Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => Shorter journeys in South and West Wales => Topic started by: anthony215 on November 10, 2011, 20:04:57



Title: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: anthony215 on November 10, 2011, 20:04:57
Seems that 175110 has caused caos at Manchester Piccadilly during rush hour tonight after suffering a serious engine fire.

Hopefully they will be able to get this unit repaired with a replacement engine and back into service soon. 

Of course they  could perhaps depending on which carriage was involved insert the centre carriage into 1 of the 2 carriage 175's like they did with 175005 last year.


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: inspector_blakey on November 10, 2011, 21:03:24
Hmm. Catching fire seems to be a bit of a habit for Alsthom-built DMUs, doesn't it?


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: anthony215 on November 10, 2011, 21:40:00
 I know, although I thought it would have stopped somewhat considering the 175's have only just had an overhaul.

This is certainly going to cause some headaches for ATW


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: anthony215 on November 10, 2011, 21:56:30
Just read on uk railforums that smoke etc came from the rear carriage just after the train had been loaded with passengers


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on November 10, 2011, 22:19:08
must have caused major disruption being on platform 14 one of only two lines that go threw the station, i cant remember if 13 is bi directional but eather way would have had a huge impact


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: anthony215 on November 10, 2011, 22:45:59
must have caused major disruption being on platform 14 one of only two lines that go threw the station, i cant remember if 13 is bi directional but eather way would have had a huge impact

Seems a lot of trains were being turned back at Oxford Road with some passengers traveling to Crewe then getting the shuttle or VT service to Chester


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: inspector_blakey on November 10, 2011, 23:33:48
I know, although I thought it would have stopped somewhat considering the 175's have only just had an overhaul.

Did the overhaul consist of much work below the solebar, or was it mainly an interior refurbishment?


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: JayMac on November 10, 2011, 23:55:24
From the Manchester Evening News (http://menmedia.co.uk/manchestereveningnews/news/s/1464824_fire-on-train-at-manchester-piccadilly-causes-rail-delays):

Quote
Fire on train at Manchester Piccadilly causes rail delays

Fire crews have tackled a fire onboard a train at Piccadilly station. The blaze broke out at the service on platform 14 at 5.55pm today.

A GMFRS spokesman said there were no reports of any injuries.

Crews using breathing equipment were fighting the fire, which is believed to have been caused by hydraulic oil. Three appliances have been dispatched to the station.

All routes through Piccadilly station are suffering delays of up to 45 minutes and these delays are expected to last until approximately 20:00.

Network Rail said the platform and the adjacent 13 had been immediately evacuated.

A spokeswoman said: "Fire crews were called to deal with a fire onboard a train at Piccadilly station. It was the 1750 service from Manchester Piccadilly to Llandudno which was stood on platform 14. The train was immediately evacuated and no passengers were injured. Platforms 13 and 14 were also evacuated."

Fire crews spent an hour extinguishing the blaze. A train driver was given oxygyen as a precaution but did not need hospital treatment.

Trains were prevented from entering the station during the drama, with a tailback of services across the lines for several miles.

A fire brigade spokesman said: "It appears that hydrostatic oil in the engine compartment of a diesel engine has caught fire.^

There were reports on some delayed services of passengers forcing open doors and walking towards the tracks.

One passenger on board a Leeds to Liverpool service said: "No one on our service did anything like that. But there were warnings on our tannoy that passengers in trains further up the line were leaving the carriages and walking down the line."


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: anthony215 on November 11, 2011, 00:13:41
I know, although I thought it would have stopped somewhat considering the 175's have only just had an overhaul.

Did the overhaul consist of much work below the solebar, or was it mainly an interior refurbishment?

No I think the units had a full refurbishment to improve reliability. I am sure it was rail magazine or modern railways which did a full article with some pics showing a 175  undergoing a overhaul.


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: northwesterntrains on November 11, 2011, 09:43:45
must have caused major disruption being on platform 14 one of only two lines that go threw the station, i cant remember if 13 is bi directional but eather way would have had a huge impact

Yes both 13 and 14 at Piccadilly at bi directional.  There is also the option of using 14a for trains coming from Oxford Road and going back there, without continuing to the Airport etc.

However, the area was closed off while emergency services dealt with the situation so no trains could run between Piccadilly and Oxford Road until it was declared safe.


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: Tim on November 11, 2011, 11:18:32
quite a disruption.  I think I would have been tempted to walk between the two stations


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: northwesterntrains on November 11, 2011, 16:01:49
The problem would be for people on services approaching Piccadilly from the South and East that were due to continue Northwards or Westwards. If you've come from York and planning to go to Liverpool then you find yourself on a stopped train somewhere between Stalybridge and Piccadilly so you can't alight and walk.


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on November 11, 2011, 18:02:33
Did anything get pushed up via Denton and Victoria


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: northwesterntrains on November 12, 2011, 11:57:41
Did anything get pushed up via Denton and Victoria

Unlikely.  Given that only Northern Rail crews would sign that route it rules out most through services going that way.

The Wigan Wallgate to Buxton service that departs Piccadilly at 18:21 would probably have been the only service that could have usefully gone that way while platforms 13 and 14 were closed at Piccadilly.  However, when you consider:
* The Buxton passengers would have been at Deansgate, Oxford Road and Piccadilly not Victoria
* There may not have been a path or a through platform available at Victoria
* A crew change may have been required to send it that way, if the crew working the service didn't sign the Denton line
It's probably unlikely the Denton line was used.  It's more likely that service would have been terminated at Oxford Road and restarted from platforms 1-12 at Piccadilly, subject to an available unit and if no available unit then cancelled from Oxford Rd onwards.


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: Worcester_Passenger on November 12, 2011, 13:30:53
Did anything get pushed up via Denton and Victoria
Unlikely.  Given that only Northern Rail crews would sign that route it rules out most through services going that way.

I thought that the through services sometimes get re-routed through Manchester Victoria at weekends.

It does raise the question of knowledge of alternative routes. CrossCountry always seem to be very diligent about maintaining this knowledge - very early and very late trains sometimes follow some odd routes.

And a question about resilience, given the critical importance of those two platforms to the network in the North West.


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: northwesterntrains on November 12, 2011, 14:42:40
I thought that the through services sometimes get re-routed through Manchester Victoria at weekends.

Diverting via Victoria doesn't always mean using the Denton line.

TPE do divert via Victoria during engineering works but don't use the Denton line.  I don't think the Denton line is even cleared for 185s and 170s.

The TPE services from the Leeds direction would take to Victoria would be the same as Northern Rail's Huddersfield-Victoria stopper.  If it's an Airport service it would usually go to Salford, reverse, then go to the Airport via Piccadilly - which requires going through platforms 13 and 14 at Piccadilly.  If it's a Liverpool service it would go via Newton-le-Willows to Liverpool.

EMT and TPE services from the Sheffield direction would terminate short and have a replacement bus service.

Northern don't operate any services between Buxton/Hazel Grove and Preston/Blackpool on Sundays.  The through service they do operate is a Chester-Stockport-Southport service, which during engineering works they terminate short and run replacement bus services.

However, if engineering works occur on a Saturday or Bank Holiday affecting Stockport-Deansgate then Northern will run the services between Buxton/Hazel Grove and Preston/Blackpool via the Denton line and Victoria. 

The reason I said about it being unlikely that the Wigan-Buxton service would have used the Denton line is because it's either operated by a Picaddilly crew who don't sign the Denton line or there would be a crew change at Manchester Oxford Rd, so diverting via Victoria would cause crew problems, unless there was a spare crew at Victoria who sign both the Denton line and the Buxton line.

Quote
And a question about resilience, given the critical importance of those two platforms to the network in the North West.

To make matters worse long freight trains for Trafford Park have to pass through those two platforms.  GMPTE converted the alternative route to Metrolink!

That's precisely why there are plans to have platform 15 and 16 at Piccadilly.  Although, in a speech given in Leeds Ms Villers recently went in to detail about all the funding that had been spent on the rail - billions of it in London and then said the projects earmarked for the North will cost hundreds of millions, which we may not be able to find, meaning platforms 15 and 16 at Piccadilly may be at risk.  Although, eletrification projects are safe.


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: phile on November 12, 2011, 15:52:41
Does anybody know what actually happened to the TPE trains on the day and also Norwich to Liverpool EMT services


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: northwesterntrains on November 12, 2011, 16:16:18
Does anybody know what actually happened to the TPE trains on the day and also Norwich to Liverpool EMT services

The newspaper article posted by bignosemac gives the answer for TPE's Scarborough-Liverpool service.  Blackpool/Cumbria/Scotland to Manchester Airport services would have almost certainly terminated at Manchester Oxford Road and started their return working short. 

Other TPE services should have been able to run their full route but with delays.  Although, there was also a signalling problem near Huddersfield at the same time so some of the North TPE services may have terminated short due to running very late.


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: anthony215 on November 13, 2011, 12:01:34
From whats been said on WNXx its sounds as if 175110 is getting a new engine etc and should be back in services around 20th november


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: 6 OF 2 redundant adjunct of unimatrix 01 on November 13, 2011, 18:55:05
always been against converting heavy rail to metrolink! takes away any possibility of taking freight off the roads and back onto rail


Title: Re: ATW class 175 on fire at Manchester Piccadilly
Post by: eightf48544 on November 14, 2011, 11:12:57
Stupid thing is you don't have to convert run dual voltage trams for passenger and heavy rail as required. It may be sensible to lower the station platforms but not necessarily if you are happy with platforms in the middle of your town as Manchester.

Go to Karlsruhr, Kassel for trams, ICEs, ICs, RE, RB,  freight trains plus even teh occsional stam special sharing teh same tracks.

But my favurite is Norhausen.

Meter gauge regular 1897/195X steam locos,  198X diesel railcars, 2002 ED trams which run over the town network under electric power.

Plus coverted standard gauge diesel locos hauling 4, loaded 100 tonne standard gauge bogie ballast hopper wagons on rollboks.

Now thats how to use a railway line.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net