Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 16 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Walk from Chetnole
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
16th Apr (1987)
~ Tulyar arrives at Swanley New Barn Railway (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:48 St Erth to St Ives
19:05 St Ives to St Erth
Short Run
23:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Frome
Delayed
14:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 16, 2025, 18:54:47 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[219] 2025 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[80] Spreading wings for a few days
[76] More than half of train travellers now use the railway for lei...
[59] Single scheme needed? So people know to show xtra consideratio...
[56] New Sunday and Bank Holiday buses Axminster station - Seaton -...
[48] Isles of Scilly sea ferry and air services - merged posts
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: ... and you thought HS2 was difficult  (Read 1613 times)
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2137


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« on: November 10, 2024, 07:14:00 »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2n4r9reejo
Not sure about any cost overruns (increased four times original), but progress is slow."Latvia and Estonia have been criticised for building rail terminals before the railway itself" does that make it more difficult to cancel? Although the "scaling back" comments have a certain resemblance to HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)).
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43825



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2024, 07:33:31 »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2n4r9reejo
Not sure about any cost overruns (increased four times original), but progress is slow."Latvia and Estonia have been criticised for building rail terminals before the railway itself" does that make it more difficult to cancel? Although the "scaling back" comments have a certain resemblance to HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)).

Having travelled from the border where the line from Poland comes into Lithuania up to Tallinn earlier this year, I can vouch for the current route being s-l-o-w (and just 1 passenger train a day on some lines).  Rail Baltica would be a game changer assuming there is a people and freight to have their game changed.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 580


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2024, 08:05:00 »

Still not quite as messy and time consuming as the "Basque Y" in Spain which has taken 20+ years and resulted in at least one person getting shot.

IIRC ('if I recall/remember/read correctly') the majority of civils have been competed, but not the track laying, and not the final bit into Bilbao, where passengers will have to change to the metro for a considerable length of time.

Logged
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 675


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2024, 17:25:35 »

Of course the project as approved lost it's most inspirational part, connecting Tallinn in Estonia to Helsinki in Finland by a Russian bypass undersea tunnel under the Gulf of Finland. This was dropped early on due to cost. I suspect if the project was being reconsidered afresh now the dismissal of this might not have been so quickly decided.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page