Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 02:15 07 Mar 2025
 
* Flights halted at some Florida airports over SpaceX debris
- Teen armed with gun overpowered by passengers onboard plane
- Worst train stations for cancellations named and shamed for first time
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 13/03/25 - Community Rail Awards
19/03/25 - WWRUG AGM
19/03/25 - Forum offline 00:00 - 02:00
21/03/25 - TWSW General Meeting

On this day
7th Mar (1966)
Passenger services withdrawn from Wilton South (link)

Train RunningNo cancellations or delays
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 07, 2025, 02:23:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[200] The LNER Azuma experience
[88] Looe timetable changes this Summer
[44] Most remote stations....
[38] Over the country towards Skye
[25] Coffee Shop offline early on 19th March 2025
[23] "Worst railway stations named and shamed for first time"...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
  Home Help Search Calendar Login Register  
  Show Posts
Pages: [1]
1  Sideshoots - associated subjects / Campaigns for new and improved services / Re: Campaign for Tavistock reopening on: September 05, 2014, 19:53:09
Can never understand how a double track formation, with plenty of room for a single track railway and a cycle way, can take so long to reopen. 2019??? Unbelievable Jeff Roll Eyes No wonder not everyone takes proposed English re openings that seriously as it stands, and I for one, want this one to really happen

There are many factors why the line to Tavistock cannot accommodate either a double track or a cycle track alongside a single line, despite being a former twin track line.

When the line was first built, I doubt there was much in the way of track & land drainage. There's evidence within the tunnel of some drainage. Within the cuttings, it is proposed drainage runs are installed on both sides of track to prevent flooding. The pipework and catchpits take up considerable space.

Secondly, there was little or no provision for maintenance staff to walk the track in a place of safety while trains run. It is proposed a safe cess walkway will be installed along the entire length of the route.

Additionally the steep rock faces in the cuttings are unprotected. A rockfall would spill onto a twin track railway and could result in derailment and serious injury. To put protective netting along all faces would cost millions. By only reinstating a single track, the alignment can be designed so it lies away from potential rock fall zones, minimising the amount of rock netting required.

It is cheaper for Devon CC to provide a cycleway on an alternative alignment away from the railway than it is to rock-net the whole route. There is however one area where it may run adjacent the track.

The delay to any major engineering scheme is more down to planning and finance rather than technical reasons.
 
Pages: [1]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules via admin@railcustomer.info. Full legal statement (here).

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page