Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:15 10 Jan 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 14/01/25 - Rail Sale starts
24/01/25 - Westbury Station reopens
24/01/25 - LTP4 Wilts / Consultation end
24/01/25 - Bristol Rail Campaign AGM 2025

On this day
10th Jan (2017)
Defibrillators discussion pack published by Network Rail (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:12 London Paddington to Bristol Parkway
16:32 Great Malvern to London Paddington
16:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:18 London Paddington to Swansea
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Additional 18:10 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
19:04 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
Short Run
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:20 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:15 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
17:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
17:52 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:38 Barnstaple to Exmouth
18:38 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
22:50 Salisbury to Portsmouth Harbour
Delayed
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:33 Barnstaple to Exeter Central
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 10, 2025, 18:18:51 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[103] Thames Valley infrastructure problems causing disruption elsew...
[98] Westminster Hall debate : Railway services to South West
[97] Ryanair sues 'unruly' passenger over flight diversion
[87] Mick Lynch announces retirement as head of RMT
[41] Birthday trip, Melksham to Penzance - 28th January 2025
[22] A Beginner's Guide to the Great Western "Coffee Shop" Passenge...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cost of single walk-on rail tickets to be slashed  (Read 3690 times)
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« on: September 17, 2013, 22:20:13 »

Cost of single walk-on rail tickets to be slashed

From the Daily Telegraph
Quote
The price of one way tickets is to be slashed by half under plans unveiled by Norman Baker, the rail minister
The Government is to end an anomaly that has left passengers paying almost as much for a one-way ticket as a return.
This will be done by controlling the price of off peak walk-on single fares rather than return tickets as is currently the practice.
Currently a one way off peak ticket to Birmingham is ^48, one pound less than the off peak return.
Under the new arrangements the price of a one-way ticket would fall to ^24.50, half the return fare.
A trial of the new arrangements will begin in 2015 on one of the long distance intercity routes. If successful it will be extended to the remainder of the network.

About time too.

Of course there is already a trial it is on FGW (First Great Western)!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2013, 22:35:12 »

Of course there is already a trial it is on FGW (First Great Western)!

Yes, indeed .. and I personally feel the FGW setup is a pretty fair and appropriate ratio between singles and returns.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 19245



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2013, 23:22:38 »

Although FGW (First Great Western) Super/Off Peak Singles aren't half the cost of the return. They were only at 50% for one fares round and are now 60-75% of the return. Since that one fares round the Singles have crept up and a higher percentage than the Returns.

FGW say on their website that, "Super Off Peak Single fares are also available at half the price of the Super Off-Peak Return, on many journeys."

That's just not correct. There are no flows where the Super Off Peak Single is half the price of the Return. There are also many flows where the singles (both Off Peak and Super Off Peak) are still priced at ^1 less than the return.

Then there are Day fares. The FGW priced Off Peak Day singles remain at around ^0.10 to ^1.00 less than the Off Peak Day Return.
Logged

"A clear conscience laughs at a false accusation."
"Treat everyone the same until you find out they're an idiot."
"Moral indignation is a technique used to endow the idiot with dignity."
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: September 18, 2013, 00:51:40 »


Of course there is already a trial it is on FGW (First Great Western)!

Yes, indeed .. and I personally feel the FGW setup is a pretty fair and appropriate ratio between singles and returns.

Although FGW Super/Off Peak Singles aren't half the cost of the return. They [are] 60-75% of the return.

My view is that it's fair and appropriate that returns are somewhat cheaper than singles each way.  60% to 65% feels about right.

Having the web site say it's 50% is incorrect and should be amended.

Having day returns just 10p to 1.00 less remains unfair and should be amended in line with the 60% to 65% 'standard'.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
Southern Stag
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 984


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 18, 2013, 07:49:37 »

But what about fares where there are both period and Day returns, the single fare can't be 60-65% of both. If the single is ^1 less than the Day return but 60-65% less than the period return that seems about right to me. One current such fares is Penzance-Plymouth:
Off-Peak Day Single: ^9.40
Off-Peak Day Return: ^9.50
Off-Peak Return: ^18.10

That seems fairly fair to me.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 43080



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: September 18, 2013, 12:08:10 »

But what about fares where there are both period and Day returns...

[snip]

Off-Peak Day Single: ^9.40
Off-Peak Day Return: ^9.50
Off-Peak Return: ^18.10

That seems fairly fair to me.

Hmmm ... I disagree, I'm afraid. If I travel from Plymouth to Penzance off-peak, and back by a train the same day, it costs 9.50 ... but if I stay overnight and travel back off-peak the next day it costs 18.10.  What possible justification is there for charging me nearly twice the amount for the return trip because it happens to be made a few hours later?

Perhaps I should have gone further in my original post / support of returns being around 60% of singles, and suggested that there should not be a day return - rather a period return that's valid for [time to be discussed - 8 days to 1 month].   

I have seen arguments earlier that it's hard to check return halves on short journeys, so they're just for a day.   But if the price of the return half goes up from 10p to five pounds, then you're not going to have the issue of lots of long-dated 10p tickets which would both tempt people to try it on, and at the same time cause staff and other travellers to get really upset about a potential fraud of travelling a day late.  A good way to stop a potential fraud is to redraw the system so that it's no longer worthwhile to do it - far better than fussing over enforcements on 10p fares!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, TravelWatch SouthWest Board Member
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4505


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 20, 2013, 21:04:56 »

I am with Grahame here. 

If you want to reduce fraud on long dated tickets you could always insist that the single is for the date it is to be used. 

Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page