Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => Bristol (WECA) Commuters => Topic started by: Chris from Nailsea on July 26, 2009, 02:40:50



Title: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on July 26, 2009, 02:40:50
From the BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/bristol/8168601.stm):

Quote
A bendy bus scheme is to be introduced in Bristol within the next two years.

The government is to fund the ^42m project for the city as part of its overall future transport strategy for England.

The route planned for the bus is from the Long Ashton park-and-ride site and along Cumberland Road before heading through the city to Temple Meads.

Bendy buses have been phased out in London, with the capital's mayor calling them "much-loathed vehicles".

Money for the scheme has been set aside as part of the Regional Funding Allocation - a process of prioritising major transport schemes across the whole of the south west region over the next 10 years.


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: dog box on July 26, 2009, 09:41:24
Another hair brained scheme by the sounds of it ....difference and benefits over an ordinary bus ??..well it bends i suppose..could have given it a much more exciting name taking a cue from the much celebrated pewsey station bus...caling it The Bristol Wiggybus


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: RailCornwall on July 26, 2009, 09:55:35
There is, I believe serious, consideration being made that the new Truro East P&R vehicles should be bendy buses too.


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: johoare on July 26, 2009, 10:50:34
Maybe they could buy the bendy buses from Boris?  ;)


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: RailCornwall on July 26, 2009, 11:03:54
Maybe they could buy the bendy buses from Boris?  ;)

(Truro) It has been discussed, how seriously and whether an approach has been made I don't know.


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: JayMac on July 26, 2009, 12:36:26
I care not a jot whether my bus is bendy, double decker, single decker, hopper or whatever. All I want is a bus that is on time, with a reasonable fare, clean and clear of scroats. Don't get much of that in Bristol at the moment!


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: bemmy on July 27, 2009, 14:59:26
Showcase busroute.... guided busway.... bendy bus.... Those consultants, who are so worth the millions we spend on them, need to think of a new name for a bus that doesn't have the word bus in it, because they're still failing to fool us. A bus is a bus is a bus, ask anyone in Bristol who doesn't use buses what sort of public transport they might choose to use, and they all won't say bus.

I don't actually mind buses myself, but then I grew up in a family without a car so I feel at home on the 76 to Hartcliffe. However, I try to use Bristol buses as little as possible, because they are slower than walking, more unreliable than the British summer, and almost as expensive as taxis.... and that will apply regardless of how they are re-branded. Unless these bendy buses have developed the ability to leap over traffic queues.


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on November 15, 2009, 01:01:36
From the Bristol Evening Post (http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/homepage/Bristol-bridge-closed-cars-vans-lorries/article-1512483-detail/article.html):

Quote
Bristol bridge to be closed to cars, vans and lorries

A bridge used by commuters and visitors to Bristol's harbourside is set to be closed to cars, vans and lorries.

Within four years the Prince Street Bridge, which spans the docks near the Arnolfini arts centre, will have one lane used by the proposed bendy buses from Long Ashton park and ride into the city centre, while the other will be restricted to pedestrians and cyclists.

One lane was closed earlier this year, which led to an outcry and fears of traffic jams in nearby streets, particularly at peak times.

It will also mean motorists will have a lengthy detour to reach Prince Street or car parking in The Grove or Queen Square.

But Bristol's transport leader Jon Rogers said the volume of traffic using the Grade II-listed bridge was "not high" and he does not believe that full closure will lead to traffic chaos. He said: "The levels of traffic using the bridge are not high and predictions of traffic chaos following a trial reduction in traffic did not turn out to be at all accurate. The chaos was in fact non-existent and I don't expect to hear that word connected with this bridge any more. Motorists are keen that we provide the kind of high-quality public transport that will tempt them out of their cars and well, this is it. It's time to bite the bullet. We're opening the bridge to a high-quality fast and efficient mode of public transport never seen before in Bristol. I am confident that many people who currently drive over the bridge will use it."

The bridge closure will be part of a Transport and Works Act Order to be submitted by Bristol and North Somerset councils early in the new year. The order will provide the legal consent to build the ^48 million first rapid transit route in Bristol, which is hoped to be up and running by 2013.

Transport experts looked at various ways to route the bendy buses over the docks, including building a new bridge. They also considered widening and strengthening Prince Street Bridge.

The council spent ^40,000 on alterations to the bridge to make it a one-lane system in January, with traffic lights controlling cars and cyclists.

The rapid transit is intended to provide an affordable, fast and reliable solution to Bristol's congestion.

Stops on the route would include Ashton Gate, the proposed site for Bristol City's stadium near Ashton Vale, Spike Island, the soon-to-be renovated Museum of Bristol, Cabot Circus, Broadmead and the Arnolfini.


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: matt473 on November 15, 2009, 13:18:07
Does First have anything to do with this as if they do could Bristol be soonto sample the ftr they run in other cities?


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: Cruithne3753 on November 15, 2009, 17:04:26
Of course instead of these stupid wendy buses they could always rebuild Ashton Gate railway station which would give a link to Temple meads, then a cheap "BRT-lite" using conventional buses could then run from TM up Victoria Street to central Bristol... but of course then they would miss out on the gratuitious fun of bulldozing through peoples gardens, green spaces etc. whilst squandering huge amounts of money in the process.

And as for FTR... it looks like a giant purple people-eating maggot.  I WANT MY FUTURE BACK!

I'm almost tempted to buy a car in protest.


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: Brucey on November 15, 2009, 17:27:17
Does a bendy bus have any advantages over a double decker?  Surely a bog standard double decker carries more passengers than a bendy bus anyway?

With regards to bemmy's comment about walking being faster than buses, this always seems true in Bristol.  I live in the Cotham/Redland area and find it is quicker to walk from Temple Meads than get the bus.  By the time I've waited for it to arrive, then load the passengers and make its way around the Station Approach, I'm already at the Waterfront area.  By the time the bus arrives at the Waterfront, I can be home, saving ^1.60 in the process.

Of course, I much prefer to jump on the Severn Beach Line service and hop off at Redland (for a bargain 75p with railcard or ~35p on an advance ticket) but the connection never fits for services from Portsmouth on the days I tend to travel. :(

I'm surprised these consultants haven't suggested an underground system for Bristol?  But then that is "so last century".  Why have a tube train when you can have rapid transport systems.


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: devon_metro on November 15, 2009, 18:43:25
Bendy Buses carry far more people as far as I know!


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: rogerw on November 15, 2009, 22:34:43
Bendy Buses carry far more people as far as I know!

But have less seats!


Title: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 18, 2010, 18:44:09
From the DfT press release (http://nds.coi.gov.uk/clientmicrosite/Content/Detail.aspx?ClientId=202&NewsAreaId=2&ReleaseID=412269&SubjectId=36):

Quote
Bristol is one step closer to benefitting from ^48m worth of improvements to its public transport system, Transport Minister Paul Clark announced today whilst visiting the city.

The plans, which have received initial Government approval, involve creating a new express bus service ^ called a Rapid Transit Route ^ from Long Ashton Park and Ride to Bristol Temple Meads and on to Cabot Circus, Broadmead and the Centre.  A significant part of the route would be on dedicated roads and bus lanes.

There are also plans to increase bus services on the Ashton Vale to Temple Meads route.

The aim of the scheme is to ease congestion and reduce journey times for commuters and it is part of a series of bus improvements planned in the West Country.

Transport Minister Paul Clark said:

^An efficient and reliable transport system is the lifeblood of every local community. This is why we^re investing significant amounts of money in Bristol's infrastructure. Today's announcement seeks to tackle congestion in the city, whilst presenting real alternatives to the car. The West of England is a prosperous area with a good standard of living and its reputation is growing internationally. So it is only right that it has a world class transport system to match."

Also included in proposals are:
^ parallel cycling lanes and routes for pedestrians between the Museum of Bristol and Long Ashton Park and Ride
^ additional bus services to provide faster journey times and improved reliability for services to Weston-super-Mare, Clevedon and Nailsea
^ ticket machines at bus stops and user-friendly electronic information displays

Today's decision means that Bristol City Council can move forward with detailed planning for the scheme.


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: The Grecian on March 18, 2010, 18:55:53
Doesn't say anything about the Portishead branch then. You might have thought that a railway line in situ to the town might be useful given that the A369 can resemble a car park at peak times, but clearly ^48m could be better spent elsewhere.  ::)

Having said that I'm not sure how much railway improvements ^48m would buy these days...


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: John R on March 18, 2010, 19:06:59
So is that curtains for the line alongside New Cut to the Create Centre then?


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: paul7575 on March 18, 2010, 19:11:35
The notes to teh announcement explain:

Today^s announcement grants the Ashton Vale to Temple Meads and Bristol City Centre Bus Rapid Transit major scheme ^Programme Entry^ status in line with the Department for Transport^s local major scheme guidance approval process, meaning the Department expects to fund the scheme subject to availability of funds, costs remaining the same, and the relevant planning permission being obtained.

So no money has changed hands. These and other recent DfT announcements are very much initial approvals - wonder why they are so common all of a sudden... ::)

Paul


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: John R on March 18, 2010, 19:15:23
Can't possibly imagine.  ;)


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: Adrian the Rock on March 18, 2010, 21:50:09
What gets me about Bristol is that, if they put their minds to it, they could probably have a jolly decent tram network given the various ex-rail trackbeds and other lightly-used lines in the area.

First, Lawrence Hill (High Level!) to Mangotsfield, or maybe even as far as Yate.  Second, the Severn Beach branch looks to me like the sort of line that should have been chosen in the first place for those tram-train experiments they originally had the mad idea of trying on Sheffield - Huddersfield.  It seems to me the Severn Beach line has always struggled as a heavy rail line - a service at most half hourly is not going to be very attractive within a conurbation - but if the passenger services were converted to trams (with the route remaining its capability for freight and other diversions) - a more frequent service could be provided, perhaps with additional stations, and that'd probably make a huge difference.

In the other direction, do the same with the Portishead line and include Parson St and Bedminster in the tram services.  Same calculus applies - the line is probably too short to be a really viable heavy rail passenger route, but trams would probably be a huge hit like NET is in Nottingham.

Okay, I don't have a grand plan for the central section, but I'd have thought something could be worked out - if not on-street running then at least sharing NR tracks between Lawrence Hill and Parson St.

Otheer possibilities would include running up to Filton Abbey Wood and Parkway (with the main lines between Dr Days Bridge Jvt and Filtoon reinstated and used as the NR lines, or even re-opening Severn Beach to Patchway and possibly beyond.


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: John R on March 18, 2010, 22:15:54
Go back 30 years and there was indeed such a plan. "Avon Metro" appeared in a 1980 Modern Railways and was heavily promoted by Richard Cotterell. Sadly nothing ever happened, for reasons that will be known to many, and are far too long to go into here.


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: Cruithne3753 on March 18, 2010, 22:48:49
If Brunel was alive today, I wonder what he would do?


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on March 18, 2010, 23:01:10
He would probably be shaking his head over such a lost opportunity.  ::)

See http://www.tramdev.clara.net/hist.htm for some background on the Avon Metro.  :(


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: Timmer on March 19, 2010, 06:02:29
If Brunel was alive today, I wonder what he would do?
Not spend the money on yet more buses! They just don't get it do they, people won't get out of their cars to get on a bus but many would to get on a tram. Just looking at the success of tram networks around the country. Shame it will probably never happen in this part of the world.


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: Brucey on March 19, 2010, 07:54:28
Not spend the money on yet more buses! They just don't get it do they, people won't get out of their cars to get on a bus but many would to get on a tram. Just looking at the success of tram networks around the country. Shame it will probably never happen in this part of the world.
Having spent my life living in Portsmouth before moving to Bristol, we've had out fair share of elaborate tram system proposals.  All that happens is they end up building more bus lanes and buying new buses, which are just as underused as the previous ones.  ::)

Bristol certainly needs a public transport link (not buses) to the city centre.  The lack of this connection could be one of the factors which causes the congestion around this area.  An underground system would probably be needed, otherwise the trams would cause even more chaos on the roads.


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: TheLastMinute on March 19, 2010, 12:30:21
Oh, if only we still lived in Avon...


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: dog box on March 19, 2010, 18:26:03
Severn Beach Line struggling?????.....well if you think full and standing at peak times equals struggling


Title: Re: 'Bendy bus scheme planned for city' in Bristol, from the BBC (25/07/09)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 08, 2010, 20:54:30
From the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-11499496):

Quote
Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses

A planned ^42m bendy bus scheme for Bristol could be replaced by a cheaper tram scheme.

The bus plan was originally announced in 2009 and would have linked Long Ashton park-and-ride with Temple Meads.

Bristol City Council has met with tram consultants Sustraco who claim switching to trams could save the authority money.

The council will now meet with a government minister to discuss whether either scheme is viable.

Councillor Gary Hopkins, the council's transport spokesman, said the authority was aware that funding was a big issue. "We are aware the government are reviewing the costings on these schemes and the different viabilities," he said. "As some of the money will come from government then we have to be sensitive to their views. If government decides we'd much rather support a different type of technology then what we're saying to them is we're happy with what we've bid for but if you feel there's a different way forward we'll listen."

Bristol had planned a city-wide ^200m tram scheme nine years ago but it was scrapped in 2004 because of escalating costs.


Title: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses
Post by: standclearplease on October 09, 2010, 12:06:11
I'll believe it when I see it!  ;)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-11499496



Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses
Post by: anthony215 on October 09, 2010, 14:21:04
If Trams are cheaper than the FTR bendy bus then maybe someone at Swansea council should look at a tramlink betwen Swansea & Mumbles.

Wasnt the problems with the Bristol tram scheme that the  local aunthorities couldnt agree on the proposals or somthing?


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on October 09, 2010, 18:52:33
I've merged a few topics here - as usual, in the interests of continuity and clarity ...  ::) :-[ ;D


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: standclearplease on October 10, 2010, 10:30:25
So are these proper rail based trams, or trams that can run on the road and rails?


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: JayMac on October 12, 2010, 01:20:50
Eh?


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: anthony215 on October 13, 2010, 02:43:27
So are these proper rail based trams, or trams that can run on the road and rails?

Do you mean something like the parry people movers?. If I am correct these vehicles are lighter than normal trams meaning that the railways can just be put down along the road and dont require stuff like telephone cable to be diverted


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: standclearplease on October 13, 2010, 16:26:57
Ah, I see. Perhaps I'm barking up the wrong tree. I remember them on the harbour side in Bristol.

They aren't pretty!


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: anthony215 on May 04, 2011, 14:52:28
Just found this on the Bristol Evening post's website:

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/news/NEW-TRAM-VISION-FUTURE/article-3517420-detail/article.html


Good idea in theory, i would like it to come off but i have my doubts. As for the trams themselves, the only company i can think of are parry people mover, although is there that company called trampower?


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: eightf48544 on May 05, 2011, 08:27:53
Maybe the Coffee Shop should club together to send Bristol Council to Karlsruhe, Kassel and Nordhausen to see proper tram/trains in operation.

Trams through the town centre at 600 DV and running out on DB/HSB lines sharing with other trains. Karlsruhe trams are dual voltage, Kassel has both dual voltage and EDs whilst Norhausen is ED and metre gauge.
   
Karlsruhr trams cross the main lines on the level at Heilbronn, I've also had a steam run up a Karlsruhe tram line.

Trams in Kassel operate through Wilhelmshohe (equivalent to Temple Meads) which is the through station on the North South High Speed line with ICE/DMUs and freight traffic.

Nordhausen ED trams share the line with 1897 Mallets, 1956 2-10-2Ts on 8 coach passenger trains, DMUs and 500 t freight trains of standard gauge bogie hopper wagons on rollboks.

Therefore, there are NO TECHNICAL or SAFETY Reasons  why properly built tram/trains cannot share heavy rail lines with different traffic mixes and also run  on the street through the town centre.

So Bristol Portishead 25KV to Temple Meads with a loop through docks to town center 600 DC. Temple Meads to Severn Beach, Parkway (via bank and Avonmouth) Yate and Thyerington 25Kv.

Town centre loop to join somewhere on the bank and possibly take over the old Midland line to Yate.

 



Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: paul7575 on May 05, 2011, 17:25:30
Sunderland to Pelaw on the Tyne Wear Metro sees lightweight units of similar build quality to trams operating together with heavy rail passenger and freight.

There's no need for the expense of a trip to Germany IMHO, the fact that the Metro has no street running is surely irrelevant to the main question which is about safety on the shared tracks...

Unless people have an issue with a class 66 being let loose down the local high street accidentally...  ;D

Paul


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: anthony215 on May 05, 2011, 18:12:15
Would be interesting to see a class 66  running along a tramline through Bristol


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on May 05, 2011, 21:47:30
A video news report, from the BBC (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-13292342):

Quote
Trams plan unveiled for Bristol harbour

Plans have been unveiled for a pioneering tram system in Bristol which its backers have said will help cut congestion on the city's roads.

It would use ultra-light trams which campaigners say are cheaper and cleaner than buses.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: eightf48544 on May 06, 2011, 08:42:10
Would be interesting to see a class 66  running along a tramline through Bristol

You get standard gauge Stadler units running down dual gauge (3 rails metre standard) tram lines in Zwicau.

I understand they have special wheel profiles to cope with the different rails.


Title: Bristol bendybus service
Post by: anthony215 on September 06, 2011, 10:59:16
Just seen this in the evening post:

http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/home

seems these are ex london. I wonder how long before 1 decides to go up in flames in Bristol. Then again i hope they dont and maybe no CT plus will give first some competition in Bristol


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on May 26, 2012, 22:17:49
From the Bristol Post (http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Plans-place-bendy-bus-stop-outside-station/story-16170765-detail/story.html):

Quote
Plans in place for bendy bus stop outside station

Fears Bristol's proposed ^50 million bendy bus route will fail to adequately serve passengers at Temple Meads railway station have been eased.

A public inquiry into the much-criticised project yesterday heard plans were being drawn up to ensure buses travelling on the route between the city centre and Ashton Vale would stop directly outside the station.

One of transport campaigners' main objections to the guided bus route, known as a Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system, was its lack of a dedicated bus stop serving the station. They complained that the proposed stop for Temple Meads was located 400m away and across the Temple Way dual carriageway at Temple Circus roundabout.

But at the public inquiry, which will decide the fate of the Government-backed project, it was announced plans are in place to move the stop to outside the Old Passenger Shed in Friary, Temple Quay.

Under the plans, buses would travel along Friary and back again to reach the passenger shed, which could house the station's new entrance when it is turned into a terminus for services using the planned high-speed electric train service to and from London.

Speaking at the inquiry at Armada House in Bristol city centre, the city council's service manager for major projects Bob Fowler said another option would be for buses to go along Friary, past the Wetherspoons pub in Temple Quay, along Temple Back East and back onto Temple Way.

But Mr Fowler told the hearing that the plans to locate the stop in Temple Circus may have to go ahead regardless, because the other proposals to have a closer stop had not been agreed. He said they were part of negotiations over the creation of a new transport hub on a piece of land next to Temple Meads called Plot 6.

Mr Fowler said the plans for a bus stop in Friary "were still the ambition of the project". He admitted that the Temple Circus stop would involve passengers having to cross at two crossings to reach Temple Meads.

On Tuesday, objector Sue Flint, of Transport for Greater Bristol Alliance, told the inquiry the BRT route was "not a good example of connectivity" because it failed to serve the city's main railway station. She said: "The bus stop isn't near Temple Meads. It will require passengers to walk over a number of road junctions to reach the station and the Enterprise Zone."

At yesterday's hearing, Mr Fowler said the city could take confidence from the success of a BRT route recently set up in Cambridge. But he conceded that creating the guided busway in Bristol would lead to the loss of many on-street car parking spaces in Cumberland Road.

The inquiry, which is being heard because objections were made against the plans, started on Tuesday and is set to last six weeks. The route involves buses travelling on the road as well as on sections of guided concrete track from 2015. It is not clear whether bendy buses, double deckers, or other vehicles will be used.


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: TonyK on July 16, 2012, 22:12:49
If Brunel was alive today, I wonder what he would do?

He would be turning in his grave!

To bring this up to date:
BCC seem so wedded to the Bus Rabid Transit idea, that they will rubbish anything else. The other partners in West of English Partnership don't much care what happens in Bristol.
We have already got Boris's buses, running the park and ride routes. They hold a lot more passengers than a double decker, and empty / fill more quickly.
WEP spent ^1m on the Public Inquiry into the BRT route from Ashton Gate to Temple Meads. The opposition group spent ^12,000 and managed to rubbish the business case.
The housing development that the BRT would serve by Long Ashton is not going ahead.
Portishead railway is now a very strong likelihood. This will cut the number of people using the LA park and ride considerably.
"Taking confidence from the success of Cambridge" is a bit rich. That opened 3 years late at almost thrice the price. The council there have earmarked millions to fund the legal battle against the contractors that seems inevitable.
I haven't heard anyone say that ripping up a rail route for this glorified bus lane is a good idea. So much has been spent on bus projects in Bristol, with very little modal change, that we could have spent on real transport. The Severn Beach line shows what can be done to railways with just a little imagination.[/rant over]


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: bobm on July 16, 2012, 22:16:18
I think he would be frustrated by all the "hoops" new schemes have to jump through before seeing the light of day.


Title: Bristol Bendy bus scrapped
Post by: chuffed on October 29, 2012, 15:24:06
Bristol 'bendy bus' plan scrapped from BBC BRistol website

Plans to run bendy buses on the proposed "rapid transit" routes through Bristol have been scrapped.

The Liberal Democrat-run authority said it will now look at using longer single decker buses with multiple doors to allow passengers quick entry and exit.

Deputy leader Jon Rogers said it was part of a package of "radical changes" being proposed for the bus project.

"These buses will cost less and allow us to put more of them on and increase frequencies on our routes," he said.

He added the authority also planned to bring the new buses directly into Bristol Temple Meads railway station instead of them stopping on the nearby roundabout.


Title: Re: Bristol Bendy bus scrapped
Post by: trainer on October 29, 2012, 15:40:42
May I suggest a better alternative?  A flexible electric vehicle capable of negotiating sharp curves has proved popular in many cities and had aided a rapid increase in the use of public transport.  It is true that it requires two parallel rails sunk into the road and the provision of a power supply, but this has proved cost effective in most places. 

Excuse me...for a moment I got carried away.  ::)


Title: Re: Bristol Bendy bus scrapped
Post by: grahame on October 29, 2012, 16:53:55
It is true that it requires two parallel rails sunk into the road and the provision of a power supply ...

You may be able to provide a built in power supply.   I was impressed by the frequency achieved here ... just count the number of seats (and real seats, not just standing room) in a short period.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_lqp3yZv-E


Title: Re: Bristol To Receive ^48m Transport Boost
Post by: TonyK on October 29, 2012, 20:41:15
If Brunel was alive today, I wonder what he would do?

He would be turning in his grave! ::)

I've only found this thread today, hence my disinterment of that post, but it seems appropriate in the circumstances. This rubbish scheme is being watered down every day. We started with "modern low emission vehicles" "high quality experience" "rapid" running on "segregated routes". Now we're down to bog standard diesel buses running in bus lanes, then through the streets of Knowle West, due to become 20mph soon. Complete pigs ear of a job!

One of the arguments against light rail is the cost of moving services from under where the rails are to go. That doesn't wash for the line past Spike Island. The track was laid in 1906. If there are services under it, they haven't needed looking at for 106 years. If they rip that up for buses, they won't be thanked. The route was originally going to serve the new 10,000 home development at Yanley, now scrapped, and the Long Ashton P&R, due to become much quieter the day Portishead reopens. It was also envisaged as transporting football fans to Bristol City's new stadium. Not only have Bristol City Council cocked that up, but the police have advised against it.

I think the cracks will widen quickly now. My spies (via twitter) at the Hustings going on as we speak reveal  at least 3 mayoral candidates dead set against Bust Rabid Transit, 4 are for massive changes. Only Jon Rogers is sticking by it, and even he doesn't like the Prince Street bridge part of the route.

Trams, please! Well worked, fully understood technology, proven to get people out of their cars. More expensive than buses, but much better value long term.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: TonyK on November 12, 2012, 18:32:09
This story from Bristol Evening Post (http://www.thisisbristol.co.uk/Transport-minister-m-looking-forward-working/story-17300975-detail/story.html) deserves to be in several threads for different reasons.

Quote
Transport minister: "I'm looking forward to working with Bristol mayor"

Transport minister Patrick McLoughlin was in Bristol today for David Cameron's Cabinet meeting - and afterwards met bosses from First Great Western and Network Rail at Temple Meads station.

The minister said that he is looking forward to working with the city^s first elected mayor.
 
He went on to say that the problems surrounding the tendering process for the Great Western franchise should be ironed out by the end of the year.

Mr McLoughlin said: ^This is a fantastic facility and a fantastic station and there has been a big increase in demand for rail travel in recent years. It is fantastic that such a great city as Bristol is going to get a great city to match its aspirations.^

The minister said he saw the new mayor as a vital role for the city in terms of transport and business.

He said: ^It will be a great help for me to be able to speak to one individual voice in the city. The elected may will be one clear single voice that we will be able to speak to directly.

^The mayor will be a major voice for Bristol. When I want to speak to someone about transport I can go directly to Boris and hopefully it will work the same way in Bristol.^

The city has been awarded ^130 million to help pay for a new Rapid Transit System but some of the of the candidates have voiced objections to the scheme.

However, Mr McLoughlin is said he is willing to talk directly to the new mayor on a number of issues. He did not rule out moving the cash to another scheme but added that he was keen to work with the new mayor as soon as the election has been settled.

The row over the West Coast Mainline franchise has left a cloud of uncertainty hanging over the bidding to run train services between London and Bristol.

The bidding process has been put on hold after the Government was forced to admit it had made serious mistakes in the process.

Mr McLoughlin said: ^We are holding a number of inquiries which are due to report by the end of the month. The hope is that once we have the findings then we will be able to continue in the bidding process.

^At the same time we want to make sure that Bristol and the south West will continue to get the train service it deserves.^

Of interest in this thread is that the minister did not rule out using the BRT money on a different scheme. This rather pulls the rug from under BRT's few supporters. Their main - only, even - argument against making changes to this shocking scheme is that the funding is for BRT and only BRT.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: swrural on November 13, 2012, 18:33:25
'Mr McLoughlin said: ^This is a fantastic facility and a fantastic station and there has been a big increase in demand for rail travel in recent years. It is fantastic that such a great city as Bristol is going to get a great city to match its aspirations.^'

I take it, FTN, you did not notice this, as reported, ridiculous mangling of the English language.

Apart from that, I do not see how you could read into it that BRT was up for change. 

The photo op was about improving rail facilities in the area, to which BRT is ancillary and complementary.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on November 13, 2012, 20:28:07
'Mr McLoughlin said: ^This is a fantastic facility and a fantastic station and there has been a big increase in demand for rail travel in recent years. It is fantastic that such a great city as Bristol is going to get a great city to match its aspirations.^'

I take it, FTN, you did not notice this, as reported, ridiculous mangling of the English language.

I noticed it - and, to be brutally honest (personal opinion) I merely put it down to sloppy journalism.

Quote
Apart from that, I do not see how you could read into it that BRT was up for change.

Hmm.  From that Bristol Post article:

Quote
The city has been awarded ^130 million to help pay for a new Rapid Transit System but some of the of the candidates have voiced objections to the scheme.

However, Mr McLoughlin is said he is willing to talk directly to the new mayor on a number of issues. He did not rule out moving the cash to another scheme but added that he was keen to work with the new mayor as soon as the election has been settled.

Note also one of the comments added to that Bristol Post article:

Quote
by Brizz_Tony Monday, November 12 2012, 5:42PM
^I think I like Patrick McLoughlin. He has just driven a stake through the heart of the last desperate reason offered by the Lib Dems for not messing with BRT, and the stupid ^50 million BRT2 route. Doubtless Gary Hopkins will disagree, but me and my new mate Pat know what's best for this fantastic city.^

I'm not taking sides, merely pointing out the context.  ;)


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: Bristolboy on November 13, 2012, 23:05:02
Will be interesting to see if rail can be encouraged, or alternatively a tram system and i would agree that it definitely would appear that the minister has suggested that the money could be moved. Whilst I would like to think he knows for certain, it could be the case that he didnt have all the facts when he was asked the question so I don't think we should read too much into it just yet.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: swrural on November 16, 2012, 21:41:47
I agree.  If he had lunched too well, I can see an open mind, but what all of us with an interest in doing *something* should bear in mind is to get *something* off the ground.

The essence to my mind, is an interchange on the side of TM to a local rapid transport that takes people not only around the city but also as quickly up Park St to Whiteladies Rd and Clifton.

That last facility is not the Severn Beach line unless that line is also electrified.  Is it to be? If not, why not?  Why should there be any difference between the Valley lines in South Wales and the Severn Beach line?


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: John R on November 16, 2012, 23:50:04
Because the valley lines have a more intensive service, with four tph or more on much of the network thus making electrification more cost effective than a service which at best is unlikely to be more than 2 tph.

That's the simple answer, but sometimes branches with a less frequent service can merit electrification if the amount of running under the wires is a significant part of the route (as will be the case for the Maesteg line), or if it eliminates the need to maintain a small fleet of different stock.  Neither of these is likely to be the case for the SB line for many years, as there will still be a significant DMU presence in the Bristol area.

Though never say never, and I may be proved wrong, such is the impetus towards electrification at the moment.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: TonyK on November 18, 2012, 23:57:18
'Mr McLoughlin said: ^This is a fantastic facility and a fantastic station and there has been a big increase in demand for rail travel in recent years. It is fantastic that such a great city as Bristol is going to get a great city to match its aspirations.^'

I take it, FTN, you did not notice this, as reported, ridiculous mangling of the English language.

I noticed it - and, to be brutally honest (personal opinion) I merely put it down to sloppy journalism.

And so did I!

Quote

Apart from that, I do not see how you could read into it that BRT was up for change.

Quote
Hmm.  From that Bristol Post article:

Quote
The city has been awarded ^130 million to help pay for a new Rapid Transit System but some of the of the candidates have voiced objections to the scheme.

However, Mr McLoughlin is said he is willing to talk directly to the new mayor on a number of issues. He did not rule out moving the cash to another scheme but added that he was keen to work with the new mayor as soon as the election has been settled.

I know, he didn't rule it in, either. Just being optimistic, as somebody has to.

Quote
Note also one of the comments added to that Bristol Post article:

Quote
by Brizz_Tony Monday, November 12 2012, 5:42PM
^I think I like Patrick McLoughlin. He has just driven a stake through the heart of the last desperate reason offered by the Lib Dems for not messing with BRT, and the stupid ^50 million BRT2 route. Doubtless Gary Hopkins will disagree, but me and my new mate Pat know what's best for this fantastic city.^

I'm not taking sides, merely pointing out the context.  ;)

It's a fair cop.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: TonyK on November 19, 2012, 17:44:41
Because the valley lines have a more intensive service, with four tph or more on much of the network thus making electrification more cost effective than a service which at best is unlikely to be more than 2 tph.

That's the simple answer, but sometimes branches with a less frequent service can merit electrification if the amount of running under the wires is a significant part of the route (as will be the case for the Maesteg line), or if it eliminates the need to maintain a small fleet of different stock.  Neither of these is likely to be the case for the SB line for many years, as there will still be a significant DMU presence in the Bristol area.

Though never say never, and I may be proved wrong, such is the impetus towards electrification at the moment.

The plans for the Greater Bristol Metro, at least as published earlier, would see 2 tph Portishead to Severn Beach, 2 tph Bath to Severn Beach, or a minimum 4 tph from Temple Meads to Severn Beach. That would certainly merit electrification to enable a true Metro style service with EMUs, because of all the advantages that brings over diesel power when running services with short distances between stations.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: swrural on November 19, 2012, 20:18:40
Because the valley lines have a more intensive service, with four tph or more on much of the network thus making electrification more cost effective than a service which at best is unlikely to be more than 2 tph.

That's the simple answer, but sometimes branches with a less frequent service can merit electrification if the amount of running under the wires is a significant part of the route (as will be the case for the Maesteg line), or if it eliminates the need to maintain a small fleet of different stock.  Neither of these is likely to be the case for the SB line for many years, as there will still be a significant DMU presence in the Bristol area.

Though never say never, and I may be proved wrong, such is the impetus towards electrification at the moment.

The plans for the Greater Bristol Metro, at least as published earlier, would see 2 tph Portishead to Severn Beach, 2 tph Bath to Severn Beach, or a minimum 4 tph from Temple Meads to Severn Beach. That would certainly merit electrification to enable a true Metro style service with EMUs, because of all the advantages that brings over diesel power when running services with short distances between stations.

This is the answer to the question i posed on the 'New services' thread, thanks very much.  There was a colour diagram somewhere but this is the same answer in words.

I do think that there is extra work needed before these projected services could achieve their goal (modal shift and environment improvement).

The first is to start developing around the stations proposed for opening and those stations which are still not well placed.  An example of the first would be Ashley Hill (nothing there) and an example of the second is Montpelier which is hidden away, although near the heart (Cheltenham Rd /  Gloucester Road).  In the latter case, one could plonk it next to the viaduct and have lifts (again as example).  Just take a mental trip around the system and it all becomes pretty clear.  As another example, the Henbury loop really does need to dog leg over to the Mall, albeit that i do not understand why people want to go there - soulless.  It would be better if they just converted it into a Bristol Airport terminal building.   :D

The second is to use tram trains.  They really have to get out of the TM island and stretch the track around to the business and shopping areas, as is envisaged for the BRT.

Overcoming the topographical problems of hilly Bristol is a challenge but these ideas are being progressed in Sheffield, for example.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: TonyK on November 21, 2012, 19:52:29
Montpelier is very handy for, well, Montpelier. There are many homes within a few minutes' walk of the station in its present position, particularly when you include the Cromwell Road side of the footbridge. Moving the station towards Chelthenham Road would risk upsetting more people than would be pleased.

Regarding electrification, the government plans to have an electric route from Derby to Avonmouth via Birmingham.  That would see the Henbury loop energised. As the Severn Beach line is occasionally used by freight - I have seen empty coal trains heading down there - it would make sense to do that too. None of this is likely before 2019. The electrification train is not due to be built until next year, yet its every move will be planned by then for the next 6 years. Once the current planned electrification is done, it would make sense to see it continuing its work, until the whole network is done.

I agree about the Henbury dog-leg to the Mall. That should be a condition of any planning consent for Filton Airfield - due to close on 21 December 2012 in one of the worst ideas mooted for the Bristol area. Incidentally, the whole of the equipment there is for sale in an  grandiose eBay style sale. (http://www.go-dove.com/en/event-16773/BAE-Systems-Filton-Airfield-Air-Traffic-Control-Systems/lots?AP=1&Auction_ID&CF&EventID=16773&HideReserveItems&LastSortBy&LF=Filton%2C+Bristol%2C+United+Kingdom&PP=50&UserName&Show=All+Assets+by+Close+Date&SortBy=paddedinventoryid&SortDir=asc&SortAction) If you've ever wanted a radar system, now's your chance.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: anthony215 on November 21, 2012, 20:20:38
Montpelier is very handy for, well, Montpelier. There are many homes within a few minutes' walk of the station in its present position, particularly when you include the Cromwell Road side of the footbridge. Moving the station towards Chelthenham Road would risk upsetting more people than would be pleased.

Regarding electrification, the government plans to have an electric route from Derby to Avonmouth via Birmingham.  That would see the Henbury loop energised. As the Severn Beach line is occasionally used by freight - I have seen empty coal trains heading down there - it would make sense to do that too. None of this is likely before 2019. The electrification train is not due to be built until next year, yet its every move will be planned by then for the next 6 years. Once the current planned electrification is done, it would make sense to see it continuing its work, until the whole network is done.

I agree about the Henbury dog-leg to the Mall. That should be a condition of any planning consent for Filton Airfield - due to close on 21 December 2012 in one of the worst ideas mooted for the Bristol area. Incidentally, the whole of the equipment there is for sale in an  grandiose eBay style sale. (http://www.go-dove.com/en/event-16773/BAE-Systems-Filton-Airfield-Air-Traffic-Control-Systems/lots?AP=1&Auction_ID&CF&EventID=16773&HideReserveItems&LastSortBy&LF=Filton%2C+Bristol%2C+United+Kingdom&PP=50&UserName&Show=All+Assets+by+Close+Date&SortBy=paddedinventoryid&SortDir=asc&SortAction) If you've ever wanted a radar system, now's your chance.


The only mistake you have made 4 track is that the government are supposed to have ordered two facory trains to help deliver the electrification projects.


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: TonyK on November 21, 2012, 21:10:34
anthony215,

I am obliged. I didn't know there was a second train. I am aware of the cement train, which will do the bases for the gantries - not that, is it?


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: paul7575 on November 22, 2012, 12:07:40
anthony215,

I am obliged. I didn't know there was a second train. I am aware of the cement train, which will do the bases for the gantries - not that, is it?

There isn't to be a second train yet, anthony215 is wrong on that.  Every announcement so far about the Windhoff HOOP train has it just being a single train, although different parts of the train can be split off to work separately, eg the piling train (normally putting in steel tubular piles) can run on ahead of the rest.

(Balfour Beatty do have what they call a 'high output' concrete delivery train operating in the NW, but that is not a HOOP in this context.)

Paul


Title: Re: Bristol tram plan may replace bendy buses plan (merged topics)
Post by: TonyK on November 22, 2012, 16:10:06
I've read of the concrete train. I'm keen to see the Windhoff machine in action, but guess I've got a few years to wait. 23 carriages long and ^35 million, I have read, which seems reasonable for a bit of Four Sprung Duck Technique.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net