Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:35 26 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
26th Apr (2016)
DOO strikes start on Southern (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
Short Run
16:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
Delayed
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
16:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
16:02 Westbury to Gloucester
16:08 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:30 Frome to Bristol Temple Meads
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:44 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Great Malvern
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 26, 2025, 17:37:49 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[139] Standardisation of Time and the Railway Clearing House
[82] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[77] Intoxicated person plan needed on Tube - coroner, April 2025
[56] Gloucester station needs an east-facing bay platform
[53] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[49] HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general dis...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11]
  Print  
Author Topic: Tram overturns in Croydon - 7 killed, 51 injured - 9 Nov 2016  (Read 66281 times)
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8630



View Profile
« Reply #150 on: June 19, 2023, 18:39:24 »

A lot of questions still to be answered.

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) News - Croydon tram crash: Driver not guilty over fatal derailment
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-65949347
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1375



View Profile
« Reply #151 on: June 19, 2023, 21:06:28 »

Reading the reports in the press, I am glad with the verdict such as was delivered. Too many systemic problems to heap guilt on to one man. I offer this opinion as an amateur (but professionally delivering) railwayman myself. I understand the frustrations and heartache of the bereaved and injured but they should be looking higher up the management structure (and safety culture as it was then) for the underlying reasons IMHO ('in my humble opinion').
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #152 on: June 20, 2023, 18:42:42 »

Reading the reports in the press, I am glad with the verdict such as was delivered. Too many systemic problems to heap guilt on to one man. I offer this opinion as an amateur (but professionally delivering) railwayman myself. I understand the frustrations and heartache of the bereaved and injured but they should be looking higher up the management structure (and safety culture as it was then) for the underlying reasons IMHO ('in my humble opinion').

It is this part quoted on the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) link
Quote
He told them: "I'm a human being and sometimes as a human being things happen to you that you are not in control of."
so he was negligent but not grossly negligent (Gross negligence is a heightened degree of negligence representing an extreme departure from the ordinary standard of care. Falling between intent to do wrongful harm and ordinary negligence, gross negligence is defined as willful, wanton, and reckless conduct affecting the life or property or another.)

It would be interesting to see the summing up and direction of the Judge to the Jury

Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13339


View Profile Email
« Reply #153 on: June 20, 2023, 18:49:23 »

I would be interested if the bereaved sued for compensation & brought in both Driver & TfL» (Transport for London - about)/Tram company on that statement.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8630



View Profile
« Reply #154 on: June 20, 2023, 21:03:25 »

I would be interested if the bereaved sued for compensation & brought in both Driver & TfL» (Transport for London - about)/Tram company on that statement.

That's a very good point.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #155 on: June 20, 2023, 21:53:52 »

I would be interested if the bereaved sued for compensation & brought in both Driver & TfL» (Transport for London - about)/Tram company on that statement.

What's the point in suing the driver, he is unlikely to have any wealth or assets to speak of so it would be vindictive also he has been proven innocent in a Criminal Court so in a civil court the prosecution would have to show the Criminal Court was wrong.

The wealth is with TfL (aka the Tax Payer) if there is, which is likely, compensation will more than probably be settled out of Court, once the Criminal case has finished, there is nothing further to prove, the only things are the amount of money and an apology from TfL.  To take the compensation to Court will incur costs and there is no guarantee the plaintives (victims) would get all of their cost covered above the amount of compensation.

The tram driver is now by virtue of the verdict a victim and is entitled to compensation from TfL for putting his health and safety at risk whilst at work.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Phantom
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 553



View Profile
« Reply #156 on: June 21, 2023, 11:51:19 »

I would be interested if the bereaved sued for compensation & brought in both Driver & TfL» (Transport for London - about)/Tram company on that statement.

What's the point in suing the driver, he is unlikely to have any wealth or assets to speak of so it would be vindictive also he has been proven innocent in a Criminal Court so in a civil court the prosecution would have to show the Criminal Court was wrong.

The wealth is with TfL (aka the Tax Payer) if there is, which is likely, compensation will more than probably be settled out of Court, once the Criminal case has finished, there is nothing further to prove, the only things are the amount of money and an apology from TfL.  To take the compensation to Court will incur costs and there is no guarantee the plaintives (victims) would get all of their cost covered above the amount of compensation.

The tram driver is now by virtue of the verdict a victim and is entitled to compensation from TfL for putting his health and safety at risk whilst at work.

Personally speaking it may help with closure as I am sure there will be a lot of bitterness with this outcome
The driver has to be accountable
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13339


View Profile Email
« Reply #157 on: June 21, 2023, 13:20:49 »

I would be interested if the bereaved sued for compensation & brought in both Driver & TfL» (Transport for London - about)/Tram company on that statement.

What's the point in suing the driver, he is unlikely to have any wealth or assets to speak of so it would be vindictive also he has been proven innocent in a Criminal Court so in a civil court the prosecution would have to show the Criminal Court was wrong.

Is this correct? I ask because the test of culpability is less in a civil case, isn't it? And the driver was negligent, he admitted same.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1801



View Profile
« Reply #158 on: June 21, 2023, 17:44:10 »

Quote
Is this correct? I ask because the test of culpability is less in a civil case, isn't it? And the driver was negligent, he admitted same.

Yes - it's a balance of probabilities test for civil liability, beyond reasonable doubt test for criminal liability
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1375



View Profile
« Reply #159 on: June 21, 2023, 22:45:30 »

We shall see who my 'Learned Friends' advise the victims to sue, but I suspect, if they do at all, it will be higher in the food chain than the driver.
Logged
Phantom
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 553



View Profile
« Reply #160 on: June 22, 2023, 10:45:18 »

We shall see who my 'Learned Friends' advise the victims to sue, but I suspect, if they do at all, it will be higher in the food chain than the driver.

He has lots of "get outs"
- Lack of training
- over worked

etc etc
Logged
Witham Bobby
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 740



View Profile
« Reply #161 on: June 22, 2023, 12:42:30 »

The principle of vicarious liability means that employers are responsible for the negligence of their employees when the negligence occurs at work
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6643


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #162 on: June 22, 2023, 20:17:25 »

We shall see who my 'Learned Friends' advise the victims to sue, but I suspect, if they do at all, it will be higher in the food chain than the driver.

Correct - the driver may not even have a job now, and is not worth pursuing. I would imagine an offer has already been made to the parties with justifiable claims by lawyers acting for the tram company or their insurers. Some may have been settled already, or received interim payments - I would hope so after almost 7 years.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page