Title: Twyford overshoot Post by: Boppy on September 07, 2011, 09:59:06 Anybody else "enjoy" the 18.47 from London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa missing it's first stop at Twyford by one train length last night?
Pretty unlucky I thought as the driver must have realised slightly too late and was unfortunate enough that the last carriage door was just beyond the platform. In the end it took about 15minutes to get things sorted so we could reverse back into Twyford before continuing on to Reading. I take it from this occurrence that the signals aren't set in a way to force the train to stop at Twyford - it's just up to the driver to remember that the first stop is Twyford rather than Reading? Boppy. Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: eightf48544 on September 07, 2011, 10:56:32 Stopping is down to driver, the signal at Twyford which used to be half way down the platform (is it still there?) would more than likely be at green. Previously when under Reading it would have run auto most of the time now under Didcot the ARS would heve cleared it ready.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: Boppy on September 07, 2011, 14:22:48 Ah thanks eightf48544.
So are there any aids to remind a driver to stop at a particular station or does a post-it note in the drivers cab suffice?! I assume there is an official route calling list, diagram or something? Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: ChrisB on September 07, 2011, 14:34:52 the have a service card, showing station calls and times.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: devon_metro on September 07, 2011, 16:45:30 Might have been a problem with rail adhesion. Tress are starting to shed their leaves already!
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: ChrisB on September 07, 2011, 16:46:56 not a whole train length, surely? That's some slippage?
Unfortunately, it seems to me that the driver forgot he was stopping there.... Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: quedgeley2002 on September 07, 2011, 20:35:59 I was on the 1847 last night as well through as far as Stonehouse and got chatting with the Train Manager about the incident.
This particular train is crewed from Swansea depot and is apparently the only trip on any of that depot's rosters that requires a Twyford stop. With 40 or so drivers at that depot the opportunity to drive the 1847 doesn't come around that often. It would seem that whilst the driver knew he needed to make the stop he simply misjudged the stopping distances such that the rear power car was 10 meters beyond the platform end when the train came to a halt. In view of the view of the time involved in getting clearance to set back and the driver having to change ends twice to achieve this (i.e., to reverse and then go forward again) just about 30minutes was lost by the time the train got to Reading. I would have thought that FGW should have cut its losses and gone on to Reading with the Twyford passengers coming back on an alternative train as a number of following HSTs had been routed onto the slow lines around us. Quite what the cumulative delay penalties would be to FGW I don't know but presumably the driver would have been invited for a chat with his supervisor at the end of his shift? At least it added to the entertainment on what is normally an uneventful trip. Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: BBM on September 07, 2011, 21:06:07 Back in the spring of 2009 I was on the 17:06 which failed to stop at Twyford one evening, apparently it was simply the case the stop had been omitted from the timing sheet with which the driver had been issued. I didn't have to wait long at Reading for a Turbo back to Twyford.
But going much further back in time to about 1986, I remember I used to finish work at about 18:30 and I would get a loco-hauled service from Paddington at just after 19:00 which was first stop Twyford. I recall one night when that overshot Twyford by about a coach length but the driver simply reversed the train back into the platform with the minimum of fuss and delay. I think times have changed since then! Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: ChrisB on September 07, 2011, 21:29:08 With 40 drivers to keep up route familiarity, is once every 40 days the norm to keep up route knowledge? I think mot.
Who's rrsponsible for overseeing drivers route knowledge? Who wiuld the RMT complain to? Is there an authority for overseeing? Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: super tm on September 07, 2011, 21:33:23 Route knowledge is for a route. A swansea driver will come to london on average 4 out of 5 days. Stopping at individual stations is not a requirement to keep up your route knowledge.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: ChrisB on September 08, 2011, 09:18:19 thanks, didn't realise that.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: eightf48544 on September 08, 2011, 09:41:23 Back in my days on BR I was told anyone can start a train it's stopping it in the right place that's the skill. Seems things haven't changed.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: bobm on September 08, 2011, 13:04:58 Years ago I knew one of the signalmen who had worked at Twyford West box. He told a story of an evening rush hour in the 1930s when things went wrong nearer to London and the trains reached Twyford out of sequence. Unfortunately the message didn't reach the box or was misunderstood and the points were set to take a commuter service onto the Henley Branch. However a Cornish Express came in its place and the driver took the route. Thankfully he stayed on the rails going round the curve and after appropriate conversations were had he reversed back onto the main line and was away. Apparently the signalman was so ashamed at what he had done that he resigned the next day.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: dog box on September 23, 2011, 02:01:37 Drivers and guards are responsible for overseeing there own route knowledge, and 95% of Drivers are members of ASLEF
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: ChrisB on September 23, 2011, 08:44:05 Blimey! Isn't that open to abuse? Shouldn't it be independently chrcked?
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: IndustryInsider on September 23, 2011, 09:50:54 When it comes to route knowledge, a driver will 'learn' a route by taking a minimum prescribed number of trips over it. When they're ready, they will be assessed over it which will include a 'ride' with management and questions concerning the route. After that it's up to them to maintain their knowledge - the link they are in should have a minimum number of trips over that route in any given cycle to ensure that happens. They sign to say they're competent each year. If for some reason, a long sick lay off for example, they (or management) feel that their knowledge may have lapsed, then they get a refresher day, or sign off the route in question. It's not fixed in stone, but six months is often the point at which you'd apply for a route refresher day.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: eightf48544 on September 23, 2011, 13:30:06 That's why the Chiltern ghost train West Ruslip to Padd usually has more drivers than passengers!
Also re the signaman resigning at Twyford for wrongly routing a train. Thinking about it being block signalling it could have been the rear box wrongly belling the Is Line Clear. Presuably the Penzanace should have been 4 (express) and the Henley 1-3 (branch passenger). Don't which box change should change from 3-1 to 1-3 presumably Rushcombe as any branch train will need to be on the Relief after that. In my Aller Junction simulation Newton Abbot West bells 1-3 for all Torquay line passenger trains. You have to remember to bell Torre Box 4 for express or 3-1 for a stopper. Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: Maxwell P on September 23, 2011, 13:49:23 Don't know if it's universal, but in the West, routes questions are also tacked on at the end of Rules exams, which normally take place every 2 yrs.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: BBM on September 05, 2013, 08:15:06 Resurrecting an old topic, this morning's 0609 NBY-PAD overshot Twyford and came to a stand with the rear of the 180 about 100 yards beyond the end of Platform 2. After a minute or two it then continued towards London leaving the waiting passengers to cross over to Platform 4 for the next fast service.
Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: bobm on September 05, 2013, 08:18:48 Could have been a pretty empty train.
According to Journeycheck it didn't make its booked calls at Thatcham, Theale or Reading West because it was late from the depot. With missing the Twyford stop it only called at Newbury, Reading and London Paddington. (Unless it called at Maidenhead to drop anyone who wanted Twyford I suppose). Title: Re: Twyford overshoot Post by: BBM on September 05, 2013, 08:31:56 Could have been a pretty empty train. It was indeed very empty (I could see only 2 people in the front coach) and missing out earlier stops would explain why! This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |