Transport policies - who would you vote for on transport policy alone?

Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 03:15 08 Jan 2025

- Boy, 14, stabbed to death on London bus

Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]

today - Steam loco restoration - IRTE
tomorrow - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end

On this day
8th Jan (1991)

Cannon Street buffer stop collision (link)

• • • • • • Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple Meads • Bath Spa • Chippenham • Swindon • Didcot Parkway • Reading • London Paddington • Melksham
Exeter St Davids • Taunton • Westbury • Trowbridge • Bristol Parkway • Cardiff Central • Oxford • Cheltenham Spa • Birmingham New Street

January 08, 2025, 03:24:22

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Most recently liked subjects
[204] Coastal walks - station to station
[180] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[79] Fatal Oxfordshire train crash remembered 150 years on
[48] Oxford station - facilities, improvements, parking, incidents ...
[36] Senior Railcard - ongoing issues, merged posts
[14] Least important issues reported on Journey Check

News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too

Home

Help

Calendar

Great Western Coffee Shop > All across the Great Western territory > Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years > Transport policies - who would you vote for on transport policy alone?

Poll

Question:

Transport policies - who would you vote for on transport policy alone? (Voting closed: November 27, 2019, 07:38:56)

Brexit Party	0 (0%)
Conservative	3 (13.6%)
Green	3 (13.6%)
Independent Group for Change	0 (0%)
Labour	4 (18.2%)
Liberal Democrat	7 (31.8%)
Plaid Cymru	0 (0%)
UKIP	0 (0%)
(Someone else)	0 (0%)
(Not decided)	4 (18.2%)
(Won't vote)	1 (4.5%)

Total Voters: 22

Pages: 1 [2]

« previous next »

Author

Topic: Transport policies - who would you vote for on transport policy alone? (Read 6066 times)

broadgage

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 5632

Re: Transport policies - who would you vote for on transport policy alone?

« Reply #15 on: November 30, 2019, 17:06:02 »

I am not aware of electricity ever being supplied for lighting at a lower rate than for power.
This is a relatively new urban myth.
Historically, electricity for lighting and for power WERE separately metered in the UK^▸ and some other places, but the "lighting" rate was always HIGHER.

Returning to the charging of electric vehicles, I doubt that charging a different rate would be viable, people will simply slow charge from a standard 13 amp socket. Or connect a fast charger to the cooker or shower circuit.


	Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU^▸ is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.

Celestial

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 674

Re: Transport policies - who would you vote for on transport policy alone?

« Reply #16 on: November 30, 2019, 18:17:12 »

Quote from: broadgage on November 30, 2019, 17:06:02

I am not aware of electricity ever being supplied for lighting at a lower rate than for power.

Historically, electricity for lighting and for power WERE separately metered in the UK^▸ and some other places, but the "lighting" rate was always HIGHER.

Isn't electricity a form of power? So it can't be supplied for the use of power.


	Logged

broadgage

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 5632

Re: Transport policies - who would you vote for on transport policy alone?

« Reply #17 on: November 30, 2019, 18:22:26 »

Strictly speaking you are correct, however "electricity for lighting" and "electricity for power" were the generally used and generally accepted terms.
The "power" rate was invariably lower.


	Logged

Bmblbzzz

Transport Scholar
Hero Member

Posts: 4256

Re: Transport policies - who would you vote for on transport policy alone?

« Reply #18 on: November 30, 2019, 20:07:17 »

I think in Italy the lighting rate was cheaper. But it doesn't matter which way round it was.


	Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.

Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: 1 [2]

« previous next »

Jump to:

This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of page • Jump to Forum Home Page