Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 07:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025
28/01/25 - Coffee Shop 18th Birthday

On this day
10th Jan (1863)
Metropolitain line opened from Paddington (link)

Train RunningCancelled
05:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
06:19 Par to Plymouth
06:51 Reading to Redhill
07:20 London Paddington to Oxford
08:36 Redhill to Reading
09:00 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
06:31 Severn Beach to Weston-Super-Mare
06:52 Newbury to London Paddington
06:57 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
07:17 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
08:05 London Paddington to Newbury
08:34 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
Delayed
06:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 07:34:54 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[94] Thumpers for Dummies
[71] Railcard Prices going up
[58] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[50] Outstanding server / web site issues
[49] 'Railway 200' events and commemorations 2025
[46] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Poll
Question: Which Route Should be upgraded to  allow 140 mp.ph trains.  (Voting closed: January 12, 2010, 18:20:51)
Upgrade the track from Bristol to Taunton 140 m.p.h then on to Exeter - 2 (14.3%)
Upgrade the track from Reading to Taunton 140 m.p.h then on to Exeter - 12 (85.7%)
Total Voters: 14

Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: GWML Route to Exeter  (Read 17876 times)
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 13, 2010, 09:28:07 »





As reflex109 says it beyond Exeter that needs linespeed improvements.
140mph! Great for some but you said it,sustained line speeds on a so called main of 55/65mph in the 21st west of Exeter to Plymouth are now little more than a joke.The problem is if you only speed up rail services from Exeter to Padddington as has historically happened places like Plymouth and Cornwall increasingly suffer from the perception of being remote by rail and you will simply encourage the development of domestic air links to the far south west which is not really desirable when a properly funded rail alternative is within reach.
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 13, 2010, 12:39:27 »

But 155 mph-ing the route east of Exeter is (a) easier (b) will benefit more people than upping Exeter to Penzance by 10 - 20 mph here and there (c) could get London to Plymouth down to less than 2 hours 30 minutes - hardly remote (about the same as London to Worcester but about twice the distance).
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 13, 2010, 13:27:31 »

I disagree, raising (on average) the linespeed of the berks & hants by 55% is not an easy task. I certainly wouldn't fancy doing 155mph on any of it!

Improvements in Devon & Cornwall would be far easier to achieve, shaving off some of the curvature in corners for example.
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: January 13, 2010, 16:46:52 »

But 155 mph-ing the route east of Exeter is (a) easier (b) will benefit more people than upping Exeter to Penzance by 10 - 20 mph here and there (c) could get London to Plymouth down to less than 2 hours 30 minutes - hardly remote (about the same as London to Worcester but about twice the distance).
Yes but you dont have competition from Air links to Gatwick and London city airports from Worcester which could well intensify as the 21st century unfolds.Certainly I have seen the Plymouth to Exeter rail route refered to in the local press as "Plymouths victorian rail link to Exeter and the rest of Endland".You can also drive up the A38 dual carraigeway from Plymouth to Exeter(M5) in not much over half the rail journey time.It really is a matter of perception and something needs to be done about it if rail is to be taken seriously west of Exeter in the 21st century.
Logged
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 13, 2010, 17:37:02 »

But 155 mph-ing the route east of Exeter is (a) easier (b) will benefit more people than upping Exeter to Penzance by 10 - 20 mph here and there (c) could get London to Plymouth down to less than 2 hours 30 minutes - hardly remote (about the same as London to Worcester but about twice the distance).
Yes but you dont have competition from Air links to Gatwick and London city airports from Worcester which could well intensify as the 21st century unfolds.Certainly I have seen the Plymouth to Exeter rail route refered to in the local press as "Plymouths victorian rail link to Exeter and the rest of Endland".You can also drive up the A38 dual carraigeway from Plymouth to Exeter(M5) in not much over half the rail journey time.It really is a matter of perception and something needs to be done about it if rail is to be taken seriously west of Exeter in the 21st century.

And you believe what the local rag spouts!!!

The one benefit of rail, as soon as it snows, the airports are instantly shut or you don't run the risk of sitting on Halden/Telegraph hill till the early hours Wink

Whenever I travel on trains heading to Cornwall i'm always impressed at the patronage, far from being devastated by the inconvenient air flights taking you a place 30 mins by train from London.
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 13, 2010, 18:08:19 »

If the Government want to upgrade the line they could.

Just think what the Victorian did as far as the railways
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 13, 2010, 21:18:01 »

You dont have to go back to the victorians.For those interested the 1935/36 Great Western Railway plans for a new route from Exminster to Newton Abbot bypassing Teignmouth and Dawlish are held at the Devon Record Office Archives at Sowton in Exeter under the following references.
Unfortunately the 2nd World War stopped these schemes progressing.
 
                     

                         Great Western Railway (Additional Powers)  QS/DP/860  1935
Contents:
1) Railway No 1 (Newton Abbot and Dawlish): via parishes of Kingsteignton, Bishopsteignton, Urban Districts of Teignmouth and Dawlish; length 8 ^ miles; commencing and terminating at junctions with South Devon Railway.
2)Bridge, River Diversions and Lands at Exeter: parish of Upton Pyne and Borough of Exeter.

Included are sections of intended works and published map showing 1).
Scale: 25" to the mile
Surveyor: R. Carpmael (Engineer)
Plans (pen, ink) and book of reference
 
                                         Great Western Railway.  QS/DP/868 1936                                     
Contents:
1) Railway No 2. (Dawlish and Exminster): via Urban District of Dawlish, parishes of Mamhead, Kenton, Powderham, Exminster; length 7^ miles; commencing at junction with railway No 1 (see QS/DP/860), terminating at junction with South Devon Railway; includes sections of railway and road diversions en route.
2) Lands at Totnes (and at Denham in County of Buckingham).
Scale: 25" to the mile
Surveyor: R. Carpmael (Engineer)
Plan (pen, ink) and book of reference
These documents are held at Devon Record Office


   The Great Western Railway had also at that time surveyed a new route onward from Newton Abbot bypassing Totnes as well as Dainton and Rattery Banks and re-joining the existing railway near Marley Tunnel to be engineered to a minimum 1 mile radius curvature for high speed.
  How times have changed.
Logged
FlyingDutchman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 137


View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 17, 2010, 12:55:42 »

Shame this did not get off the grounds

http://web.archive.org/web/20041026081304/www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/news/release.php?item=29
Logged
Btline
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4782



View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 17, 2010, 14:43:23 »


Brings back memories of the old FGW (First Great Western)/FGWL website!
Logged
woody
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 525


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: January 17, 2010, 18:26:35 »

With reference to the 1935/36 Great Western Railway plans for a new route from Exminster to Newton Abbot, things had progressed to the point of actually buying and fencing off the necessary land but the land was eventually sold off post war in 1949 as by then the country was virtually bankrupt.Should imagine that such investment today would be prohibitively expensive as well,certainly in current economic circunstances anyway.By contrast the trunk road network in Devon and Cornwall has more or less been rebuilt to the detriment of the main line railway west of Exeter.To be honest I dont see nothing significantly changing this far south west railwaywise which is all very worrying as anything that stands still in the modern world is effectively going backwards.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page