Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Across the West => Topic started by: old original on February 05, 2010, 08:37:48



Title: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: old original on February 05, 2010, 08:37:48
Just reported on breakfast tv news...

Latest figures released shows the following Customer satisfaction ratings:

FGW     82%
XC       85%

HOW??!!??

Discuss....


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Tim on February 05, 2010, 09:19:59
One reason, I suspect, is that FGW carriers more commuters.  There is evidence that for whatever reason, commuters are more likely to be negative about their services than, for example, holiday makers. 


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Branch Line Connor on February 05, 2010, 10:17:20
Maybe passangers prefer to be crushed onto a little voyager? I totally disagree with the 'public' on this one. Arriva couldn't get me out of my front door.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Cornish Traveller on February 05, 2010, 10:50:35
also XC now operate some old Central trains routes such as Stansted Airport - Birmingham and have refurbised class 170 stock on them, which may balance out some negative responses ! 


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: IndustryInsider on February 05, 2010, 12:26:17
Or maybe, just maybe, the customer satisfaction ratings are really not that accurate.  Just like the average queuing at ticket office statistics, etc,


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Branch Line Connor on February 05, 2010, 12:29:00
XC Don't manage any stations. At some stations they are the sole caller though. When I go to Plymouth Station at peak times, the queues are big but I think they deal with it quite well.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Timmer on February 05, 2010, 17:22:07
From the FGW website:
http://www.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/NewsItem.aspx?id=635

Quote
Continuing efforts by First Great Western to improve its services have been recognised by customers, with more than 82 per cent saying they are happy with the company^s service.

Results of the National Passenger Survey (NPS), carried out by independent rail watchdog Passenger Focus in November last year, show a two per cent increase in satisfaction compared to the previous year (2008), and a ten per cent improvement since 2007.

Customers said First Great Western had shown improvements in many areas of the survey, including the helpfulness of staff, ticket buying facilities, train running information and how well the company deals with delays.

Over the last 12 months, 92.14 per cent of First Great Western services arrived on time, more than three per cent better than for the same period last year.

Just last month, during some of the worst weather conditions the region has seen in a generation, the company was able to keep 90 per cent of its services running for customers while other modes of transport struggled.

Scores improved in 25 of the 30 areas that the survey measures, with customers particularly noticing improvements in the availability and helpfulness of staff on trains, and the capacity on services.

The efforts of station teams also delivered improvements in customer information, cleanliness and the general upkeep of stations.

First Great Western Managing Director, Mark Hopwood, said: "These are fantastic results and I^m very proud of all my colleagues who have helped to achieve them. We are showing improvements in some key areas, but we still have work to do if we are to provide a truly exceptional service for all our customers.

^We have lots of exciting plans for 2010 and are confident that the current ^8million refresh of our turbo train fleet in the London and Thames Valley, which will be finished by March 2012, will increase our customer satisfaction figures even further. In the west of England we introduced some new journeys as well as extending existing ones when South West Trains^ services west of Exeter were removed at the end of 2009. And in Bristol we increased capacity on some morning and evening peak journeys at the end of 2009.

^Thank you to everyone at First Great Western for all your hard work over the last couple of years ^ it^s great to see it all paying off, and thanks to our customers who continue to travel with us.^




Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: inspector_blakey on February 05, 2010, 17:38:06
I don't know enough about the methodologies of the survey to decide, but I wonder if the 82% vs 85% difference is actually statistically significant.

Then again, despite what you might think from reading many posts on here, XC have their faults but they are not a total shower. I've had plenty of perfectly pleasant journeys with them, standard and first class, weekdays and weekends, peak and off-peak.

I would suggest there is one big difference between XC and FGW that affects public perception: FGW had a spectacular and well-publicized series of major foul ups as in 2006/7. XC have not (yet...) had anything like the a,ount of hegative publicity and news coverage that FGW attracted at that time. I suspect this tends to linger in people's minds, so it's very possible that the respondents to the survey had their opinions of FGW coloured by the state of things three or four years ago rather than currently.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: devon_metro on February 05, 2010, 17:57:43
The fact that FGW are classified as L&SE instantly tarnishes the reliance on the data in my opinion.

XC are far, far worse than FGW and I think you'd be pretty hard pressed to prove my opinion wrong.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Phil on February 05, 2010, 20:53:24
XC are far, far worse than FGW and I think you'd be pretty hard pressed to prove my opinion wrong.

I do love a challenge  ;D

I'd say the people of Chepstow are having a LOT more success talking to XC about improving services to their station than the good folk of Melksham are in getting FGW to listen let alone act.

So on that measure alone, I'd much rather have the option of XC trains serving my local station than FGW doing their best to avoid it.

Chepstow campaign link:

http://www.bettertrains4chepstow.co.uk/crosscountry.html

Aim of the campaign: to increase the number of trains stopping at Chepstow on weekdays from 28 to 56.

Population of Chepstow: 14,195

---------------------------------------

Population of Melksham: 21,000

Aim of Melksham's Campaign: to increase the number of trains stopping at Melksham on weekdays from 2 to 5 (!)



Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Bob_Blakey on February 05, 2010, 20:58:17
Perhaps I have just not been paying attention, and the campaign has actually been running for ages, but I did see an XC advert on one of the Murdoch,Inc. channels a couple of days ago. It was extolling the virtues of their Advance Fare price freeze - which would be fine if you could actually get hold of them for journeys north from Exeter. On my last 5 trips to Brum and beyond I have either had to combine FGW DIG-BRI & XC BRI-BHM tickets or travel via London to get what I regard as a reasonable fare.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: JayMac on February 05, 2010, 21:52:15
Not this passenger (not a bloody customer, particularly so in this instance).....

Want a coffee between Bristol Parkway and Taunton? No chance with XC. Travelling down last Saturday I noted that their was a crew change at Temple Meads and the off-duty 'Retail Services Manager' stayed on board along with the new RSM. Consequently they spent the whole journey to Taunton chatting away, along with the TM, in the end of Coach A instead of providing the service they are employed to do. I enquired as to why the handover took 50 mins (dwell time plus delay behind stopper) between Bristol and Taunton, when the shops used to reopen promptly after a crew change. Didn't get a satisfactory answer. Also asked why no announcement was made, about resumption of service. This led to 8 different people walking to the end of Coach A to find that catering was unavailable while the protracted handover took place. Asked for names, all refused, neither the TM (who also spent the 50 minutes in this 'staff meeting' instead of doing his job), RSM or off duty RSM were wearing name badges. E-mail complaint sent to XC and response yesterday (one thing they do better than FGW - response time!) basically summerised that the incoming staff should be able to resume trolley service 15 minutes after handover and they would look into why this hadn't happened on the service I used. Also told me that PA announcements should be made and that name badges should be worn at all times. I have been further promised a management response when the staff involved are identified.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: devon_metro on February 05, 2010, 21:58:26
Phil, I rather think the situation at Chepstow is entirely different, XC pass through there anyway, so stoppi g there isn't a massive effort, whereas melksham requires units and crew which don't exist at present..!


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: readytostart on February 05, 2010, 22:17:38
Not this passenger (not a bloody customer, particularly so in this instance).....

Want a coffee between Bristol Parkway and Taunton? No chance with XC. Travelling down last Saturday I noted that their was a crew change at Temple Meads and the off-duty 'Retail Services Manager' stayed on board along with the new RSM.

Stuff like this really p*sses oops, can't put that, um, gets on my nerves and gives the rest of us a bad name. Assuming it wasn't one of our elusive HSTs then the trolley handover should have taken place in F at the catering store so stocks can be checked in the fridge there. Even first class complimentaries should come off the trolley at the weekend so the RSM has no business hanging about the galley if they've not served the train. I personally will off drinks to first if I have time or if there's no catering on board, but don't go telling the managers that.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: JayMac on February 05, 2010, 23:09:30
Oops, meant coach F where the 'staff meeting' took place. I've down-traded when travelling XC. No incentive left to travel 1st class. Can't even walk to the shop to get me comp refreshements when I want them. The at seat service was sold to us as an improvement that pax asked for. Billhooks! A trolley that provides catering only when the staff can be bothered to offer it is no improvement over a shop. And if you are in 1st class without a dedicated host you are now more likely to be served after standard class passengers. And the choice on a 220/221 if you do get served is far worse than before. In fact it is better on the ex-Central services, who have larger trolleys.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: willc on February 05, 2010, 23:36:14
If anyone wants to peruse the full survey results, the pdf can be downloaded here http://www.passengerfocus.org.uk/news-and-publications/document-search/

Having actually filled in one of these survey forms - for the spring round last year - I have to say that of their kind they are pretty thorough and probably a bit better constructed than an FGW one I filled in last November. And the station ratings are based on the journey being made at the time you are surveyed. It doesn't discriminate on the basis of who runs those stations - so XC gets it in the neck for other operators' failings, or credit for their successes.

There is clearly an issue with lumping the whole of FGW's operation in as London and South East but the same goes for NXEA, with a similar mix of services on a smaller scale, which scored 79. FGW is actually spot on the average satisfaction rating for the category. And matters probably aren't helped by it operating probably the most tired-looking suburban fleet around London.

However, the only LSE operators that got a rating way above FGW were the Heathrow services, just shuttling up and down on a nice short route, c2c, with an effectively closed network, worked by a single type of train, and Chiltern, which again has an effectively segregated route for much of its network. The other firms with high scores were W&S, Grand Central and Merseyrail, two operating a handful of trains a day, and another on a closed network. Is there a pattern emerging here?

I'm sure that if FGW cut back its network to London-Reading only, it too would achieve great marks but the bigger and more complex your operation,the more things there are to go wrong and more people using your trains to upset when that happens. Not sure there's any way round this, because if you tried to 'weight' the result it might obscure failings or distort what is supposed to be a way of getting an objective snapshot of how passengers see things around the country.



Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Super Guard on February 06, 2010, 01:01:06
Not this passenger (not a bloody customer, particularly so in this instance).....

Want a coffee between Bristol Parkway and Taunton? No chance with XC. Travelling down last Saturday I noted that their was a crew change at Temple Meads and the off-duty 'Retail Services Manager' stayed on board along with the new RSM.

Stuff like this really p*sses oops, can't put that, um, gets on my nerves and gives the rest of us a bad name. Assuming it wasn't one of our elusive HSTs then the trolley handover should have taken place in F at the catering store so stocks can be checked in the fridge there. Even first class complimentaries should come off the trolley at the weekend so the RSM has no business hanging about the galley if they've not served the train. I personally will off drinks to first if I have time or if there's no catering on board, but don't go telling the managers that.

I'm really not a fan of XC, and it's such a shame to see Arriva putting it to the dogs, but I am glad there are still staff 'on the ground' that care enough to go beyond such as 'readytostart'.  :)


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Phil on February 06, 2010, 07:44:35
Phil, I rather think the situation at Chepstow is entirely different, XC pass through there anyway, so stoppi g there isn't a massive effort, whereas melksham requires units and crew which don't exist at present..!

Go tell the Corsham Station campaign that :)


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: willc on February 06, 2010, 09:54:20
Phil, the trains for Corsham don't exist either. FGW has always taken the view that if Corsham and Wantage Road/Grove ever reopen that it would not stop expresses at them. With the loss of the Oxford-Bristol Turbo service, there's nothing else running past either place, so even if the councils ever do manage to get the money to build the stations from somewhere, they would need to find yet more to subsidise some sort of train service.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: IndustryInsider on February 06, 2010, 13:22:27
FGW has always taken the view that if Corsham and Wantage Road/Grove ever reopen that it would not stop expresses at them. With the loss of the Oxford-Bristol Turbo service, there's nothing else running past either place, so even if the councils ever do manage to get the money to build the stations from somewhere, they would need to find yet more to subsidise some sort of train service.

That's where the 'Wiltshire Electric Horseshoe' fits in nicely.  ;)


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: John R on February 06, 2010, 16:34:28
It wouldn't help Corsham though?


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: vacman on February 06, 2010, 22:27:16
Phil, I rather think the situation at Chepstow is entirely different, XC pass through there anyway, so stoppi g there isn't a massive effort, whereas melksham requires units and crew which don't exist at present..!

Go tell the Corsham Station campaign that :)
There's also the small matter of there actually been a station at Chepstow!


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: caliwag on February 12, 2010, 11:12:20
But however... :o

http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/news/headlines/5003869.First_Great_Western_voted_train_operator_of_the_year/?ref=rss


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: amiddl on February 12, 2010, 12:56:27
Quote
But however... Shocked

http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/news/headlines/5003869.First_Great_Western_voted_train_operator_of_the_year/?ref=rss

This does amaze me. FGW are not the worse but certainly a surprise as the best.

I have suffered a spate of problems with FGW over the last 6 months which has really put me off. I can rarely fault staff but stock problems, delays and a lack of planning puts FGW well down my list. Lower than XC  probably not - but not that far above and certainly not train operator of the year..


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: grahame on February 12, 2010, 14:35:40
Quote
But however... Shocked

http://www.thisiswiltshire.co.uk/news/headlines/5003869.First_Great_Western_voted_train_operator_of_the_year/?ref=rss

This does amaze me. FGW are not the worse but certainly a surprise as the best.

I have suffered a spate of problems with FGW over the last 6 months which has really put me off. I can rarely fault staff but stock problems, delays and a lack of planning puts FGW well down my list. Lower than XC  probably not - but not that far above and certainly not train operator of the year..

I'm tring to work out how this was judged / how the winner was decided, while at the same time agreeing that FGW probably do deserve a "most improved" award because they've stepped up so far from the "last by a long way" position they found themselves in three years ago.   I found the following:

http://railwayeye.blogspot.com/2010/02/eversholt-rail-awards-funniest-ever.html

http://www.railbusinessawards.com/sponsorship.html

Eversholt Rail, the main sponsors, are a RoSCo (part of HSBC), so it's likely that "best" isn't being judged from a passenger's viewpoint, but rather by how well they're liked by others in the industry, in particular those people who get all the money for hiring them older rolling stock than anyone else's fleet at prices which are very profitable to the stock owners.


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: old original on February 12, 2010, 15:16:27
perhaps we are all forgetting that... "you can prove anything you want to with statistics"


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: TrainSpy on February 26, 2010, 00:41:24
Actually if you have a look at the interview with Mark Hopwood on the awards website, its pretty clear that FGW got the award for the improvements they've made in the last two years - which lets be fair are fairly significant - rather than that they're the 'best'. if you get the distinction! I like the fact he says he's proud of everyone at FGW... makes a change i suppose!


Title: Re: XC beats FGW.... so say the Customers
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on February 26, 2010, 14:55:10
Welcome to the Coffee Shop forum, TrainSpy!  :)



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net