Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 17:15 26 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
26th Apr (2016)
DOO strikes start on Southern (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
Short Run
16:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
Delayed
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
16:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
16:02 Westbury to Gloucester
16:08 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:30 Frome to Bristol Temple Meads
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:44 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
18:02 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Great Malvern
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 26, 2025, 17:33:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[139] Standardisation of Time and the Railway Clearing House
[82] Penryn to Melksham - summary and some pictures from 25.4.2025
[77] Intoxicated person plan needed on Tube - coroner, April 2025
[56] Gloucester station needs an east-facing bay platform
[53] BBC TV Licensing - ongoing discussion
[49] HS2 - Government proposals, alternative routes and general dis...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Quite literally "Not In My Back Yard."  (Read 1833 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19307



View Profile
« on: May 18, 2012, 20:56:42 »

From the Islington Tribune:

Quote
Back gardens could be ripped up in 'green corridor' as Network Rail plans to strengthen embankment near track

NETWORK Rail is accused this week of threatening to rip up entire swathes of back gardens at up to 25 homes in Canonbury as part of a plan to strengthen an embankment.

Residents in St Paul^s Road will lose trees, vegetation and rare bird habitats, and in many cases wide stretches of their gardens, for the development, which is in a ^green corridor^, an area designated a site of nature conservation importance.

Network Rail plans to shore up the embankment and build a security fence along a stretch of track between Highbury Grove Bridge and Canonbury station, on the Richmond to Stratford Overground line.

The company is to ^re-profile^ the embankment, which will mean taking away land from at least 20 to 25 gardens.

Many of the gardens are owned by Network Rail and residents pay rent for the space.

A public meeting organised by Network Rail is being held at Highbury Grove School at 6pm on Thursday.

Islington Council is expected to formally object to the scheme on the grounds that the loss of gardens will have a detrimental effect on residents.

Islington North Labour MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) Jeremy Corbyn is asking the rail company to investigate less invasive ways of strengthening the em^bankment.

Michael Graham, who drives tour buses for groups such as the Rolling Stones and Status Quo, has lived in the road for almost 30 years.

He pays ^60 a year rent to Network Rail for his garden, but stands to lose a large area which has been carefully nurtured.

^We^ve spent a great deal of time and effort cultivating our garden,^ he said. ^We face heavy traffic at the front of our house and, of course, there is the noise of the trains. The garden, which looks onto the line, is our bit of serenity.^

Residents maintain the embankment could have been strengthened without disruption to residents two years ago when work began on the new Highbury and Islington to Crystal Palace line.

Mr Graham^s wife, Amina Patel, a teacher at Kingsway College, said: ^It^s not just the loss of our garden, it^s an entire green corridor under threat.^

Professional artist Jill Bryson fears she could lose a wide stretch of her garden.

^We^ve spent years caring for it,^ she said. ^But all we^ll be left with is a path if we are lucky.^

Labour councillor  Kate Groucutt said: ^I understand that private owners have individual garden leases with Network Rail and that these were changed last year. Unfortunately, if Network Rail is the owner of the land and has gone through the correct process to reclaim possession then there may be little we can do to stop it. But we can certainly try to reduce the amount of garden lost.^

Nick Gray, community relations manager with the rail company, said the problem was caused by the build-up of fly-tipping.

^This has created a high risk for potential bank slippage, which threatens the operation of the railway,^ he added.

The work could begin as soon as next month and could take about four weeks.

Workmen will use an access point at Harecourt Road.
Logged

"Good news for regular users of Euston Station in London! One day they will die. Then they won't have to go to Euston Station ever again." - David Mitchell
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4524


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 18, 2012, 21:22:22 »

'Shore up the embankment' may be the word.  Perhaps they want the emankment to collapse on their garden. 
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5346


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 19, 2012, 09:31:31 »

'Shore up the embankment' may be the word.  Perhaps they want the emankment to collapse on their garden. 

The railway is in a cutting along that stretch though, and what NR» (Network Rail - home page) are probably proposing to do is to reduce the slope, so they'll cut away the bottom of the gardens, rather than cover them with a wider embankment. 

It's a poor explanation in the report, by the simple expedient of using the word embankment when in normal (and railway) usage it is a cutting...

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page