Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 05:15 22 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

No 'On This Day' events reported for 22nd Apr

Train RunningCancelled
04:53 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
04:59 Swansea to London Paddington
05:44 London Paddington to Greenford
06:14 Greenford to West Ealing
06:28 West Ealing to Greenford
06:43 Greenford to West Ealing
Short Run
05:29 Swansea to London Paddington
06:23 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
06:38 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
06:43 Worcester Shrub Hill to London Paddington
07:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:49 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 22, 2025, 05:16:53 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[96] Fortuitous connections ... and an App which fails to offer the...
[82] Firstgroup's rail division trading 'ahead of expectations'
[68] Eyesight rules for motorists unsafe, says coroner
[56] RNLI station celebrates 10 years of saving lives - Portishead,...
[56] West Somerset Railway - Bishops Lydeard to Minehead (merged po...
[53] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: CAA calls for increased airport capacity  (Read 1261 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19560



View Profile Email
« on: January 10, 2012, 23:09:26 »

From the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page):

Quote
The UK (United Kingdom) economy will suffer if airport capacity in the south-east of England is not increased, according to the Civil Aviation Authority.

Without extra runway capacity, customers will face higher fares and reduced choice, said a CAA» (Civil Aviation Authority - about) report.

The government said it was committed to developing "a sustainable policy framework for aviation".

But John Stewart of Hacan ClearSkies said capacity did not need to be increased but used differently.

The CAA report argues without expansion, UK airports may struggle to handle the growth in aviation demand boosted by emerging markets such as China, India and South America as well as recovery in the UK economy. It said this was a strategic issue of national importance.

"Aviation should be able to grow, but to do so, it must be able to play its part in delivering our environmental goals and protecting quality of life of local communities," the report said.

CAA chief executive Andrew Haines said consumers and the UK economy would benefit from extra capacity "so long as it is delivered in an environmentally sustainable way".

"However, as we haven't built a single runway in the south east of England capable of handling Boeing 747s and Airbus A380s for over 70 years, the difficulty of increasing capacity is obvious," he added. "The challenge facing the Government is to create an aviation policy that stands the test of time - not a policy for five years, but one for thirty years."

The report warned fares would increase because of lack of capacity, with consumers estimated to pay ^1.7bn in fare premiums in 2030 or an extra ^10 per passenger on a return flight.

The CAA also said the focus would be on the most profitable routes.

The CAA's report comes on the same day the government gave the go-ahead to a high-speed rail line between London and Birmingham. And it comes almost two years after the government scrapped plans to build a third runway at Heathrow airport.

In response to the CAA report, Aviation Minister Theresa Villiers said: "Our Draft Civil Aviation Bill published last year will reform the way our major airports are regulated by putting the passenger first and supporting investment in the improvements that matter most to passengers."

"The government has committed to develop a sustainable policy framework for aviation."

She said a public consultation on a draft policy framework would be issued in the spring.

But British Air Transport Association chief executive Simon Buck criticised the government for agreeing to the high-speed rail line when there are no airport expansion plans. "The government appears eager to invest over ^30bn in building new railway lines in grandiose showcase schemes, cutting huge swathes through the English countryside, but at the same time has vetoed airport expansion where it is desperately needed because they say the environmental cost is too high."

However, Mr Stewart said affordable high-speed rail could be a solution to the problem. "There will be a need for more planes to come from the developing economies but the government should be looking at the number of short-haul flights in the south east, particularly Heathrow," he said.

"If passengers could be persuaded to use high-speed rail there would not be so many of those short-haul flights and those slots could be made available. If a rail journey is three-and-a-half hours or less, then people will switch to rail in fairly significant numbers, as long as it is affordable."
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post - a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London, depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page