Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 26 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
26th Apr (2016)
DOO strikes start on Southern (link)

Train RunningDelayed
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:20 Hereford to London Paddington
20:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
20:30 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 26, 2025, 23:36:30 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[121] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[109] Standardisation of Time and the Railway Clearing House
[60] Intoxicated person plan needed on Tube - coroner, April 2025
[49] Grand Central applies for Newcastle–Brighton via North Downs
[44] Gloucester station needs an east-facing bay platform
[41] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: March 2016 Budget  (Read 8962 times)
Oberon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 186


View Profile
« on: March 16, 2016, 20:44:06 »

George Osboren's budget today provides an additional ^5m to support the Peninsula Rail Task Force in developing options to improve the resilience of the rail line between Newton Abbot, Dawlish and Exeter, and the government ^will fully consider the recommendations in the Peninsula Rail Task Force's final report when it is published in June.^

A further ^3m will improve stations across the southwest, and ^7m to improve rail stations in the southeast.

So we've not been completely forgotten.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 13339


View Profile Email
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2016, 21:03:50 »

Redhill, Newbury & High Wycombe in the SE. Doesn't say which SW stations
Logged
Oberon
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 186


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2016, 07:25:03 »

"There is ^16m to improve station facilities at Market Harborough, St Albans, Redhill, Newbury, High Wycombe, Exeter St David^s, Weston-Super-Mare, and Cheltenham Spa; the redevelopment of St Albans City station is allocated ^5m. The full business case for a new Thameslink station at Brent Cross has also been approved."
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2016, 08:33:19 »

I wonder what they'll do at Newbury? The footbridge looks very tatty to me, for a start.

A lot of work to do anyway I guess in connection with getting the wires up. The Station area at Newbury is one of the few (along the to be electrified section of the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury)) where there seems to be no outward sign of any work related to this having started at all?
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 583


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2016, 13:56:09 »

I wonder what they'll do at Newbury? The footbridge looks very tatty to me, for a start.

A lot of work to do anyway I guess in connection with getting the wires up. The Station area at Newbury is one of the few (along the to be electrified section of the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury)) where there seems to be no outward sign of any work related to this having started at all?

Isn't there a road bridge to rebuild before much can be done? Can't remember the timelines but it's basically all hands on deck to get Tilehurst to Didcot electrified for IEP (Intercity Express Program / Project. This will offer more capacity on routes, save money, give a consistent and safe service and meet customer requirements. Intended to replace HSTs.) testing, with Newbury only getting a look in when the mainline is pretty much complete.
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2016, 19:35:47 »

Yes, there's the Boundary Lane bridge between Newbury and Newbury Racecourse that is closed for most of this year (I think) for rebuild.

To me that doesn't mean that work around Newbury Station itself couldn't start, but take your point that all the focus at the moment is on getting Tilehurst to Didcot (and Airport Junction to Tilehurst) done.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43911



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2016, 19:52:09 »

To me that doesn't mean that work around Newbury Station itself couldn't start ...

agreed, but if they did a lot f work a year or two early then left it unused, they would open themselves to criticism!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2165



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2016, 20:20:23 »

To me that doesn't mean that work around Newbury Station itself couldn't start ...

agreed, but if they did a lot f work a year or two early then left it unused, they would open themselves to criticism!

Damned if you do, damned if you don't!
Logged
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 583


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2016, 22:42:59 »

Yes, there's the Boundary Lane bridge between Newbury and Newbury Racecourse that is closed for most of this year (I think) for rebuild.

To me that doesn't mean that work around Newbury Station itself couldn't start, but take your point that all the focus at the moment is on getting Tilehurst to Didcot (and Airport Junction to Tilehurst) done.

Someone answered my question on another forum, Airport Jcn to Maidenhead (which is being done under a separate contract as part of Crossrail) was supposed to have OHLE (Over-Head Line Equipment (electrification via catenary)) in revenue earning service from December 2016 but looks set to be June 2017. So basically even if you could wave a magic wand on Newbury, you'd still be stuck waiting for Crossrail, and no-one in their right mind is going to risk rushing that
Logged
Thatcham Crossing
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 793


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2016, 08:12:20 »

Don't disagree with what anyone is saying, it just seems a bit odd that a lot of the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury) section that is to be electrified (between Southcote Junction and Newbury) has the trackside piles in - I'd say 70-80% from my recent observations - but nothing (that I can see) around the station area itself in Newbury.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7426


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2016, 09:01:19 »

Don't disagree with what anyone is saying, it just seems a bit odd that a lot of the B&H (Berks and Hants - railway line from Reading to Taunton via Westbury) section that is to be electrified (between Southcote Junction and Newbury) has the trackside piles in - I'd say 70-80% from my recent observations - but nothing (that I can see) around the station area itself in Newbury.

It may look a bit more logical if viewed in terms of work scheduling and resources.

For some of the time, at least, the "HOPS" piling train (doesn't that name now seem rather quaint and out of date?) was being used wherever possible, but couldn't do every pile. That's one of the reasons it's not been very productive. The remaining piles are done "by hand", but they too can be done with little by way of forward planning, by crews who just keep working through a list of "things to do".

The station, however, is likely to involve more complicated work (more stuff in the way), more machinery, and so would probably be planned as a single mini-project with a work compound on site, public notification of start and end dates, etc. And it could require more planning and detail design work, in which case it may be held up by resource limits in that area. And as it didn't get a fixed date before Chairman Hendy's "great leap to the right", it may now happen later as a result.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2016, 09:39:50 »

It's also been fairly obvious on the Reading - Didcot section that all the station areas were also left untouched while piles went in either side, - and this makes sense particularly if the work can ultimately be done working from the platforms outside of track possessions.

I don't go on the Reading to London stretch that often, but that also seems to show 'mass production' only between stations.  The conclusion must be that having a gap in the piling through Newbury station is intentional.

Paul
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10453


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2016, 09:49:12 »

That's right.  The station areas are now starting to get some attention, gantries installed within the platform areas at places such as Cholsey, Taplow and several of the other smaller stations.  Larger stations such as Maidenhead and Slough are still largely untouched.  Perhaps the Easter blockade will see some movement in those areas?  I expect electrification progress to be quite intense during the blockade.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page