Some more facts gleaned from the Office of Rail Regulation (ORR^» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about))

Proposed disposals of land by Network Rail are regulated by ORR through condition 26 of its network license. The license condition is there to prevent disposals of land that might be needed for the future development of the railway network or for integrated transport purposes.

From 1 April 2008 the ORR have made some changes to the way in which this process works and now require Network Rail to undertake a wide stakeholder consultation before submitting its proposals to the ORR. When making its submission, Network Rail must ensure that the views of stakeholders are no more than six months old and that they have been reasonably resolved. The ORR have established the stakeholders they would expect Network Rail to consult but have not specified how long they should take to consult them. Network Rail must provide evidence of the stakeholders' views in making its submission to the ORR. The ORR will evaluate whether Network Rail has undertaken an effective consultation when they make their decision and may ask them to consult further stakeholders. The details of the process are set out further in the ORR Regulatory Arrangements document.....

http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/upload/pdf/361.pdf

The ORR believe the process is fair and transparent and they would expect Network Rail to consult widely. This includes train operators such as South West Trains (SWT^▸ (South West Trains)), the Department for Transport who set the terms of the SWT franchise, Passenger Focus who represent the views of passengers and County and District local authorities who consider transport strategy and planning issues respectively.

The ORR have asked Network Rail whether it has any plans to dispose of land at Weymouth and they have stated that an area of land fronting Weymouth Station and providing a taxi rank and pick up/drop off area is under consideration for redevelopment in conjunction with Dorset County Council as a transport interchange. The proposals are still in their infancy and consultation will take place as required.

Many thanks for the welcome message.

In return here is another interesting link....

http://www.networkrail.co.uk/browseDirectory.aspx?dir=\Network+Code\Network+Change\Completed+Proposals\Wessex\NCG12007WESX001+Weymouth+Tramway+OOU++(temporary)&pageid=0&root=

Sorry it is so long - I hope it works.

If not then to outline the contents, these are the letters between Network Rail and SWT^▸ (South West Trains), First Engineering and Freightliner Group all of whom were consulted about the temporary closure of the Tramway. First Engineering and SWT had no comment or objection but Freightliner were quite scathing in their comments  about the whole process that allows Network Rail to carryout temporary closures in this way and expects Network Rail to open discussions with them about any temporary closures before the end of the period.

I wonder if that has happened?

It's not gone yet and nothing is impossible if enough people show their support.

Here are some useful links

http://www.weymouth.gov.uk/home.asp?sv=1234

Then search for 'Weymouth Tramway'.

And for the organisation that should be listening to our concerns.....

http://www.rail-reg.gov.uk/

My main concern is that the correct procedure should be followed. The Weymouth Tramway is a passenger and freight carrying part of the National Rail Network. The License which Network Rail have been granted has a clause in it concerned with the disposal of network 'land' and this process must involve the Office of the Rail Regulator in any final decision making.
In the case of the Weymouth Tramway there is no land to dispose of so Network Rail may feel that they don't have to involve the ORR^» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about), however in their license the term 'land' is described and includes 'rights in or over land'.
It is important that no shortcuts are taken and that all those affected have their say.
Personally I feel it would be shortsighted if the 'grandfather rights' which enable  the Tramway to operate were given away before it was decided what to do with it. To resurrect the line afterwards would involve lots of new legislation and vast amounts of unnecessary paperwork.

Of course there is another side to this. Network Rail are obliged to maintain their assets so why have they let the Tramway deteriorate (if indeed they have) to a point that the Tramway has been temporarily closed for 2 years and so no operator could use it if they wanted to!
Do I smell a rat?

The world is changing. Lets not make it too difficult for those who may need this Tramway in the future!