Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 10 Jan 2025
 
* Three teens arrested over boy's bus station death
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
23:03 Salisbury to Portsmouth & Southsea
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:52 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:38 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:33 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 18:38:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[97] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[91] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[81] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[38] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[20] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Rail link from Wichelstowe to Swindon (Railway Station)?  (Read 1681 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 21, 2019, 08:31:29 »

From the Swindon Advertiser - a call for rail rather than road connection for Wichelstowe - major new development area.

Quote
The Council for the Preservation of Rural England has criticised the plan to build a road under the M4 from the new housing development at Wichelstowe.

But the councillor in charge of the scheme says its needed because it allows easy access for new residents, and that’s important in attracting people to live in the town.

Swindon Borough Council will be constructing the road from the huge 4,500-home development through an underpass under the M4 to the south, where a new roundabout will be constructed. This will give access to Wharf Road to Wroughton, Hay Lane directly south and a road to junction 16 of the M4.

But the CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England) wanted a rail link from the area to Swindon railway station.

It said a rail bridge link "helps to regenerate the town centre, and provides a more direct route to the station."

And it claims a road link “ will generate longer local vehicle journeys through junction 16 between Wichelstowe and West Swindon and encourages car use along the motorway and more congestion, noise and pollution.”

But Gary Sumner, the borough council’s cabinet member in charge of strategic planning said the road was needed to attract people to Swindon, and particularly Wichelstowe.

I guess it depends on who you want to attract?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 21, 2019, 21:21:48 »

This area is on my patch. 

This is a development of 4,500 houses which unless this road is built will have only three ways out none of them at the west end of the development (West Wichel). If this road is not built then a large mixed residential commercial development of West Wichel would only have one access and only to the East. It would essentially be a very large cul de sac! 

Without this road traffic from west wichel would have to go 2 miles east before they could get out into the rest of Swindon or beyond and then this would then have to go out through heavily congested roads in Old Town, Wootton Basset Road or the not quite wide enough B road from Wroughton to Jn 16. The route out to Swindon via Wootton Bassett Road is intended to be bus only in the peak, but this cannot come into force untill another road is built. 

That is why the planning permission does not permit more than 1100 of the 4500 houses in Wichelstowe to be built until this new road is built. 

If the houses cannot be built then developers can continue to run roughshod over the Swindon local plan and get planning permission on unsuitable sites around Swindon.  I am sure that is not what CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England) want!

A station on the main line would be great it could provide a service to the west Swindon, however road access would be difficult from the North so it may have only pedestrian access from Toothill and Freshbrook limiting public transport connectivity.  Even if it could have proper access it could not replace the new road. 

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page