Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 13 Apr 2025
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 15/04/25 - End, Rail Future consultation
15/04/25 - Everything Electric
16/04/25 - Walk from Chetnole
10/05/25 - BRTA Westbury

On this day
13th Apr (1854)
First (broad gauge) train ran complete line from Oxford via Worcester to Wolverhampton (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:36 Paignton to London Paddington
13/04/25 11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
13/04/25 12:30 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
13:02 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:21 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13/04/25 14:00 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
14:32 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
15:02 London Paddington to Plymouth
15:42 Exeter St Davids to Cardiff Central
13/04/25 16:35 London Paddington to Swansea
17:33 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
18:11 Castle Cary to Swindon
18:15 Penzance to Plymouth
19:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
19:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:29 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
20:00 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
20:17 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
20:26 Exeter St Davids to Bristol Temple Meads
21:36 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
Short Run
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
08:47 Penzance to Cardiff Central
09:18 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13/04/25 10:02 London Paddington to Penzance
10:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
11:27 Carmarthen to London Paddington
11:54 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
12:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:32 London Paddington to Paignton
13:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
13:41 London Paddington to Great Malvern
13/04/25 14:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
14:41 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:58 Cardiff Central to Penzance
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
16:47 Bristol Temple Meads to Castle Cary
16:58 Great Malvern to London Paddington
17:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
17:32 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
18:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
18:00 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
18:25 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
20:11 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
21:00 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
21:09 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads
Delayed
09:23 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:00 Cardiff Central to Exeter St Davids
12:41 London Paddington to Hereford
14:02 London Paddington to Penzance
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 13, 2025, 13:19:28 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[85] Great Western Railway: on-board catering, buffets, Travelling ...
[69] Northumberland Line to open on Sun 15 December
[55] Probably one of the ugliest dolls I have seen around
[46] New Oxford - Bristol direct service, ongoing developments and ...
[34] A36 Closed Limpley Stoke August to Spring 2025
[32] Delays on Devon services - merged posts, ongoing discussion
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Network Rail Strike Again  (Read 8426 times)
Andy W
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267



View Profile Email
« on: February 12, 2013, 18:02:29 »

http://www.worcesternews.co.uk/news/10222924.Henwick_Road_blocked/?ref=twtrec

Utterly useless shower

Complete dog's breakfast yesterday as well as last week's pantomine.
Logged
LiskeardRich
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3557

richardwarwicker@hotmail.co.uk
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 12, 2013, 18:13:01 »

talking of inappropriate pictures, looks like a traffic light to me
Logged

All posts are my own personal believes, opinions and understandings!
inspector_blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3574



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 12, 2013, 18:17:51 »

Utterly useless shower

Although presumably given that the crossing is designed to fail-safe with the barriers in the down position, not a 'shower' that would affect the train service too badly?

Of course it's not ideal, but the equipment did what it was designed to do in the circumstances: I have no idea of the geography of the area but are there really no alternative routes for motorists? Unfortunately NR» (Network Rail - home page) can't afford to have an S&T (Signalling and Telegraph) technician on standby at every level crossing and signal, particularly given the pressure post-McNulty to cut costs.
Logged
Andy W
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267



View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: February 12, 2013, 19:04:48 »

Utterly useless shower

Although presumably given that the crossing is designed to fail-safe with the barriers in the down position, not a 'shower' that would affect the train service too badly?

Of course it's not ideal, but the equipment did what it was designed to do in the circumstances: I have no idea of the geography of the area but are there really no alternative routes for motorists? Unfortunately NR» (Network Rail - home page) can't afford to have an S&T (Signalling and Telegraph) technician on standby at every level crossing and signal, particularly given the pressure post-McNulty to cut costs.
One problem is unfortunate like last week. Yesterday was a major problem - three indicates inadequate maintenance. I'm sure this is acceptable within the industry - look at the problems into / out of Paddington recently shows a company that does not achieve anything like acceptable standards to the rest of the community.
If Network Rail kit fails why on earth should the motorist be inconvenienced? Geography is irrelevant.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4531


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 12, 2013, 20:32:38 »

If Network Rail kit fails why on earth should the motorist be inconvenienced? Geography is irrelevant.


And why should Network Rail be inconvenienced when a motorist decides to jump or even crash through level crossing barriers or when a high sided lorry hits a bridge, like you say geography is irrelevant.

The incident outside London before Christmas I have seen the report on this the route cause may well be down to negligence by a contractor (cannot say more for obvious reasons)
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Andy W
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 267



View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: February 13, 2013, 14:28:43 »

And why should Network Rail be inconvenienced when a motorist decides to jump or even crash through level crossing barriers or when a high sided lorry hits a bridge, like you say geography is irrelevant.

When a motorist crashes into a bridge / crossing barrier they are breaking the law and can be successfully prosecuted. Network Rail close a road as a matter of proceedure because their equipment is faulty favouring the railway over the road. I have a lot of sympathy for problems that Network Rail have in terms of cable theft / suicides etc but there has been no demonstrable investment in the Worcester area for years. In fact the infrastructure was pilaged in the 70's by the railway authorities (the same people who have morphed into Network Rail)

Also AIUI ('as I understand it') track from Norton - Pershore is currently being replaced & rather than site it ready for re-doubling it is being laid in such a way that it would have to be re-laid when / if re-doubling ever occurs. This really disappoints me.
Quote
The incident outside London before Christmas I have seen the report on this the route cause may well be down to negligence by a contractor (cannot say more for obvious reasons)
Network Rail are ultimately responsible for appointing a contractor & should there be any problems you cannot simply abdicate responsibilty.
Logged
martvw
Full Member
***
Posts: 55


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: February 13, 2013, 22:16:38 »

I agree with Andy you would have thought that a bit of planning for the return of two tracks between Pershore and Worcester could have been posible. Worcesters rail network always seems to get as little as posible spent on it. No wonder there is trouble with outside toilets! sorry line side equipment .
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 13, 2013, 22:33:28 »

Remember that where lines have been redoubled (North Cotswolds and now starting on South Cotswolds) it takes several months of work to get to a point where the existing line can be slewed into a position compatible with a restored dual track formation. So it's not as easy (or cheap) as just relaying on a slightly different alignment.

I presume that by singling onto a central formation, maintenance on the shoulders of the track formation is reduced, and over time (40 years or so) this results in significant deterioration.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 10446


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 13, 2013, 22:36:14 »

I agree with Andy you would have thought that a bit of planning for the return of two tracks between Pershore and Worcester could have been posible.

I agree to a certain extent as well, though I think it's fair to point out that the section of track in question is quite awkward in that it is on a slightly elevated section with fairly difficult access, so if that track had been moved I would have thought some embankment strengthening would also have been needed.  Also, for the majority of the mile of track that was replaced the original track was slewed to one side with room for a second track, in other areas there is a small amount of lineside equipment that would have needed moving - nothing too major but it would have added to the cost.  The section that would need moving is around the point where it crosses the B4084.

It will appear a little short-sighted should Norton to Evesham redoubling suddenly jump up the NR» (Network Rail - home page) pecking order, but, if I suspect, it'll be at least ten years before it happens then perhaps it's understandable, if a little regrettable.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4520


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 13, 2013, 22:49:38 »

I did not think it was that difficult to slew track over.  You do not have to lift it and relay it surely.  So delaying the move until needed and when the inevitable embankment strengthening (aka 50 years back maintenance on earthworks) is complete.  Now if they were resignalling and putting the new cable runs and equipment cabinets in the way that might be different.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page