|
Title: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: TheLastMinute on March 19, 2010, 12:08:08 Breaking news from BBC News:
Quote from: BBC News website Rail workers to take strike action Railway signal workers have voted in favour of strikes in a row over jobs, the Rail Maritime and Transport union has announced. The strikes threaten disruption to rail travel in the coming weeks, including over the Easter weekend. The RMT said 54% of its members backed strikes, with 77% supporting industrial action short of a strike. If walkouts go ahead it could potentially lead to the first national rail stoppage since 1994. Turnout in the strike ballot was 71%. Maintenance workers belonging to the RMT union have already voted to go on strike in protest at the 1,500 job losses at Network Rail. BBC chief economics correspondent Hugh Pym said the 54% was only a very narrow majority, which may lead the RMT to pursue a course to a negotiated solution to the dispute. . Hmm, 54% of union members voted for strike action - hardly a overwhelming majority! TLM (Quote updated @ 12:11 to reflect a later copy) Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: Phil on March 19, 2010, 13:34:26 Bob Crowe was, um, crowing about a 2/3 majority in favour on the lunchtime news.
Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: Timmer on March 19, 2010, 14:04:11 Bob Crowe was, um, crowing about a 2/3 majority in favour on the lunchtime news. He would. Bet the Tories are loving all this flexing their muscles by the unions so close to a general election.Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: moonrakerz on March 19, 2010, 14:39:19 The RMT said 54% of its members backed strikes, with 77% supporting industrial action short of a strike. The BBC says "54% of its members". The RMT website says something different: "RAIL UNION RMT announced this morning that a ballot for action of signalling and supervisory staff has returned a vote of 54% for strike action" Nice to see the Beeb keeping up its usual high standards of accurate and impartial reporting ::) ::) Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: inspector_blakey on March 19, 2010, 15:12:29 So does that mean that it's actually a 54% vote on a 77% turnout, in which case I make that less than 42% of RMT members voting for a strike...?
Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: JayMac on March 19, 2010, 15:16:05 Still, only 54% voted for a strike on a 71% turnout of signalling staff. So I make that just over 38% of the eligible voters saying yes to a strike.... hardly a ringing endorsement, but like our parliamentary electoral system sufficient for a large minority to drive the agenda.
Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: JayMac on March 19, 2010, 15:16:31 71% turnout of signalling staff, not all RMT members, blakey ;)
Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: TerminalJunkie on March 19, 2010, 16:03:16 Still, only 54% voted for a strike on a 71% turnout of signalling staff. So I make that just over 38% of the eligible voters saying yes to a strike.... 46% voted against on a 71% turnout; so only 32% of the eligible voters said no to the strike... </glass_half_empty> Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: JayMac on March 19, 2010, 18:32:09 And 29% sat on the fence/didn't bother/decided to go with the flow. :-\ ;) :D
Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: Henry on March 20, 2010, 08:25:31 I think the RMT realise they do not have a sufficient majority for effective strike action. Reports are that RMT and NR are to meet again. My sympathy lies with Network Rail, despite our 'privately' run railway, it is still the Government that hold the purse strings. Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: inspector_blakey on March 20, 2010, 19:03:56 The RMT press release detailing the results of the ballot seems to me to be rather less bullish than they often are - it would appear that there is a somewhat stronger mandate for "action short of strike" than for strike action.
Title: Re: Signal workers vote for strike action Post by: Henry on March 21, 2010, 07:25:35 Watching the BBC news last night, featured the violent clashes in Bolton between the English Defence League and Unite Against Fascism protesters. In my opinion seemed very little like a peaceful protest, more like an organised punch up. Unfortunately you could see a number of proudly waved RMT flags, which bearing in mind the potential industrial action, probably would not do a lot to gain the public sympathy (if there was any). This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |