Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:15 22 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 22nd Apr

Train RunningCancelled
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
07:38 Exeter St Davids to Okehampton
07:40 Reading to London Paddington
07:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:15 Basingstoke to Reading
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:25 Okehampton to Exeter Central
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:35 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Short Run
05:29 Swansea to London Paddington
06:43 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington
07:17 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
07:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
07:44 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
07:57 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
08:04 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
08:07 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
08:16 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
08:34 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
08:38 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
08:48 Newbury to London Paddington
09:08 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
09:49 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:12 London Paddington to Newbury
Delayed
05:51 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
07:03 London Paddington to Newbury
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 22, 2025, 08:20:58 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[79] Fortuitous connections ... and an App which fails to offer the...
[68] Firstgroup's rail division trading 'ahead of expectations'
[57] Eyesight rules for motorists unsafe, says coroner
[47] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[46] West Somerset Railway - Bishops Lydeard to Minehead (merged po...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Second Corby to Kettering railway track to be restored  (Read 4892 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10236



View Profile
« on: February 06, 2014, 19:36:34 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page)

Quote
Second Corby to Kettering railway track to be restored

Network Rail hopes restoring a second track on a line in Northamptonshire will lead to a boost in train services.

The second track on the line between Corby and Kettering was removed in 1986 when traffic decreased with the closure of steelmaking in the town.

Five years ago, Corby rail station was reopened and passenger services grew.

Network Rail has confirmed plans are under development to reinstate the second track. A consultation with local residents will take place this year.

The scheme is designed to increase capacity in response to growing demand for rail travel and rail freight.

A Network Rail spokesman said: "These plans are still under development. Once we have suitable detail we will carry out a programme of engagement with local residents and stakeholders to inform them of our plans."
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2014, 23:58:17 »

Interesting - Who knows what precedents that might set...
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
wabbit
Full Member
***
Posts: 30


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 07, 2014, 07:45:25 »

Good news, another step in the right direction (hopefully)!
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 07, 2014, 15:16:18 »

This is an already known about part of the CP5 (Control Period 5 - the five year period between 2014 and 2019) HLOS (High Level Output Specification - the DfT's High Level Output Specification, which has specified to Network Rail the outputs that need to be delivered within a Control Period (CP)) though.  DfT» (Department for Transport - about) included it in their 2012 list of requirements, and it was in the Dec 2012 draft of NR» (Network Rail - home page)'s P5 projects.

Paul
Logged
Worcester_Passenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2116


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 07, 2014, 17:02:13 »

Is it the intention to double the service frequency so that Corby gets a half-hourly service? If so, how does this affect the stopping services on the Midland Main Line?
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 07, 2014, 17:24:21 »

The description in the draft enhancements plan now has the re-doubling embedded in the overall 'electric spine' project.  All I can glean is that it is more to do with overall line capacity than any explicit increase in Corby's passenger service:

Quote
Midland Main Line capacity (Bedford ^ Sharnbrook - Kettering ^ Corby)
This project seeks to deliver enhanced track capacity for additional services on the Midland
Main Line in the future
. The scope of works for this scheme may include; doubling the track
from Kettering to Corby, new track and linespeed increases between Bedford and Kettering
and improvements in the Bedford area. The delivery timescale of these schemes will be
determined by the Midland Main Line electrification programme and the East Midlands
resignalling works.

Is one of the problems with the current setup that they have to leave some gaps in the otherwise regular service to allow for existing freight to run?

Paul
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 07, 2014, 19:55:44 »

Is the idea to send more freight via Melton instead of Leicester?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page