Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:55 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
19:15 Paignton to Exmouth
19:25 Exmouth to Paignton
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
Delayed
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 20:55:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: First Great Western named most improved train operator  (Read 8111 times)
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 13, 2010, 12:30:31 »

To be fair to amiddl, he didn't just flag up engineering. He also pointed out areas which most definitely are within FGW (First Great Western)'s remit - catering provision and calling patterns.

Granted, hence why I only picked up on that point. Its a common misconception it seems, however that the problem with the lack of blame in the railway, e.g. cable theft goes does as signalling problems, so the image of the railway is tarnished!

Re: lack of buffets, I think they've started to get on top of it with more micro buffets available now.

With regard to the 12:18 Paddington - Taunton, i suspect it was changed either by request of Network Rail in order to not delay the following 1306 Pad - Ply (which has now been accelerated I believe) or due to the fact the signalling spacing between Castle Cary and Taunton is very poor and the 1306 Plymouth was often catching up the stopping service.
Logged
amiddl
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 199


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 14, 2010, 16:46:51 »

Quote
Engineering work has absolutely nothing to do with FGW (First Great Western)!!

I do understand this - would be very grateful to soemone explaining to me how the relationship works between Network rail and FGW.

From my perspective the supplier doesn't dictate whats on the shelf and I expect FGW to negotiate service patterns that best meet the majority of thier customer needs. I buy my services from FGW and this is what I expect.

Engineering works overnight I can understand - probably few people travelling. Been impressed with the idea  of the Exeter - Plymouth blockages finishing in time for people travelling back after a weekend - yes. Jan - Mar enginnering works two months out of three on the route to the West Country - dont get that. Neither get a all weekend blockage when lots of people travelling this weekend for Mother's day (know that they were - the number of people with flowers travelling yesterday).

How does the Network Rail/FGW relationship work when it comes to planning engineering works and mitigating the impact on travellers??
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5335


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 14, 2010, 18:44:40 »

How does the Network Rail/FGW (First Great Western) relationship work when it comes to planning engineering works and mitigating the impact on travellers??

Network Rail publish their maintenance requirements (the possessions plan) upwards of two years in advance, it appears solely up to NR» (Network Rail - home page) to try and plan the work so that all routes in a region are not closed at the same time.

The plan is available online, search for 'rules of the route' on the NR website.  AFAICT (as far as I can tell) FGW (or any TOC (Train Operating Company)) then just operate whatever the plan allows, using standard diversionary timetables that are fairly predictable, otherwise they would have to create a new timetable every time.

Paul
Logged
unfarepayingpassenger
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 19


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 12, 2010, 20:47:08 »

I'm glad that someone else recognises that their contract for travel is with the transport undertaking and not Network Rail.
And I agree with fgw starting from rock bottom. Are we supposed to be happy that they are trying to work towards a better service - a position that they should already be in.
The only thing that they have got better at is getting more money out of the passengers. My journey to work has been made worse, because of the train before mine that doesn't stop at Didcot or Reading. It forces passengers to get later trains or change at Swindon, making my train more crowded. Angry
Logged
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 12, 2010, 21:03:52 »

Well, guess what, the people on the trian before yours are fare-paying passengers too! Believe it or not, FGW (First Great Western) has not made that change with the sole intention of inconveniencing you: faced with a rail network running at full capacity during peak commuter periods, their train planners have to make decisions that will benefit as many people as possible. Sadly it's a fact of life.

And your assertion that "the only thing they have got better as is getting more money out of passengers" is clearly rubbish as well, when you look at the performance of the service provided now compared to before.

Again, I'll ask you...do you have anything constructive to say or have you just come here to vent?
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 12, 2010, 23:19:57 »

It forces passengers to get later trains or change at Swindon, making my train more crowded. Angry

Do you get a seat? There are enough people getting off the 0811 at Swindon that I would imagine most people boarding at Swindon get a seat.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page