Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:15 19 Apr 2025
 
- Race Across the World winner on 'authentic travel' and how to do it
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury
10/05/25 - Model Railsay Show, Calne
13/05/25 - Melksham TUG / AGM
14/05/25 - West Wiltshire RUG

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:50 Liskeard to Looe
Additional 13:59 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
14:22 Looe to Liskeard
16:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
18:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
21:32 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:39 Swindon to Gloucester
Short Run
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:18 Paignton to Exmouth
13:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:12 Salisbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
21:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Westbury
Delayed
13:30 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
14:52 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2025, 14:16:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[138] FOSS and FOSW validity - some quirks
[104] Fifteen years of the Transwilts CRP
[91] Wiltshire Day Rover - new multi-operator bus ticket
[76] St Erth station - facilities, footbridge, improvements, incide...
[56] Across the South West over Easter - trains in pictures
[53] Destination: London Travelcard Zones 1-6
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Is Highways England the best guardian for rail heritage and dormant resource?  (Read 19653 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43848



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2022, 11:21:01 »

From New Civil Engineer

Quote
National Highways scrutinised over four more historic bridge infills

National Highways is under pressure over four more controversial bridge infills which were carried out to historic structures before the infamous Great Musgrave fallout.

Campaigners claim that National Highways failed to obtain relevant planning consents for work on four historic bridges which were infilled using emergency powers between January 2019 and May 2021. National Highways disputes the claims and believes it does have the necessary consents for the infillings.

The HRE Group – an alliance of engineers, sustainable transport advocates and greenway developers – claims that the infillings have “questionable legal status” and is urging the four respective local authorities to assess whether National Highways should be ordered to reverse the work.

If the councils do issue enforcement orders for the infills to be removed, costs are likely to run into the millions.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43848



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #31 on: October 15, 2023, 21:12:49 »

From Lancs Live

Quote
'Vandalised' Cumbria railway bridge reopens two years after filled in with concrete

A Victorian railways bridge has finally reopened two years after National Highways filled it with concrete. The act was branded 'cultural vandalism'.

The Great Musgrave Bridge near Warcop was filled in by the highway agency in July 2021. The decision was made after fears the bridge could collapse.

Thousands of tons of concrete were poured into the 161-year-old bridge costing a whopping £124,000. But opponents said the work was taken "without justification" and the filling in would stop the bridge being used by walkers and cyclists.

This is just one of dozens of bridges that campaigners argue were infilled or demolished with no consideration taken about their heritage value. More than 800 people objected and Eden District Council issued an enforcement notice in September last year after refusing retrospective planning permission.

After listening to campaigners, work to remove the concrete started in July and the archway has been restored to was it once one. The bridge opened on Friday at 6pm.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2139


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 16, 2023, 07:10:40 »

and the total cost to the tax payer?
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page