As I said, FGW▸ were getting to grips with the Class 180 fleet's peccadillos just as they went hither and thither. Splitting the small fleet to the four winds no doubt compounded the remaining problems.
No, what you said was
FGW got rid of them just as they started working properly
- not that they were getting to grips with them. Bit of a difference. And even if they were "getting to grips" with them, I would hardly regard that as a triumph after
eight years of working with 180s. And the evidence of Hull Trains' experiences suggests that FGW were not getting to grips with them, just glad to be shot of them.
HT▸ should have reaped the benefit of trains that were "working properly".
ATW▸ 's experience with the 175s is hardly any more encouraging. Compare the 175/180s with any Turbostar, or the 220/221 fleet, in terms of mechanical reliability and it's clear that the Alstom products left a lot to be desired.
And when they broke down, it wasn't even always clear what was wrong with them. My breakdown experience came one evening just after leaving Charlbury, when we came to a halt with the fire alarm going. There was much stuff drifting up from underneath coach B which could have been smoke, so we were all moved to the rear of the train while firefighters were called. Eventually they and the driver decided it was steam from a broken hose, due to a cooling system fault, and we scuttled off to Moreton on the remaining engines, then the train was terminated.
I suspect that a large part of the inflated operating costs was down to the sheer amount of time being spent trying to keep them working. At least the 180s did deliver on the words of an FGW press release in December 2004 "delivering InterCity quality and comfort to the route throughout the day".
No danger of anyone accusing FGW of doing that now, with the steady march back to the pre-December 2004 situation, with the 166s back in force, also to the detriment of the Reading-Gatwick service, where the extra luggage space meant they were far more suitable than 165s. Quite how FGW has run short of
HSTs▸ at times recently when several sets presumably acquired to cover Cotswold workings in place of 180s are no longer being used baffles me.