Title: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 06, 2009, 23:04:48 3 Random Pictures, 2 of which taken by me, one of them is a Google Maps Image of a railway station from above. Guess where they are :) (These are all pretty easy to be honest)
1. What station is my car parked at? (http://www.iworkforfgw.com/images/n566580458_5644118_7045.jpg) 2. What station is this an entrance to? *Answered Correctly as Taunton by: inspector_blakey* (http://www.iworkforfgw.com/images/random.JPG) 3. What station are we looking at from above? (http://www.iworkforfgw.com/images/fromabove1.JPG) Sorry if pics are a bit big. Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Mookiemoo on October 06, 2009, 23:07:36 2 - Maidenhead? Back entrance I went in through today not the side where the taxi rank is? Maybe
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: inspector_blakey on October 06, 2009, 23:08:05 I reckon 2 might be Taunton...
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 06, 2009, 23:13:46 2 is indeed Taunton
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 06, 2009, 23:45:41 ... don't go there ... :-[ :P :-X
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 06, 2009, 23:46:46 ... don't go there ... :-[ :P :-X Took that picture after you all got on your train Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: grahame on October 07, 2009, 19:09:17 Wild guess ... is picture no. 1 Paddington?
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 07, 2009, 20:28:32 Hmm ... that rather distinctive red/brown brickwork makes me think Thames Valley: 1. Reading? :-\
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: johoare on October 07, 2009, 21:04:26 I agree with Grahame. I thought Picture 1. was maybe Paddington...
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 07, 2009, 21:14:05 Well, yes, I can see that those white buildings in the background could be Paddington - and Ollie had clearly polished his car, so it wouldn't look out of place in space number 2 there! ;)
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: grahame on October 07, 2009, 22:27:15 - and Ollie had clearly polished his car, so it wouldn't look out of place in space number 2 there! ;) Don't be so sure. The question asked "What station is my car parked at" and shows a picture of a car at a station; there is nothing to confirm that the car in the picture is Ollie's car, or indeed that the picture is taken at the station that Ollie's car is parked at - we have just made that assumption. The answer could be "Ollie's car is parked at Melksham station, as he caught the 06:40 to Paddington, where he later took this picture of someone else's car. His car is STILL at Melksham station because he missed today's 17:45 back, and now has to wait for tomorrow's 17:45 as it is the ONLY train each day with a connection to Melksham, and he wouldn't risk being seen on a b-u-s". Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 07, 2009, 22:35:35 The answer could be "Ollie's car is parked at Melksham station, as he caught the 06:40 to Paddington, where he later took this picture of someone else's car. His car is STILL at Melksham station because he missed today's 17:45 back, and now has to wait for tomorrow's 17:45 as it is the ONLY train each day with a connection to Melksham, and he wouldn't risk being seen on a b-u-s". Yes, that's also possible -although Ollie did risk being seen on a Voyager, last Saturday, remember! ;) :D ;D Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Mookiemoo on October 07, 2009, 23:53:42 The white building cant be reading - the only white building near the station is the malmaison (my home away from home) and it has not parking near it!
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 07, 2009, 23:58:05 Thanks, FallenAngel, for that local knowledge! ;)
I'll go with 1. Paddington, then! ;D Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 08, 2009, 00:52:29 I can confirm that Picture 1 is Paddington Station in Car Park 2 :)
Just 3 to get then. Clue being it's a station served by Turbos Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Mookiemoo on October 08, 2009, 00:58:42 I can confirm that Picture 1 is Paddington Station in Car Park 2 :) Just 3 to get then. Clue being it's a station served by Turbos Which means its on: PAD - OXF PAD-RDG RDG-Basingstoke RDG-Newbury (?) Maidenhead-Marlow Slough-Windsor Twyford-Henley I personally can rule out Slough-Windsor PAD-RDG It looks vaguely like it COULD be between reading and oxford - possibly somewhere I normally speed through BUT it could also be one of the cotswolds halts which I dont fully recognize yet (and hope never to!) Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: inspector_blakey on October 08, 2009, 01:38:57 Well, it's only double track which rules out anywhere between PAD/DID, and it's definitely not Appleford, Culham or Radley either. So I think we can eliminate PAD-OXF. It's definitely not Heyford or KIngs Sutton, don't think it's Tackley...
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 08, 2009, 02:06:34 I can confirm that Picture 1 is Paddington Station in Car Park 2 :) Just 3 to get then. Clue being it's a station served by Turbos Which means its on: PAD - OXF PAD-RDG RDG-Basingstoke RDG-Newbury (?) Maidenhead-Marlow Slough-Windsor Twyford-Henley I personally can rule out Slough-Windsor PAD-RDG It looks vaguely like it COULD be between reading and oxford - possibly somewhere I normally speed through BUT it could also be one of the cotswolds halts which I dont fully recognize yet (and hope never to!) Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: inspector_blakey on October 08, 2009, 02:56:29 Thinking laterally, might those Turbos be operated by The Sainted Chiltern...?
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 08, 2009, 03:21:48 Thinking laterally, might those Turbos be operated by The Sainted Chiltern...? Nope, FGW :)Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: grahame on October 08, 2009, 05:08:56 Possibly North Downs line, and with the picture showing North at the top, It'll be between Guildford and Wokingham (exclusive)
Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: JayMac on October 08, 2009, 09:59:59 Thanks for that tip Grahame. Made trawling Google Earth easier (is that cheating?)
No 3 is indeed on the North Downs Line and is Crowthorne. Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 08, 2009, 14:30:19 Thanks for that tip Grahame. Made trawling Google Earth easier (is that cheating?) No 3 is indeed on the North Downs Line and is Crowthorne. It is cheating, but yeah, obviously due to that cheating you are right. Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Mookiemoo on October 08, 2009, 15:55:42 Thanks for that tip Grahame. Made trawling Google Earth easier (is that cheating?) No 3 is indeed on the North Downs Line and is Crowthorne. :-( And that is the station I use twice a day every day and will do for the next year :-( But then i've only been on it a week! Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 08, 2009, 16:07:12 Thanks for that tip Grahame. Made trawling Google Earth easier (is that cheating?) No 3 is indeed on the North Downs Line and is Crowthorne. :-( And that is the station I use twice a day every day and will do for the next year :-( But then i've only been on it a week! Random Fact: Crowthorne is the station that is closest to my home. Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Mookiemoo on October 08, 2009, 18:41:10 Thanks for that tip Grahame. Made trawling Google Earth easier (is that cheating?) No 3 is indeed on the North Downs Line and is Crowthorne. :-( And that is the station I use twice a day every day and will do for the next year :-( But then i've only been on it a week! Random Fact: Crowthorne is the station that is closest to my home. And its the closest station to my client and not even that close at that! (J&J pinewood campus) Arse end of no where. But hey ho, helps the diet, no shops near by and an some bizarre desk rules means you dont feel like eating at all during the day Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: JayMac on October 08, 2009, 23:06:56 My apologies if my 'cheating' caused offence :o Prior to Grahame's tip I had looked at stations on Google Earth all over the areas served by Turbos. Unfortunately I had neglected the North Downs Line (as had FallenAngel in her summary of possible lines!)
I could've just posted 'Crowthorne' with no explanation as to how I got the answer. However, I now subscribe to the tenet that 'honesty is the best policy'. A magistrate once commended me on my admirable honesty when I was in the dock. Didn't stop her sending me down for six weeks!!! :( Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 08, 2009, 23:08:23 My apologies if my 'cheating' caused offence :o Prior to Grahame's tip I had looked at stations on Google Earth all over the areas served by Turbos. Unfortunately I had neglected the North Downs Line (as had FallenAngel in her summary of possible lines!) I could've just posted 'Crowthorne' with no explanation as to how I got the answer. However, I now subscribe to the tenet that 'honesty is the best policy'. A magistrate once commended me on my admirable honesty when I was in the dock. Didn't stop her sending me down for six weeks!!! :( Aha no it's fine, in fairness with one like that I would expect people to have looked, part of the reason I mentioned I grabbed it from Google Maps. Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Mookiemoo on October 08, 2009, 23:41:04 My apologies if my 'cheating' caused offence :o Prior to Grahame's tip I had looked at stations on Google Earth all over the areas served by Turbos. Unfortunately I had neglected the North Downs Line (as had FallenAngel in her summary of possible lines!) Which is WHAT embarasses FallenAngel so much! I can accept not getting the Crowthorne - I dash in and our of there once a day (sometimes twice) so I ca accept not getting the station! BUT To forget the line existed at all - that is just not on! Have to admit before now I only ever went to Waterloo or Egham on that line - going to Gatwick would never occur to me by train and I've never worked i Guildford - so I associate THAT part of Reading station with SWT! Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: JayMac on October 09, 2009, 00:07:09 Have to admit before now I only ever went to Waterloo or Egham on that line - going to Gatwick would never occur to me by train and I've never worked i Guildford - so I associate THAT part of Reading station with SWT! You're not alone! I also only associate THAT part of Reading station with SWT. As my only regular journey from platforms 4a and 4b is to Bracknell and occasionally onwards to Waterloo. Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 09, 2009, 00:11:36 My apologies if my 'cheating' caused offence :o Prior to Grahame's tip I had looked at stations on Google Earth all over the areas served by Turbos. Unfortunately I had neglected the North Downs Line (as had FallenAngel in her summary of possible lines!) Which is WHAT embarasses FallenAngel so much! I can accept not getting the Crowthorne - I dash in and our of there once a day (sometimes twice) so I ca accept not getting the station! BUT To forget the line existed at all - that is just not on! Have to admit before now I only ever went to Waterloo or Egham on that line - going to Gatwick would never occur to me by train and I've never worked i Guildford - so I associate THAT part of Reading station with SWT! Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Mookiemoo on October 09, 2009, 00:38:24 My apologies if my 'cheating' caused offence :o Prior to Grahame's tip I had looked at stations on Google Earth all over the areas served by Turbos. Unfortunately I had neglected the North Downs Line (as had FallenAngel in her summary of possible lines!) Which is WHAT embarasses FallenAngel so much! I can accept not getting the Crowthorne - I dash in and our of there once a day (sometimes twice) so I ca accept not getting the station! BUT To forget the line existed at all - that is just not on! Have to admit before now I only ever went to Waterloo or Egham on that line - going to Gatwick would never occur to me by train and I've never worked i Guildford - so I associate THAT part of Reading station with SWT! So why does it have such a piss poor stopping pattern Look at my morning commute in from worcester (yeah I know I'm insane) - its quicker to get off at wokingham than wait for the next train that stops at crowthorne. If its such a big residential area.......... why not more stoppers. And dont tell me driving is quicker - we moved from wokingham to shropshire in 2002 because of the traffic - the taxis I've had in the last week (due to the stourport bridge being closed and clogging up the worcester road meaning I've been late almost every day with no time to get the bike out of the truck) means I've seen the traffic in wokingham, bracknell and the A329/M - its no better than in 2002! Getting to wokingham for a waterloo connection or farnborough for a reading connection (the only one I think gets every train stopping) would e a nightmare in rush hour! Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 09, 2009, 00:45:42 My apologies if my 'cheating' caused offence :o Prior to Grahame's tip I had looked at stations on Google Earth all over the areas served by Turbos. Unfortunately I had neglected the North Downs Line (as had FallenAngel in her summary of possible lines!) Which is WHAT embarasses FallenAngel so much! I can accept not getting the Crowthorne - I dash in and our of there once a day (sometimes twice) so I ca accept not getting the station! BUT To forget the line existed at all - that is just not on! Have to admit before now I only ever went to Waterloo or Egham on that line - going to Gatwick would never occur to me by train and I've never worked i Guildford - so I associate THAT part of Reading station with SWT! So why does it have such a piss poor stopping pattern Look at my morning commute in from worcester (yeah I know I'm insane) - its quicker to get off at wokingham than wait for the next train that stops at crowthorne. If its such a big residential area.......... why not more stoppers. And dont tell me driving is quicker - we moved from wokingham to shropshire in 2002 because of the traffic - the taxis I've had in the last week (due to the stourport bridge being closed and clogging up the worcester road meaning I've been late almost every day with no time to get the bike out of the truck) means I've seen the traffic in wokingham, bracknell and the A329/M - its no better than in 2002! Getting to wokingham for a waterloo connection or farnborough for a reading connection (the only one I think gets every train stopping) would e a nightmare in rush hour! Then the issue is that the car park at Crowthorne is small which makes Wokingham the better option both in terms of parking and frequency of service. Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Mookiemoo on October 09, 2009, 00:57:57 My apologies if my 'cheating' caused offence :o Prior to Grahame's tip I had looked at stations on Google Earth all over the areas served by Turbos. Unfortunately I had neglected the North Downs Line (as had FallenAngel in her summary of possible lines!) Which is WHAT embarasses FallenAngel so much! I can accept not getting the Crowthorne - I dash in and our of there once a day (sometimes twice) so I ca accept not getting the station! BUT To forget the line existed at all - that is just not on! Have to admit before now I only ever went to Waterloo or Egham on that line - going to Gatwick would never occur to me by train and I've never worked i Guildford - so I associate THAT part of Reading station with SWT! So why does it have such a piss poor stopping pattern Look at my morning commute in from worcester (yeah I know I'm insane) - its quicker to get off at wokingham than wait for the next train that stops at crowthorne. If its such a big residential area.......... why not more stoppers. And dont tell me driving is quicker - we moved from wokingham to shropshire in 2002 because of the traffic - the taxis I've had in the last week (due to the stourport bridge being closed and clogging up the worcester road meaning I've been late almost every day with no time to get the bike out of the truck) means I've seen the traffic in wokingham, bracknell and the A329/M - its no better than in 2002! Getting to wokingham for a waterloo connection or farnborough for a reading connection (the only one I think gets every train stopping) would e a nightmare in rush hour! Then the issue is that the car park at Crowthorne is small which makes Wokingham the better option both in terms of parking and frequency of service. But wokingham traffic is awful with the level crossing jamming up the roads every five minutes! Thats one of the reasons we decided to leave. Bracknell is equally awful and farborough is a nightmare. Hate to say this BUT - Wokingham is i a town, you cant expand it much unless you put up a multi story - doubt that would go down well but somewhere that side of reading needs a park way! Winnersh triangle? but you'd have to stop the gatwicks - Crowthore being so close to the line split and being not a major destination screams use me! Albeit waterloo users would have to change. The worst thing they did was build the sainsbury at winnersh - that is what screwed up the traffic! I get hives thinking about when I lived there - ok I have to get up in five hours to get a train to work but at the moment I see, sheep cows, and pheasants under a clear half moon night and no noise other than nature! And I dont need much sleep! Title: Re: 3 Random Pictures Post by: Ollie on October 09, 2009, 01:03:17 But wokingham traffic is awful with the level crossing jamming up the roads every five minutes! Thats one of the reasons we decided to leave. Bracknell is equally awful and farborough is a nightmare. Hate to say this BUT - Wokingham is i a town, you cant expand it much unless you put up a multi story - doubt that would go down well but somewhere that side of reading needs a park way! Winnersh triangle? but you'd have to stop the gatwicks - Crowthore being so close to the line split and being not a major destination screams use me! Albeit waterloo users would have to change. The worst thing they did was build the sainsbury at winnersh - that is what screwed up the traffic! I get hives thinking about when I lived there - ok I have to get up in five hours to get a train to work but at the moment I see, sheep cows, and pheasants under a clear half moon night and no noise other than nature! And I dont need much sleep! Yeah Wokingham traffic is bad. As stated my closest station is Crowthorne, but I actually drive to Reading it's much easier for me. Winnersh Triangle is getting a lot of business development at the moment, also a lot of work going on the roads around it. But at the station itself there is some parking, but I don't know whether there is room to expand on it. Also behind Showcase Cinemas is the Park and Ride taking you by bus to Reading. This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |