Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 09 Jan 2025
 
- Fresh weather warnings for ice across UK
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Bath Railway Society
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
9th Jan (2004)
Incorporation of Railway Development Society Ltd (now Railfuture) (link)

Train RunningShort Run
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:56 Exmouth to Paignton
19:15 Paignton to Exmouth
19:17 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
19:25 Exmouth to Paignton
19:31 Okehampton to Exeter Central
19:56 Exmouth to Paignton
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
Delayed
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
17:52 Trowbridge to Great Malvern
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
18:34 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 09, 2025, 20:21:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Railcard Prices going up
[126] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[97] Thumpers for Dummies
[53] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[36] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[34] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Flooding Train Plan Friday 10th January 2014  (Read 12407 times)
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10363


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: January 10, 2014, 13:01:54 »

If the flooding south of Oxford is going to be a regular event then FGW (First Great Western) should draw up a contingency plan involving the evacuation of Turbos from Oxford sidings to other locations - but didn't that happen once with Turbos moved out via Banbury, High Wycombe and Greenford? Why not this time?

EDIT - just seen II's posting about Oxford drivers, but again surely a proper contingency plan for a regular flooding occurrence could include transferring drivers by road.

Just a couple of points to raise, whilst wishing to reiterate that many areas of service provision this week could have been improved!

1)  There are hardly any units in the Oxford area (at least there weren't on Wed/Thu).  There are a couple that are specifically being used to run through the flood water and the others (five or so) are required to work the Banbury and Worcester service.  The line has stayed open, so at least fuelling issues are not so much of a problem as units can be swapped overnight if necessary.

2)  Transferring drivers (and indeed passengers) by road is very difficult when both of the routes out of the city for the south (Abingdon Road/Botley Road) are both shut due to flooding (they still are).  So going up the Woodstock/Banbury Road is the only option and those are heavily congested and take much longer at the best of times.  I think I remember seeing a tweet from the Oxford Bus Company saying that one of their buses took 1h 20m to get down the length of the Woodstock Road in rush hour on Wednesday evening - that's 80 minutes to cover 2 miles!
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4496


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: January 10, 2014, 19:44:43 »

Can't feel much for Maidenhead - Oxford have it *far* worse.

Whilst have a lot of empathy for Oxford passengers, but what FGW (First Great Western) have successfully expanded the misery when there is no need too; yesterday and this morning the 07:02 (6 car turbo) which is a Didcot start was cancelled it was shown as right time but was capped at Reading why?  The 07:08 (8 car HST (High Speed Train)) was also cancelled this is understandable as it has to travel over the flooded route then the 07:16 (a 5 car turbo) cancelled which left the 07:13 (a 5 car turbo) which also calls at Slough to pick up several hundred passengers.

FGW must have planned to fail because the usual number of platform staff to see off the departure the HSS (High Speed Services) from Maidenhead have been absent just leaving the poor old station manager to deal with a lot of irate people.

There has been a total lack of communication or apology to the Maidenhead passengers from FGW most of the accept the fact there may be some disruption but as far a Maidenhead early morning peak fast services abandonment is the word I would use. 
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: January 10, 2014, 21:05:20 »

Can't feel much for Maidenhead - Oxford have it *far* worse.

Whilst have a lot of empathy for Oxford passengers, but what FGW (First Great Western) have successfully expanded the misery when there is no need too; yesterday and this morning the 07:02 (6 car turbo) which is a Didcot start was cancelled it was shown as right time but was capped at Reading why?  The 07:08 (8 car HST (High Speed Train)) was also cancelled this is understandable as it has to travel over the flooded route then the 07:16 (a 5 car turbo) cancelled which left the 07:13 (a 5 car turbo) which also calls at Slough to pick up several hundred passengers.

FGW must have planned to fail because the usual number of platform staff to see off the departure the HSS (High Speed Services) from Maidenhead have been absent just leaving the poor old station manager to deal with a lot of irate people.

There has been a total lack of communication or apology to the Maidenhead passengers from FGW most of the accept the fact there may be some disruption but as far a Maidenhead early morning peak fast services abandonment is the word I would use. 

Exactly.. Issues created where they weren't necessarily needed.. no info as usual  Roll Eyes Grin
Logged
johoare
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2818


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: January 10, 2014, 21:22:58 »

Also this morning..  The info boards at Maidenhead showed 7.45, 7.46, 7.48 and 7.49 stopping trains to London.. Quite impressive and also impossible.. On NR» (Network Rail - home page) departures board the 7.45 showed as cancelled.. It ran.. 7.46 and 7.48 were fictitious it seems.. Meanwhile the 7.59 and 8.02 passengers got the chance to play musical platforms.. All good fun  Roll Eyes
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page