New fare structure

amiddl

Sr. Member

Posts: 199

New fare structure - confused

« on: September 11, 2009, 23:19:02 »

I will be driving someone from Southampton to Exeter in their car on Sunday so am faced with unusually for me buying a single Exeter St Davids to Newbury. If I have read the options right traveling back on the 16.45 or 18.47 both direct to Newbury I have the choice of:-

Super Off Peak Single - ^24.50 walk up fare so doesn't matter which train I catch (which might be difficult to predict with traffic). This seems to fit my needs with no advance booking and no limitation on which train I get.

Advance Single - ^27.00 book one day in advance, must travel on booked train (tricky as could get caught in traffic and miss it or be waiting around because I arrive early).

Off Peak single - ^29.50 walk up fare any train (provided as with other fares not via Reading) - the safe bet

I am confused as I would expect the cheapest fare to have the most restrictions so can't understand why the cheapest doesn't. Please could someone enlighten me - have I missed something. I wasn't worried about the extra ^5 so as not to be caught up with to many restrictions but it seems I can walk up and buy a ticket at the cheapest price and catch either train.


	Logged

JayMac

Data Manager
Hero Member

Posts: 19245

Re: New fare structure - confused

« Reply #1 on: September 11, 2009, 23:25:55 »

If it's Sunday then there are no restrictions, (except route). Get the Super Off Peak single. You have highlighted the one advantage of the new off peak fares structure. Singles are now half the price of returns instead of just ^1 less. Seems a bit silly that your enquiry gave the option of a more expensive Advance single though.


	Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."

Chris from Nailsea

Administrator
Hero Member

Posts: 19094

Justice for Cerys Piper and Theo Griffiths please!

Re: New fare structure - confused

« Reply #2 on: September 11, 2009, 23:33:05 »

However, in view of engineering works taking place, I'd be inclined to check (and then check again!) that the trains will actually be running.

Just as an aside, there were interminable pre-recorded announcements at Bristol Temple Meads this morning about engineering works happening this weekend, all over the place (I lost the will to live, after listening to the first few of them!) but it is worth checking, if you are planning a specific journey!

C. Shocked


	Logged

William Huskisson MP^▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.

Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]

« previous next »