Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:15 30 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 05/05/25 - Walk to Pilning
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railway Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM

On this day
30th Apr (1972)
Brighton Belle withdrawn (link)

Train RunningCancelled
07:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
07:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
Short Run
06:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:40 Penzance to Cardiff Central
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:18 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
20:20 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 30, 2025, 08:30:19 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[231] What and why - on the platform
[212] Longer distance canal walks - public transport for one way sec...
[120] Doublebagging, Rawdoggers, Barebackers
[53] Chiltern Railways: an update on rolling stock / services
[52] Driving licences and tests - ongoing discussion, merged topics
[49] Shipping services across the Severn
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Anger over barbed wire fence to replace railings at Teddington Station  (Read 2471 times)
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 19584



View Profile Email
« on: April 10, 2010, 22:14:31 »

From ThisIsLocalLondon:

Quote
Network Rail's behaviour branded 'arrogant' after installing barbed wire fence at Teddington station without warning

A new barbed wire fence at a railway station has failed to impress residents and commuters.
Iron railings at Teddington station were removed and replaced with wire fencing but neither nearby residents or Richmond Council were informed and planning permission was not sought.
The move has angered residents, members of the Teddington Society, councillors and Twickenham MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) Vince Cable, who branded Network Rail^s behaviour ^arrogant^.
Dr Cable wrote to Network Rail^s chief executive, but was told, in this instance, it was exempt from planning orders despite the fence being in a conservation area.
The MP said: ^Residents are angry that, having neglected for years to deal with disrepair on the pedestrian bridge at Teddington station, Network Rail has now rushed through an ugly and insensitive fence. It justifies barbed wire on the basis there has been a history of vandalism, but there are other options and they should be properly discussed before rushing ahead in this arrogant manner.^
Teddington ward councillor Stephen Knight, the deputy leader of the council, said: ^Residents are rightly angry the attractive iron railings around Teddington station, which were only recently repainted, have been replaced. Network Rail has done this with no consultation or notification and has failed to apply for planning permission.^
A Network Rail spokesman said: ^The fence running along the railway around Teddington station needed replacing. As the old blue railing-style fencing no longer complies with modern standards, we replaced it with one of our standard, medium-security chainlink fences which include barbed wire at the top to act as a deterrent to people attempting to climb over it. Following concerns raised by some local people, we have offered to meet Richmond Council to discuss options for replacing the barbed wire element of the fence. It is important we maintain a secure boundary along the railway to deter trespass on the railway and vandalism.^
He revealed no planning permission was needed because the fencing was on land owned by the train company.
More details on railway fencing can be found at networkrail.co.uk/aspx/1019.aspx.
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament, or Mile Post (a method of measuring the railway in miles and chains from a starting point - usually London), depending on context) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: Stop, Look, Listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2010, 23:37:26 »

Oh dear. Bit of a Catch 22 for poor old NR» (Network Rail - home page) here! I have a great deal of time for Vince Cable but let's just say this episode doesn't enhance my opinion of him!

No doubt had there been an accident due to schoolkids or anyone else climbing over the fence in question the local rags (and perhaps parents) would have been shrieking about how it was an "accident waiting to happen".
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page