the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) ?

Adding an extra powered vehicle to a 9 car set would provide significant extra passenger capacity and also slightly improve performance since the HP per tonne would be slightly increased.

A more radical proposal would be to lengthen some of the 5 car units to 9 or 10 car, increasing the percentage of powered vehicles would improve performance and the extra capacity would be most welcome.

A perhaps TOO radical proposal would be to build extra vehicles that contain no engine but instead have a battery and traction motors with a similar power output. The battery would supply peak power for acceleration and ascending inclines and would be idled when this power was not needed. The battery would be charged from the other engines when coasting, moving slowly or stopped.

Note that none of these proposals involve any modifications to vehicles already built or ordered, they would be additional.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #1000 on: July 20, 2017, 15:02:56 »

Adding an extra powered vehicle to a 9 car set

Diesel or electric or bi-mode?
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #1001 on: July 20, 2017, 20:23:02 »

With todays announcement that most planned electrification is cancelled, and with passenger numbers still growing rapidly, perhaps the time has come to lengthen some of the IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) ?

SNIPPED!

I understood that the latest figures showed a slight decrease in rail travel in London and the south east. Not all of this is attributable to TSGN's problems.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #1002 on: July 20, 2017, 20:55:45 »

TSGNs?!
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1003 on: July 20, 2017, 22:00:01 »

TSGNs?!
Took me a few seconds to decode, but I think that was meant to be Thameslink, Southern, Great Northern (TSGN) who obviously have been having trouble due to trying (along with the DfT» (Department for Transport - about)???) to enforce driver-only operation which has caused many canceled trains and hence caused passenger numbers to fall in south east England.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #1004 on: July 20, 2017, 23:17:13 »

Todays announcement comes just days after HMG announced the go ahead of HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) then why not cancel HS2 and invest the money in completing the previously committed electrification projects. I am no economist but it does not make sense to me to go ahead with HS2 and HAVING to borrow the whole cost of that project thus lumbering our children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren, great-great-grandchildren et al with having to repay the loans and interest thereon for this vanity project. Will we see all the bridges constructed, embankments built, cuttings gouged out, tunnels bored, electrification masts erected and OHLE (Over-Head Line Equipment (electrification via catenary)) wires installed only to be informed by HMG in, what 2022, that the project is so expensive that the trackbed will not be ballasted and thus no sleepers will be laid without which the rails that the HS2 trains will run on will cease to exist and thus the project will be converted into a HIGH SPEED INTER CITY METROBUST road.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 65 66 [67] 68 69 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page