Bmblbzzz
|
|
« Reply #45 on: January 28, 2020, 09:36:40 » |
|
“It will also be a very light railway which will have minimal impact on the environment and encourage people to stop using their cars for commuting, so helping our commitment to combating climate change.”
I suspect "would" rather than "will".
|
|
|
Logged
|
Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #46 on: January 28, 2020, 10:19:37 » |
|
I also suspect business cases for lines that connect with other lines at each end, rather than branch lines, will be far better....the case for this one must be quite small
Relaying a track rather than adding trains to even a freight line is an extra hurdle. A line to a terminus rather than an end to end connecting service is an extra hurdle. Doesn't rule things out ... look at Tweedbank, but sure as heck makes it harder.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5450
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #47 on: January 28, 2020, 10:41:33 » |
|
... look at Tweedbank...
I'd say look at Stourbridge - a low-cost, low-energy shuttle service? Stourbridge is a town of 60,000 at the end of a 1km branch; Cirencester is 20,000 people 2km from the junction, so not directly comparable but not that different either!
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #48 on: April 22, 2020, 02:45:35 » |
|
I really do wish them all the best - but I honestly can't see it actually happening. They are apparently basing their projections (partly) on commuter demand? How many people actually commute from Cirencester towards London, never mind into London itself? And, from Tetbury?
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
infoman
|
|
« Reply #49 on: April 22, 2020, 05:36:15 » |
|
Maybe some one should do a survey on how many passengers join the direct trains to London at Kemble in the rush As well as the local trains from Kemble to Swindon,when everything settles down. Okay,I volunteer so If everything has settled down maybe september would be a good time
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #50 on: April 22, 2020, 07:33:15 » |
|
Maybe some one should do a survey on how many passengers join the direct trains to London at Kemble in the rush As well as the local trains from Kemble to Swindon,when everything settles down. Okay,I volunteer so If everything has settled down maybe september would be a good time
Kemble to London ticket numbers (up to March 2020) will be known already ... and there is a noticeable flow, I understand - witness the car parking. Looking back at circumstantial evidence over 20 years old, I recall comments about abandoned cars in station car parks at Kemble and Reading in the days after the Ladbroke Grove collision. But ... a noticeable number of passengers joining the hourly London peak train (and with current and full evidence) is far from a business case; it could be one small indicator of potential. A pity from the current shutdown is that the (Railfuture meeting) presentation at Kemble early this month didn't happen - but perhaps every cloud has a silver lining, as I couldn't make that day. I would love to see the case and the evidence presented. I have severe concerns, but might be surprised - and (even) should the total case be found wanting or incomplete, good elements may point a different way forward.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
patch38
|
|
« Reply #51 on: April 22, 2020, 10:42:15 » |
|
Maybe some one should do a survey on how many passengers join the direct trains to London at Kemble in the rush As well as the local trains from Kemble to Swindon,when everything settles down. Okay,I volunteer so If everything has settled down maybe september would be a good time
I think the real question is, of those who commute from Kemble to Swindon/London in the rush hour, how many of them come from Cirencester itself? My suspicion is that the majority (myself included) come from a wide geographical spread of villages rather than from central Ciren. Therefore, most will still drive the few extra miles and park at Kemble (especially now the overflow car park exists and is never full) rather than drive to an industrial estate on the edge of the town, park, and take a shuttle.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bmblbzzz
|
|
« Reply #52 on: April 22, 2020, 12:32:34 » |
|
A Ciren to Swindon shuttle might make more sense than one terminating at Kemble.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #53 on: April 22, 2020, 15:32:37 » |
|
I think the real question is, of those who commute from Kemble to Swindon/London in the rush hour, how many of them come from Cirencester itself? My suspicion is ....
A Ciren to Swindon shuttle might make more sense than one terminating at Kemble.
Questions at both ends. The Newquay branch has been reported as not generating bread and butter commuter traffic very well because it runs out at Par when people want to to to St Austell or Plymouth, and I question people from Cirencester wanting to change at Kemble. However, what I have read suggests a light rail solution, and I'm not sure about light rail vehicles mixing with heavy rail on the Kemble to Swindon run. Another example of trains that join the main line but (over the years) have been extended through ... trains no longer turn around at Dovey Junction ... Agree with the question of whether people would be in walking / cycling scope of Cirencester; I cannot see them driving and parking there to catch the train to Kemble when they could drive to Kemble - even if they drive past Cirencester Station. Now - there were two intermediate halts on the line. Wonder if the plan includes either of them?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
|
|
|
patch38
|
|
« Reply #54 on: April 22, 2020, 17:42:04 » |
|
Now - there were two intermediate halts on the line. Wonder if the plan includes either of them?
The halts were Park Leaze Farm (near Ewen) and Chesterton Lane. Well, Chesterton isn't on the new route (which skirts the proposed housing development there and then passes the Royal Ag, ending up almost where the original Cirencester Town station was) and a halt to serve a single farm seems unlikely. It looks like the Royal Ag would get its own halt though. It'll need plenty of parking for Range Rovers
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bmblbzzz
|
|
« Reply #57 on: January 20, 2023, 18:24:59 » |
|
First time I've heard a railway referred to as "single file".
|
|
|
Logged
|
Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
|
|
|
|