Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => Shorter journeys in Plymouth and Cornwall => Topic started by: FarWestJohn on November 18, 2011, 11:03:49



Title: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: FarWestJohn on November 18, 2011, 11:03:49
I took some friends into Truro on Wednesday for the 'Festival of lights'. Everyone was asked to use public transport if possible.
The journey on the way in was a 153 unit and packed as usual with no chance of buying a ticket. There were two staff at Truro barriers selling tickets but still a large queue to get out.

On the return we went to get the 2105 train, a 150/1 and even at 2055 we were told it was too full to get on. A coach was arranged which was far too small and dozens were left behind and only the last train at 2208 with an hour wait in a desolate station.

Why could not the 153 have been coupled to the 150 when the half hourly service finished as it was well known in advance to be a busy evening as will the next six Wednesdays up to Christmas?

Or is this because a 150/1 does not have a gangway? We are normally told the trains are too crowded as there are no spare units but in this case there was one not being used.

A real shame as yet again another example of First leaving a great number of angry people when they could
have done well.

Not impressed at all.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: Andy on November 18, 2011, 11:31:08
Forgive my ignorance as an outsider but whose decision would it be to authorise the addition of an extra carriage/unit in this case? What are the procedures for requesting and authorising additional stock?
 


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: paul7575 on November 18, 2011, 11:51:24
Theoretically FGW can just go to a leasing company and ask for more stock, but it isn't that simple.  Even if  suitable rolling stock was available 'off the shelf', the DfT have to agree the use of additional stock on such routes, firstly because they'll need an additional operating subsidy, and secondly because when considered on a national basis there is hardly ever any spare stock to obtain in the first place, and there may be competing needs elsewhere.

Fortunately there are all of 8 carriages of 150 stock currently up for grabs, so only my first reason applies...

Paul


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: marky7890 on November 18, 2011, 12:22:34
For the Tall Ships in Falmouth a few years ago I think a 150+153 were coupled, although this was before the loop at Penryn. Also I'm sure a 150+153 would fit on the new platforms at Penryn.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: fatcontroller on November 18, 2011, 13:20:11
The 3-car formation will fit along the route however, having run independently throughout the day there is no time in the layovers at Truro for the two units to couple up without incurring delays.

If it was to happen it is not a simple case of the second unit running in to Truro "on top" of the other unit to couple as the Signalling does not allow for a passenger train to come into any of Truro's platforms whilst another train is in the platform.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: SandTEngineer on November 18, 2011, 19:29:23
If it was to happen it is not a simple case of the second unit running in to Truro "on top" of the other unit to couple as the Signalling does not allow for a passenger train to come into any of Truro's platforms whilst another train is in the platform.

Er not quite true ::).  The Falmouth Branch home signal lever 13 is a draw ahead signal that reads up to 14 shunt signal that leads to all three lines in the station.  There are no track circuit clear controls in 14 signal so in theory a train can pass the branch home and proceed into any platform occupied.  Not sure though if the Truro signalbox instructions authorise (or prohibit) this for a passenger move.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: Andy on November 18, 2011, 21:01:04
Theoretically FGW can just go to a leasing company and ask for more stock, but it isn't that simple.  Even if  suitable rolling stock was available 'off the shelf', the DfT have to agree the use of additional stock on such routes, firstly because they'll need an additional operating subsidy, and secondly because when considered on a national basis there is hardly ever any spare stock to obtain in the first place, and there may be competing needs elsewhere.

Fortunately there are all of 8 carriages of 150 stock currently up for grabs, so only my first reason applies...

Paul

Thanks for the explanation. In the scenario outlined by the original poster, with a FGW carriage at Truro, available and empty, whose decision is it to authorise the addition/use of the extra carriage?


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: FarWestJohn on November 21, 2011, 13:39:32
I am sure I have seen a 150 arrive in the up platform at Truro and then a 153 couple up to the rear from the sidings in very quick time and then head off towards Plymouth.

Could not a Falmouth train come into the up platform and a 153 be attached from the siding as above. Then it should be able to return to Falmouth with the new Semaphore that allows trains to depart from the up platform in the down direction?


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: fatcontroller on November 21, 2011, 18:18:12
If it was to happen it is not a simple case of the second unit running in to Truro "on top" of the other unit to couple as the Signalling does not allow for a passenger train to come into any of Truro's platforms whilst another train is in the platform.

Er not quite true ::).  The Falmouth Branch home signal lever 13 is a draw ahead signal that reads up to 14 shunt signal that leads to all three lines in the station.  There are no track circuit clear controls in 14 signal so in theory a train can pass the branch home and proceed into any platform occupied.  Not sure though if the Truro signalbox instructions authorise (or prohibit) this for a passenger move.

As you say - not permitted as a passenger move.

Hence that is why I wrote exactly what I did.

Anyways - we're both right!


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: fatcontroller on November 21, 2011, 18:22:31
I am sure I have seen a 150 arrive in the up platform at Truro and then a 153 couple up to the rear from the sidings in very quick time and then head off towards Plymouth.

Could not a Falmouth train come into the up platform and a 153 be attached from the siding as above. Then it should be able to return to Falmouth with the new Semaphore that allows trains to depart from the up platform in the down direction?

yes it should be able to do this.

Obviously for it to be planned there are minimum time allowances given (even if in practice it can be done quicker) such as for the attachment. I believe attaching a set is 4 minutes, that along with changing ends, ensuring the Up platform is available at the time that the attachment is to take place does add the time that would then delay the next service unless the timetable gets recast for the rest of the evening, which then adds the complexity of connections into the main line.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: eightf48544 on November 22, 2011, 08:48:32
We seem to have forgoten how to run a railway. We were banging trains together every half hour at numerous places on the Southern in the 60s and that was with manual  couplings in lot of cases not auto coplers. And even if it was buckeyes you still had to connect the jumpers and brake pipes. 4 minutes would have seemed an eternity.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: vacman on November 22, 2011, 12:19:00
Just been annonced that it wil be 2x 2 cars from Dec.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: inspector_blakey on November 22, 2011, 23:01:32
We seem to have forgoten how to run a railway. We banging trains together every half hour at numerous palces on teh soutnern in teh 60s and that was with manual  couplings in lot of cases not auto coplers. And even if it was buckeyes you still had to connect the jumpers and brake pipes. 4 minutes would have seemed an eternity.

Really...? Four minutes for a screw coupling/brake pipes/jumpers and the requisite brake continuity test seems remarkably tight to me, certainly not an eternity.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: LiskeardRich on November 24, 2011, 19:23:12
Just been annonced that it wil be 2x 2 cars from Dec.

can you confirm your source for a december start to 2x2 cars. All local publicity here states Spring 2012.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: old original on November 24, 2011, 21:30:38
I have heard from local staff that it will be 1 x 150 and 2 x 153 from the new timetable, but the timing seems to contradicted FGWs announcement.. we'll see in due course


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: vacman on November 24, 2011, 22:59:46
Just been annonced that it wil be 2x 2 cars from Dec.

can you confirm your source for a december start to 2x2 cars. All local publicity here states Spring 2012.
I believe the St Ives will be a 153 until spring when the extra unit arrives.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: LiskeardRich on November 24, 2011, 23:32:13
so will it just be a swap for st ives 150 for now? Falmouth packet, bbc cornwall all quote FGW saying the extra carriage will be on Falmouth branch from May, until then they quote that there will be 1 150 and 1 153 as it is now!


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: phile on December 24, 2011, 16:22:11
I was wondering, please, if the Falmouth Branch is actually being worked by 2 pairs of 153s since the December Timetable change or is there a 150/1 or 150/2 involved.   If the case, which diagram ?


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: FarWestJohn on December 24, 2011, 17:53:17
I only noticed one train this afternoon and it was a single 153.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: old original on December 24, 2011, 19:23:40
The standard working should now be 1 x 150 (of whichever flavour) and 2 x 153, with 1 x 153 working the St Ives branch, except during the Christmas hols where the StIves will take one of the 153's as it's deemed to be busier.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: phile on December 24, 2011, 20:52:15
That answers the question of only 1 X 153 on one of the Falmouths today due to going onto St Ives.   Is the 150 on the early (19xx) finish or the late one ?


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: LiskeardRich on December 24, 2011, 21:37:54
On the days I travelled in the last fortnight there has been a 150 on the xx50 (approx, not sure of exact min) from truro, and a pair of 153s on the xx20 (approx) from truro


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: phile on December 24, 2011, 21:54:59
Thanks for that


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: vacman on December 30, 2011, 20:32:14
I expect the St Ives will be 2 cars tomorrow night due to the New Years festivities, St Ives is meant to be in the top ten of venues for New Years!


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: smokey on January 02, 2012, 13:42:24

On 31st December the 18.50 Penzance to St Ives, was indeed a 150, and good job too as the Service left Penzance Full and Standing.

At St Erth many minutes were lost as Most alighted at St Erth looking for the St Ives connection.
Yes St Ives was and is an interesteng place to be on New Years Eve.

Whilst the St Ives had been stood down to a class 153 (since the Dec T/T change), to release a 150 to make all the Falmouth trains two car, it appears the Rail Partnership has some input and during School Holidays and hence University hols the St Ives will be a Class 150 and Falmouth a Class 150 and 153 service.


Title: Re: Falmouth branch overcrowding
Post by: vacman on January 02, 2012, 21:51:48
Whilst the St Ives had been stood down to a class 153 (since the Dec T/T change), to release a 150 to make all the Falmouth trains two car, it appears the Rail Partnership has some input and during School Holidays and hence University hols the St Ives will be a Class 150 and Falmouth a Class 150 and 153 service.
the fal will be 2x2 car from feb along with st ives being 2 car, is whilst the remainer of the 150/1's are refreshed.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net