Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 08 Jan 2025
 
* Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger that diverted flight
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
Delayed
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 20:27:15 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[174] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[82] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[69] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[54] senior railcard
[52] Coastal walks - station to station
[28] Rail Replacement bus - OK, but I prefer the train.
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Some FGW Trains may be more crowded than normal until further notice...  (Read 12063 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: December 03, 2009, 00:34:17 »

From the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) website:

Quote
The RAIB will publish a report, including any recommendations to improve safety, at the conclusion of its investigation. This report will be available on the RAIB website.

I look forward to reading the report sometime in 2011.

Cynical? Moi?  Grin
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: December 03, 2009, 00:43:28 »

Here's an interesting one: back in the "good old days", how long do you think it took to produce a report into the bridge collapse at Glanrhyd, Central Wales Line? This accident was also caused by flooding and claimed the lives of three passengers and the driver.

Report is available at this link http://www.railwaysarchive.co.uk/docSummary.php?docID=397.

So, any idea how long yet?

Well, the accident took place 19 October 1987 but the report's dated 31 January 1990, so took well over two years to see the light of day.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: December 03, 2009, 11:13:16 »

For a complex report anything around a year is good going. If they are straightforward they are much quicker. 

For instance I was reading a report about a fatality on a level crossing, and I think they were checking the visibility after waiting for the very same weather conditions to occur in the vicinity...  That sort of thing has to take time.

Paul
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19083


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #33 on: September 23, 2010, 19:46:15 »

Oh, Ye of little faith ...  Roll Eyes Grin

The Rail Accident Investigation Branch have now published their full report on this incident, on their website:

Quote
Summary

During the evening of Saturday 14 November 2009, the foundations of a Victorian bridge carrying the railway over the River Crane near Feltham in West London failed without warning, causing part of the bridge to subside. The first indication of a problem was a track defect reported by a train driver crossing the bridge on the up line. Track maintenance staff, called to the site, immediately blocked the up line to all traffic when they became aware of a serious defect with the bridge. The down line was blocked shortly afterwards.

A total of 21 trains crossed the failing bridge between the first report and closure of the line. There was no derailment and no injuries occurred.

The RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) have made five recommendations to Network Rail concerning the management of structures, and one recommendation to the Environment Agency concerning notification to railway infrastructure owners when obstructions are found against a structure.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: September 23, 2010, 20:24:32 »

It's an interesting read isn't it.

Those Victorian engineers definitely seem to have missed a trick with the foundations back in 1858...

It seems to me that (as far as they're able to) they hint that the arch might have been partly blocked at the time of the examination by Amey's engineer. 

Anyone else get that implication on reading it?

Paul
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #35 on: September 24, 2010, 11:46:13 »

Totally caused by the blockage in the river causing the flow to dig away at foundations....The Envirnment Agency inspector ought to have alerted Network Rail to the problem, and didn't.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page