I find it fascinating that running a 387 on an 'Intercity' service as being a 'good to see' story!!!
If 387's had been proposed as the units to used on the GW▸ for the on set there would have been screams of 'this is degrading the service' although 387's are used on many other routes of services that could be classed 'Intercity'
The same can be said of running what is essentially a middle-distance commuter train in pairs on long distance leisure services [ (c) broadgage ]
Broadgage would suggest that use of a 387 instead of an
HST▸ would have been a considerable downgrade.
IETs▸ are however a considerable downgrade if compared to an HST, and a 387 is not much worse. Both are arguably middle distance commuter trains and not inter city.
I'm glad we got that one out of the way before breakfast.
But ... how much of the traffic had become, is now, and will be in the future "middle distance" traffic and not inter-city? I suspect that the product would benefit from change to reflect the new market as it has become and where it could be further sustainably developed.
Exactly. Passengers moving around between Reading, Swindon and Didcot, or from Bristol Parkway to Newport and Cardiff may even prefer these to an IET for ease of boarding and alighting in busy periods. Would the alternative be IET, Turbo, or no train at all?