Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:55 19 Apr 2025
 
- British man, 27, killed by avalanche in French Alps
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:58 Westbury to Portsmouth Harbour
06:52 Par to Newquay
07:15 Falmouth Docks to Truro
Additional 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
07:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:27 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
08:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
10:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
11:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
15:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
17:06 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 07:12:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[147] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[111] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[97] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[81] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
[44] Melksham's rail service - where are we, on the anniversary of ...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 78
  Print  
Author Topic: Intercity Express Programme (IEP) - ongoing discussion  (Read 831258 times)
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1454


View Profile
« Reply #585 on: July 14, 2015, 09:50:31 »

At weekends if I can't reserve in advance it usually is an upgrade to first class. As I have said before I will never stand on a train; I've seen what can happen to those that do.
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #586 on: July 14, 2015, 12:40:39 »

Not sure if it's appropriate to post this in the 'Meet the Manager' board, so I'm posting here instead (from "Question 4 for Ben Rule - 19.36 - The future between Exeter and Plymouth" topic):

Which prompts me to ask about the expectations for SET (Super Express Train (now IET)) operation through Dawlish during periods of severe weather; in the past HSTs (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) handled the conditions much better than the Voyagers which on the face of it are not dissimilar to the SETs.
The SETs will only run between Paddington - Newbury, Oxford, Bristol and South Wales. They won't go near Dawlish.
That is an interesting comment, does this mean IC125 retention is confirmed and the additional new trains order (for trains which are basicly SETs with larger fuel tanks) is not going ahead? And does this mean Network Rail is able to de-scope the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) route clearance programme, which had Plymouth and Paignton as core routes and the lines beyond to Newquay and Penzance as non-core parts of the programme? Also, the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) draft diagrams showed IEP services to Paignton, if everything through Dawlish is going to be existing stock then maybe that's how FirstGW intend to ensure everything on the IEP routes that needs to be is at least 9 coaches.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #587 on: July 14, 2015, 13:36:01 »

Has Ben replied as thinking SETs (Super Express Train (now IET)) mean 'electric's?.....coz bi-modes will certainly reach Exeter/Plymouth....so would it be better to refer to them under their Class number? 800/801?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43846



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #588 on: July 14, 2015, 14:11:36 »

Has Ben replied as thinking SETs (Super Express Train (now IET)) mean 'electric's?.....

I think, yes, he has written for electric operation / units ... think Weston-super-mare, think Cheltenham Spa when you read his answer.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
DidcotPunter
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 166


View Profile Email
« Reply #589 on: July 15, 2015, 09:39:30 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) report on IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) testing at Old Dalby in Leicestershire

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-33533467
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5674



View Profile
« Reply #590 on: July 30, 2015, 13:42:46 »

Where will surfboards be held in the summer on Newquay services?

Irrelevant in the near future.  As discussed many times previously, IEPs (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) are not going to be used on the Devon and Cornwall services.

Paul

The above was no doubt true when posted but it has now been confirmed that far West services are to be downgraded to new and mainly much shorter DMUs (Diesel Multiple Unit) of a similar design to the IEPs.
So how are surfboards and other bulky holiday luggage to be carried ?
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13322


View Profile Email
« Reply #591 on: July 30, 2015, 13:48:06 »

The lay-outs of these additionals (anyone know the class? 802s?) may or may not follow the same as the 800/801s....as the ok has just been given, my guess is that the uinterior design has not yet been fixced in stone.
Logged
patch38
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 655


View Profile
« Reply #592 on: August 07, 2015, 16:39:24 »

Some interesting footage of Class 800 delivery/test moves here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3A4d_qtuRJs
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10450


View Profile
« Reply #593 on: August 07, 2015, 17:16:30 »

Thanks for the link.

Stop it at 8'14" and you get an impression of just how long a 10-car formation is!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #594 on: August 07, 2015, 18:36:48 »

Looooooong isn't it! Brakes sounded like a Class 180.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5674



View Profile
« Reply #595 on: August 08, 2015, 09:45:54 »

Last nights fiasco (large scale signalling failure, thousands delayed, some passengers passed out due to heat and crowding) has got me thinking about how robust is the specification for the air conditioning on the new trains.

Is it required to work even in adverse conditions, with a substantial penalty payable for failures ? or is it considered "nice to have, sometimes it works and sometimes it does not" ? as is the case with class 158s/159s

I would hope that the specification is watertight without wiggle room about "it was too hot outside" or the famous "the train was overcrowded and the system was not designed for that"

A sensible specification would be along the lines of "the passenger saloon must be reliably cooled to a temperature not exceeding 23 degrees under the following conditions.
External air temperature of 45 degrees with 80% relative humidity.
No wind combined with intense sunlight.
Train not moving.
Passenger numbers at 140% of the seating capacity."

Does anyone know how watertight the actual specification is ?
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7425


View Profile
« Reply #596 on: August 08, 2015, 10:03:37 »

Last nights fiasco (large scale signalling failure, thousands delayed, some passengers passed out due to heat and crowding) has got me thinking about how robust is the specification for the air conditioning on the new trains.

Is it required to work even in adverse conditions, with a substantial penalty payable for failures ? or is it considered "nice to have, sometimes it works and sometimes it does not" ? as is the case with class 158s/159s

I would hope that the specification is watertight without wiggle room about "it was too hot outside" or the famous "the train was overcrowded and the system was not designed for that"

A sensible specification would be along the lines of "the passenger saloon must be reliably cooled to a temperature not exceeding 23 degrees under the following conditions.
External air temperature of 45 degrees with 80% relative humidity.
No wind combined with intense sunlight.
Train not moving.
Passenger numbers at 140% of the seating capacity."

Does anyone know how watertight the actual specification is ?

The performance is largely specified by reference to BS EN 13129-1:2002. Some items are stated in the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) specification, notably:
Quote
TS1620 The HVAC performance of the saloon of the IEP Vehicle must be calculated on the basis of an interior layout which includes a minimum of 90 seats in the saloon, with a Fully Laden load. Additionally the HVAC system must ensure sufficient air quality for the safe carriage of passengers when loaded to the Crush Laden Condition.

I can't see anything that says what "sufficient air quality" means, though it could be defined in an Act somewhere. As to "Crush Laden Condition", that is defined as:
Quote
TS1890 Crush Laden Load:
Means the IEP Train in Tare Condition plus a passenger load of all seats occupied with further standee passenger numbers equivalent to 4 passengers per m2 of available standing space (in accordance with ^long distance^ category as detailed in table 3 of BS EN15663:2009 ^Railway applications. Definition of vehicle reference masses^). The mass of each passenger (which shall include that passenger^s luggage) shall be assumed to be 80kg (in accordance with ^long distance^ category as detailed in table 3 of BS EN 15663:2009 ^Railway applications. Definition of vehicle reference masses^). A mass of 300kg/m2 shall also be assumed for luggage compartments as defined in BS EN15663:2009 ^Railway applications. Definition of vehicle reference masses^.

Reliability and penalties are not in the technical spec. - they must be in the contract, which is not (AFAIK ('as far as I know')) public.
« Last Edit: September 03, 2015, 18:17:18 by stuving » Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6642


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #597 on: September 03, 2015, 18:14:05 »

Rail News reports the opening of the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) factory:

Quote
'Momentous occasion' as Intercity Express factory opens

THE new plant where hundreds of new rail vehicles are to be assembled for intercity and urban services in England, Scotland and Wales has been opened today.

The ^82 million factory at Newton Aycliffe in Country Durham is owned by Hitachi, which is a key member of the consortium Agility Trains.

Agility won contracts to build two fleets of Intercity Express trains for the East Coast and Great Western Main Lines, although the introduction of the GW» (Great Western - used as an abbreviation for the area / lines under the Great Western franchise, as opposed to FGW which includes "First", the company operating them too. For tickets - about) in two or three years from now is bogged down in controversy as the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) remains in dispute with First Great Western about staffing and on-board catering facilities.

The plant will also produce trains in the Hitachi AT series for the newly electrified route between Glasgow Queen Street and Edinburgh, and for Great Western intercity services between London and stations in Devon and Cornwall.

Hitachi Ltd Chairman and CEO (Chief Executive Officer), Hiroaki Nakanishi, welcomed transport secretary Patrick McLoughlin MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) and rail minister Claire Perry MP, along with over 500 invited guests, to the opening ceremony.

Welcoming the opening, the Prime Minister David Cameron said: ^This massive investment from Hitachi shows confidence in the strength of Britain^s growing economy. This new train facility will not only provide good jobs for working people but will build the next generation of intercity trains, improving travel for commuters and families, as well as strengthening the infrastructure we need to help the UK (United Kingdom) grow.^

Chancellor of the Exchequer George Osborne said: ^Today we see a major boost for the UK with Hitachi investing millions in returning train manufacturing to the North East. This state of the art facility will grow and secure jobs for decades to come and will help us to build the Northern Powerhouse, while at the same time revitalising one of our oldest industries in the region within which this tradition is synonymous.^

Hiroaki Nakanishi of Hitachi added: ^Today is a momentous occasion for Hitachi Rail, Newton Aycliffe and the British rail industry. We have brought train design and manufacturing back home to its birthplace in the North East.^

The Newton Aycliffe plant will be the second major train-building factory in Britain. Bombardier runs the last former British Rail works at Litchurch Lane in Derby, where the Canadian firm is about to construct a fleet of 600 vehicles for Crossrail.
Logged

Now, please!
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #598 on: September 05, 2015, 23:07:10 »

Rail News reports the opening of the IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) factory:

Quote
The plant will also produce trains in the Hitachi AT series for the newly electrified route between Glasgow Queen Street and Edinburgh, and for Great Western intercity services between London and stations in Devon and Cornwall.
Eh? Pretty sure I read somewhere that Hitachi's UK (United Kingdom) assembly plant is going to be fully occupied screwing together trains for the ScotRail and IEP orders and that the Devon/Cornwall AT300 order will therefore be fully-assembled in Japan and shipped as complete trains.
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6642


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #599 on: September 07, 2015, 23:07:41 »

[Eh? Pretty sure I read somewhere that Hitachi's UK (United Kingdom) assembly plant is going to be fully occupied screwing together trains for the ScotRail and IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) orders and that the Devon/Cornwall AT300 order will therefore be fully-assembled in Japan and shipped as complete trains.

I thought you said they were glued together, with something based on rendered down horses.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 78
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page