Title: Rail passengers 'more satisfied' (BBC News 22/06/2010) Post by: JayMac on June 22, 2010, 18:48:16 From the BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/10376558.stm):
Quote Rail passengers are growing more satisfied with train travel, according to a national passenger survey by rail customer watchdog Passenger Focus. Some 83% of the 31,000 rail users questioned were happy with their rail journey - a 2% rise since spring 2009. However, less than half - 48% - felt their rail ticket was value for money, although this was up from 40%. Passenger Focus said passengers were "more satisfied", but the gap between good and weaker services was "wide". The survey found those satisfied with punctuality and reliability had risen from 80% in spring last year to 82% in spring 2010. It also revealed that satisfaction with the comfort of carriages - whether there was sufficient room to stand or sit - was up from 66% to 68% over the same period. However, passengers continued to have concerns with the industry's handling of delays, with satisfaction levels in this category unchanged at just 35%. Where individual train companies were concerned, the Wrexham & Shropshire company had the highest overall satisfaction figure - of 99%. Grand Central and Merseyrail also scored highly, with satisfaction rates of 94% and 93% respectively. Meanwhile, the lowest ratings for overall satisfaction was given to London Overground, at 72%. First Capital Connect and National Express East Anglia also scored poorly - with respective satisfaction figures of 76% and 77%. Commenting on the findings, Passenger Focus chief executive Anthony Smith said: "As more trains arrive on time, Britain's rail passengers are becoming more satisfied. Last year's inflation figure halted the normal New Year season ticket price hike which improved many train companies' value for money scores. However, the gap between the good and weaker performers remains wide." Meanwhile, Office of Rail Regulation chairman Anna Walker said that although it was "positive" to see "good levels of passenger satisfaction", it was clear that "passengers continue to voice familiar concerns". "They are still dissatisfied with facilities and services at stations and on trains, the availability of staff and how well train companies deal with delays," she said, adding that "current satisfaction levels fall far short of where they need to be". Similarly, Gerry Doherty, leader of the TSSA rail union, said: "The key finding is that fewer than half of passengers believe their journey represents value for money. This is because we still have the most expensive rail fares in Europe under the system whereby private train operators put shareholders' interests ahead of passengers'". The lasted passenger satisfaction survey in detail can be found at the Passenger Focus (http://www.passengerfocus.org.uk/) website. Click on the "National Passenger Survey Spring 2010 (22.06.2010)" link under "Latest Publications" on the homepage. Title: Re: Rail passengers 'more satisfied' (BBC News 22/06/2010) Post by: inspector_blakey on June 22, 2010, 19:13:47 Or, in an interesting compare and contrast exercise, the same story from the Daily Telegraph (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/road-and-rail-transport/7846396/Train-travel-poor-value-for-money-say-passengers.html), headlined "Train travel poor value for money say passengers". Gotta love the journalists ;)
I wonder if the Daily Mail has yet managed to include trains in its ongoing epidemiological study to catergorize everything on the face of the earth into things that either cause or cure cancer. Title: Re: Rail passengers 'more satisfied' (BBC News 22/06/2010) Post by: devon_metro on June 22, 2010, 19:22:13 'Improved satisfaction of disgruntled rail passenger might increase the risk of Cancer - says a report'
Title: Re: Rail passengers 'more satisfied' (BBC News 22/06/2010) Post by: JayMac on June 22, 2010, 19:52:37 Just waiting for the Dail Mail story, something along the lines of.......
"The latest rail passenger survey has seen improvements in satisfaction levels. However, many in middle-England are worried that an attractive, clean and reliable rail service may lead to an increase in immigration with a consequent knock-on effect for house prices." ;) :D Title: Re: Rail passengers 'more satisfied' (BBC News 22/06/2010) Post by: TerminalJunkie on June 22, 2010, 20:04:56 I wonder if the Daily Mail has yet managed to include trains in its ongoing epidemiological study to catergorize everything on the face of the earth into things that either cause or cure cancer. Googling for "reading the Daily Mail causes cancer" returns a curiously satisfying "About 1,550,000 results". 11th on the list (but it should really have been higher) was this: http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-evidence-aric-sigman-ignored/ (http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-evidence-aric-sigman-ignored/) Title: Re: Rail passengers 'more satisfied' (BBC News 22/06/2010) Post by: JayMac on June 22, 2010, 20:11:26 ...and at the risk of the topic degenerating into Daily Mail slanging, heres a list of the top 20 things the DM have said can cause cancer:
http://www.thedailydust.co.uk/2009/02/19/20-strange-things-the-daily-mail-say-will-cause-cancer/ Nearly all on the list can be crammed into one fun filled night. At your own risk etc..... :D Title: Re: Rail passengers 'more satisfied' (BBC News 22/06/2010) Post by: devon_metro on June 22, 2010, 20:40:16 ...and at the risk of the topic degenerating into Daily Mail slanging, heres a list of the top 20 things the DM have said can cause cancer: http://www.thedailydust.co.uk/2009/02/19/20-strange-things-the-daily-mail-say-will-cause-cancer/ Nearly all on the list can be crammed into one fun filled night. At your own risk etc..... :D Just thinking about such an action packed night is probably increasing my risk of cancer :D ;D Title: Re: Rail passengers 'more satisfied' (BBC News 22/06/2010) Post by: inspector_blakey on June 22, 2010, 20:41:31 11th on the list (but it should really have been higher) was this: http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-evidence-aric-sigman-ignored/ (http://www.badscience.net/2009/02/the-evidence-aric-sigman-ignored/) Ben Goldacre deserves a medal for his debunking of junk science in the media. A real shame that a few more of the fourth estate don't actually read what he has to say and take note! I trust you have read the Bad Science book, TJ...? Also refreshing that in situations like this he's not afraid to take some slightly dubious "popular" scientists to task too. I can't see many other journalists being that critical of their profession. This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |