Chris from Nailsea
|
|
« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2017, 22:42:19 » |
|
Many thanks for your detailed insight post here, IndustryInsider.
|
|
|
Logged
|
William Huskisson MP▸ was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830. Many more have died in the same way since then. Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.
"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner." Discuss.
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2017, 08:44:13 » |
|
Also, if the GSM-R▸ radio is tied yup giving the driver non-urgent instructions, how would an emergency all-stop order get through at the same time? Slim chance, but it would eventually happen!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
JayMac
|
|
« Reply #17 on: January 24, 2017, 10:16:09 » |
|
GSM-R▸ is more than just two-way communication though. If it's being used to talk to a signaller for non-emergency reasons an 'all stop' message can still be transmitted or received.
Still doesn't mean GSM-R should be used for train running amendments from TOC▸ control though.
If that were to be wanted then I suspect a separate discrete system would need to be fitted. Something similar to the ACARS system fitted to commercial airliners, which allows airline ground staff to communicate with pilots, separate from ATC▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation." "Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot." "Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
|
|
|
ChrisB
|
|
« Reply #18 on: January 24, 2017, 10:21:32 » |
|
There would still be seconds delay I suspect if the driver was concentrating on listening to Control. Could be the difference....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #19 on: January 24, 2017, 11:26:06 » |
|
Believe me, you don't miss a GSM-R▸ emergency broadcast no matter what you're doing in the cab!
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
patch38
|
|
« Reply #20 on: January 24, 2017, 12:50:32 » |
|
If that were to be wanted then I suspect a separate discrete system would need to be fitted. Something similar to the ACARS system fitted to commercial airliners, which allows airline ground staff to communicate with pilots, separate from ATC▸ .
Isn't ACARS a text system rather than voice? I'm not sure a driver would be able to use that effectively. Don't forget a commercial aircraft has a pilot flying and a pilot not flying at all times so there's greater ability to handle messages too.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Western Pathfinder
|
|
« Reply #21 on: January 24, 2017, 17:40:53 » |
|
I had Allways thought that GSM-R▸ was in essence a mobile system that uses cells like a phone does so it should be able to receive a text message whilst making a call ? Please feel free to let me know if I am wrong
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tim
|
|
« Reply #22 on: January 24, 2017, 17:43:16 » |
|
I had Allways thought that GSM-R▸ was in essence a mobile system that uses cells like a phone does so it should be able to receive a text message whilst making a call ? Please feel free to let me know if I am wrong I'm sure that the driver can be reached (as a last resort the Guard could enter the cab with a message. It is just that under normal circumstances I expect that he can't be distracted whilst driving.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Zoe
|
|
« Reply #23 on: January 24, 2017, 17:58:49 » |
|
as a last resort the Guard could enter the cab with a message. That's not going to be easy on an HST▸ .
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bobm
|
|
« Reply #24 on: January 24, 2017, 19:54:50 » |
|
Believe me, you don't miss a GSM-R▸ emergency broadcast no matter what you're doing in the cab!
Presumably partly because it only springs into life when there is an emergency and not filled with general "chatter".
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Rhydgaled
|
|
« Reply #25 on: January 26, 2017, 14:21:06 » |
|
as a last resort the Guard could enter the cab with a message. That's not going to be easy on an HST▸ . I expect that would be easier than it would be for a guard to get into the cab of a class 91 on a moving IC225, which is also a High Speed Train (or is the MTU▸ engine so big you cannot walk past it even with ear defenders?). The IC125 I've driven on OpenBVE (a train simulator game) has a buzzer system though, so I assume the guard could buzz the driver to tell him/her to stop at the next station (in fact, come to think of it that must be how the driver knows if somebody wants to alight at a request stop, so to reinstate station calls the guard could simply buzz the code that means stop at the request stop).
|
|
|
Logged
|
---------------------------- Don't DOO▸ it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #26 on: January 26, 2017, 14:28:32 » |
|
Yes, driver-guard communication is fitted and in an emergency the guard could walk through the engine room - space around the engine isn't a problem (there's more room there than there is past the cooler group area), but it is rather loud so not ideal!
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
Oxonhutch
|
|
« Reply #27 on: January 26, 2017, 20:30:21 » |
|
Having squeezed my generous frame through a Class 31 and 37 engine room dead and stationary, I would hate to think what a Class 43 would be like at full pelt. There's likely to be some pretty hot bits too... ... in the dark!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
bobm
|
|
« Reply #28 on: January 26, 2017, 20:39:07 » |
|
I'm sure I remember reading somewhere there's an issue with walking through a Class 43 power car due to the fire suppression system installed.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|