I'm not one for 'rose-tinted spectacles' when it comes to the past being better. The rail network we have today is, in many ways far superior to the days of British Rail. Yes, there have been some dark days. Post Hatfield comes to mind. We have far more trains running today on many routes (deepest dark Wiltshire excluded
). The stopping patterns and journey times may be different, but this is, I think, a reflection of the expectations of today's travelling public.
The amount of passengers using the network today is surely a reflection that things have improved. Yes, there are still more improvements that can be made; that's the way society progresses. But I think that headline grabbing express timings are anathema to the needs of the majority of the travelling public. On the network we have at present what most passengers want is a train that gets them to their destination in a reasonable time frame compared to alternative modes. A frequent service that gives them flexibility and a service that is inclusive for all stratas of society. So shaving 10-15 minutes off the timing for a
BRI» -
PAD» HST▸ may benefit a few, but the losers at Bath, Chippenham etc will outhweigh the benefit felt by Bristolians.
I concede that as individuals we all want a service that benefits our particular needs and desires, but we have to make concessions to society as a whole. We could of course convert all railways to roads and subsidise car purchases instead.
Speed isn't everything. Slow down folks and enjoy the view