Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:15 21 Apr 2025
 
- Passengers evacuate Delta plane after engine fire
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
21st Apr (1958)
Battery Multiple Unit enters public service (link)

Train RunningCancelled
17:50 Penzance to London Paddington
20:23 Swansea to London Paddington
20:45 London Paddington to Great Malvern
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
22:16 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:28 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 London Paddington to Bedwyn
22:47 Newbury to Reading
22:52 Reading to Basingstoke
22:53 Didcot Parkway to Reading
22:58 Basingstoke to Reading
22:58 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:01 Henley-On-Thames to Twyford
23:10 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
23:20 Slough to Windsor & Eton Central
23:22 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:23 Basingstoke to Reading
23:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:30 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
23:34 Reading to Basingstoke
Additional 23:36 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
23:45 Slough to Windsor & Eton Central
23:56 Windsor & Eton Central to Slough
22/04/25 00:05 Basingstoke to Reading
Short Run
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
20:00 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:24 Exmouth to Cardiff Central
20:24 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
21:30 Cardiff Central to Frome
22:00 Hereford to London Paddington
22:30 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Delayed
21:15 London Paddington to Oxford
22:31 Didcot Parkway to Banbury
22:45 London Paddington to Port Talbot Parkway
23:07 Oxford to London Paddington
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 22/04/25 00:07 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 21, 2025, 23:25:42 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] Fortuitous connections ... and an App which fails to offer the...
[88] Firstgroup's rail division trading 'ahead of expectations'
[73] Eyesight rules for motorists unsafe, says coroner
[60] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[56] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[53] Yeovil Railway Centre - South chord project
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Protection for on-track workers is good, but is this a strange priority?  (Read 4511 times)
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« on: July 06, 2011, 09:42:19 »

After being away for a few weeks a caught a train yesterday from Bath station.

I noted that in the gap between the tracks (which is extra wide as there used to be an extra line there), there had been built a little gravel path parallel to the down line. 

I assume that this is to give ontrack staff or train crews a safe walking route either during engineering work or to allow crew to change ends.  Now that is not something I would normally object to, but given that before the path was installed there was a already a safe walking route (either use the platform or the clear and level ballast), given that the platform lights mean that this area can be well lit, and given that there are many other parts of the line where there is anything but a safe walking route (there are plenty of places where the lineside is obstructed by vegetation, rubbish, cable, troughing etc that represent a real hazard especially in the dark) it struct me as a strange priority to be spending a safety budget on.

have I missed something?   
Logged
super tm
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 599


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2011, 13:28:56 »

When a full length HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) is in the platform at Bath Spa the drivers cab at the London end of the train can often be over the river bridge.  So a driver changing end via the platform would have a chance of falling in the river !

I agree however that the hand rails look  unnecessary.
Logged
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2011, 17:14:02 »

Thanks for the explanation.  It makes sense I suppose in terms of practciality to provide a better walking route for drivers than maintenance staff.  Is the installation at Bath an indication that there are going to be lots of HST (High Speed Train (Inter City class 43 125 units)) reversals planned at that station? 
Logged
fatcontroller
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 117


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2011, 11:28:15 »

At the moment it is not possible to reverse (change ends) in the down (Bristol-bound) direction.
Over the next few months new signalling is being installed which will allow down direction trains to change ends in the down platform and return back towards Bathampton Jn.

As was previously mentioned with reference to the powercar being on the bridge, that is why the walking route is requried.
Logged

former FGW (First Great Western) Staff now working for the People's republic of ScotRail
Anything I post is my own personal view and not that of FGW, FirstGroup, ScotRail or Transport Scotland.
Anything official from these sources will be marked as such.
Tim
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2738


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 13, 2011, 12:10:06 »

Thanks for the reply.  I understand now.

They seem to be installing similar next to the up line now.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page