Is it just me, or do others too see similarities between the Network Rails maps for next week and the maps we see in old reports such as "Beeching" and "Serpell"?
Isn’t it just that the busier routes tend to have the most modern signalling and are therefore easier to operate with fewer staff?
Or putting it another way - has the investment been on those routes, with the other routes being starved of parallel investment and now behind the times and hard to sustain.
The key strategic routes have not changed much over the decades, and yes investment does have a hierarchy based on key routes.
For the industrial action contingency planning point of view the primary and key routes will be the ones with centralised signalling centres anything that relies on older manual boxes or even some older Power Signal Boxes are difficult to staff