Ignoring the reference to AI as I always do (it could mean anything or nothing), is there anything new here? It's been offered as standard equipment for trains by several suppliers for ages - e.g.
Petards announcing their contract with Hitachi in 2016:
Petards announces that it has secured an additional framework contract and two “Call Off” contracts with Hitachi Rail Europe Limited to supply Automatic Passenger Counting Systems.
The new "Call Off" contracts are for the East Coast Main Line as part of the Intercity Express Programme and the Great Western Railway West of England service, the value of which are in excess of €1.2m and will be supplied over the next 3 years.
Commenting on the award, Petards Chairman Raschid Abdullah said;
"The board of Petards is delighted that we continue to develop our long term relationship with Hitachi. These two exciting projects further enhance our position as a leading supplier to the rail industry and strengthen the Group’s present order book for delivery in 2017, 2018 and into 2019.”
The
GWR▸ requirement for 165s and 166s was I think only giving information to staff. But the one for Hitachi was to meet the
IEP▸ requirement, and that did have to feed into the on-board
PIS▸ :
TS1931 The PIS must utilise the data from the passenger counting system to indicate to passengers within the IEP Train the status of the occupancy of each IEP Vehicle.
However ... despite APCS being described as mainstream kit, not in any way experimental, are any on-board systems actually working in the full sense - being seen by passengers who can make sense of what's shown, and trust it to direct them where to go to find emptier carriages? I don't believe the link to the PIS has been enabled on
IETs▸ .