Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 08 Jan 2025
 
- Mother 'not surprised' son killed on London bus
- Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)
Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

Train RunningCancelled
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
21:39 Paignton to Exmouth
21:53 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
22:51 London Paddington to Worcestershire Parkway
23:20 Exmouth to Exeter St Davids
09/01/25 05:57 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 06:30 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 07:20 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 07:54 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 08:30 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 09:05 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 09:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 10:08 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 10:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 11:06 Looe to Liskeard
09/01/25 11:36 Liskeard to Looe
09/01/25 12:08 Looe to Liskeard
Short Run
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
Delayed
18:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:51 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:22 Reading to Shalford
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 08, 2025, 21:32:42 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[201] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[107] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[68] Views sought : how train companies give assistance to disabled...
[53] Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
[44] senior railcard
[43] Coastal walks - station to station
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13]
  Print  
Author Topic: Pilning - the station, services, viability and closure of down platform - ongoing discussion  (Read 134207 times)
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1547



View Profile
« Reply #180 on: April 30, 2023, 13:27:21 »

Driving around the Culm valley the other day was a nightmare with the numerous potholes camouflaged as puddles in the rain. Slow progress in order to avoid them where possible!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #181 on: November 05, 2023, 06:51:17 »

Flagging up "on this day" - 7 years since the removal of the Pilning footbridge.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5452


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #182 on: July 17, 2024, 17:05:58 »

Quote
Where building happens should in part be guided by existing and proposed transport infrastructure. [...] Pilning station to the north of the city is surrounded by an area of green fields which is designated as greenbelt. It is an excellent example of where much more could be gained from existing transport infrastructure if development were allowed to happen. If 800 metres of land was released around this station, building on this land at 40 to 50 units per hectare would provide 7,500 to 9,500 new homes. Doing this around all stations within 45 minutes of central Bristol would provide an extra 55,200 homes.
Source: Ship shape? How the planning system is holding back Bristol’s economy, centreforcities
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #183 on: July 17, 2024, 17:21:45 »

Quote
Where building happens should in part be guided by existing and proposed transport infrastructure. [...] Pilning station to the north of the city is surrounded by an area of green fields which is designated as greenbelt. It is an excellent example of where much more could be gained from existing transport infrastructure if development were allowed to happen. If 800 metres of land was released around this station, building on this land at 40 to 50 units per hectare would provide 7,500 to 9,500 new homes. Doing this around all stations within 45 minutes of central Bristol would provide an extra 55,200 homes.
Source: Ship shape? How the planning system is holding back Bristol’s economy, centreforcities


So that's roughly 20,000 residents (at 2.3 to 2.4 per home).  The 800 metre radius circle looks like:



P.S. - but is there any employment or road infrastructure anywhere near?
« Last Edit: July 17, 2024, 17:34:28 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #184 on: July 17, 2024, 17:27:50 »

The 8 stations I picked out to map at http://www.passenger.chat/28888 were Narberth, Buckenham, Finstock, Pilning, Chetnole, Langwathby, Achnasellach and Swale (I think, it's a few days back and a lot has happened).
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #185 on: July 17, 2024, 21:05:41 »

P.S. - but is there any employment or road infrastructure anywhere near?

I think I can see a couple of rural lanes and the odd lock-up unit nearby. Tongue
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13028


View Profile Email
« Reply #186 on: July 17, 2024, 21:13:06 »

That'll be the problem with Finstock too.

Better those go at Worcester Parkway (even more) or say Moreton-in-Marsh.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #187 on: July 17, 2024, 21:31:24 »

P.S. - but is there any employment or road infrastructure anywhere near?

I think I can see a couple of rural lanes and the odd lock-up unit nearby. Tongue


That'll be the problem with Finstock too.

Better those go at Worcester Parkway (even more) or say Moreton-in-Marsh.

I - err - wrote with a degree of sarcasm about Pilning there, Chris - the Severnside Industrial Park would neighbour the new housing to the south east, with its own special junction off the M49.

Now Chetnole is very much lanes, and Achnashellach is too far from just about everything!

Edit to correct my spelling - five mistakes in two sentence was bad even for me!
« Last Edit: July 18, 2024, 09:33:11 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 561


View Profile
« Reply #188 on: July 22, 2024, 15:00:18 »

Quote
Where building happens should in part be guided by existing and proposed transport infrastructure. [...] Pilning station to the north of the city is surrounded by an area of green fields which is designated as greenbelt. It is an excellent example of where much more could be gained from existing transport infrastructure if development were allowed to happen. If 800 metres of land was released around this station, building on this land at 40 to 50 units per hectare would provide 7,500 to 9,500 new homes. Doing this around all stations within 45 minutes of central Bristol would provide an extra 55,200 homes.
Source: Ship shape? How the planning system is holding back Bristol’s economy, centreforcities

Perhaps I'm being a pessimist, but not sure that building 9500 new homes around 22 feet above sea level would be the smartest move in the world.

By contrast, there's plenty of land between Yate/Chipping Sodbury/Coalpit Heath/Winterbourne and the M4 which would be be ideal for housing if the railway could  have another pair of tracks to enable a 15-minute service. 
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19084


Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!


View Profile Email
« Reply #189 on: July 22, 2024, 21:19:53 »


Perhaps I'm being a pessimist, but not sure that building 9500 new homes around 22 feet above sea level would be the smartest move in the world.


Excellent point.  That's what's been pointed out to various developers who want to build more houses to the west and north of Nailsea.

It's lovely pasture in the summer, but in the winter much of it is under surface water.  Roll Eyes

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #190 on: September 08, 2024, 06:41:24 »

"On this day" flags up the opening of New Passage Pier on 8th September 1863, but the web site that hosted the original article is no more.  We do host (for members only due to copyright) a list of stations bypassed at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/mirror/bypass_stations.pdf which makes fascinating reading.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2459


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #191 on: September 08, 2024, 10:31:28 »

"On this day" flags up the opening of New Passage Pier on 8th September 1863, but the web site that hosted the original article is no more.  We do host (for members only due to copyright) a list of stations bypassed at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/mirror/bypass_stations.pdf which makes fascinating reading.

Bah, tapping the link brings up the message "file can't be downloaded securely" on my android phone.
If it's the New Passage pier at Severn Beach, as I believe it is, I'll actually be down that way later this month so might incorporate that into my stroll.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43062



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #192 on: September 08, 2024, 10:40:47 »

Bah, tapping the link brings up the message "file can't be downloaded securely" on my android phone.
If it's the New Passage pier at Severn Beach, as I believe it is, I'll actually be down that way later this month so might incorporate that into my stroll.

I am very much aware of http v https issues - what comes of being an 18 month project that's been running 18 years.  Much work underway but I beyond comments already made not saying anything more at present. The thing about R&D is that you don't know for sure if you'll succeed until you do!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2139



View Profile
« Reply #193 on: September 08, 2024, 10:46:33 »

As a matter of interest, this was Pilning yesterday (7th September 2024). Picture and comment taken from a FB post by Ashford Clark and reproduced here with permission.


Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 11 12 [13]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page