Title: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: Btline on March 11, 2009, 18:24:16 http://uk.news.yahoo.com/21/20090310/tuk-train-company-concealed-job-cuts-6323e80.html
More job losses. ::) But don't worry, RPIs are being given the opportunity to accept a 50% pay cut and become gateline staff! :'( It makes you sick....... >:( Title: Re: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: devon_metro on March 11, 2009, 18:30:55 Believe Revenue is under threat elsewhere!
Title: Re: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: vacman on March 11, 2009, 20:28:00 Believe Revenue is under threat elsewhere! yes, FGW want to cut revenue managers everywhere (manager grade but still frontline staff) to "save money", more like loose it!Title: Re: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: G.Uard on March 11, 2009, 21:55:38 You could always argue that the subsidy is more attractive than the revenue, which if received in too great a quantity, could have a negative effect on future subsidy deals. However, from a purely front line perspective, we need more, not fewer RPOs, especially as Conductors/TMs are knocking themselves out to increase takings across the network.
Title: Re: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: gaf71 on March 12, 2009, 08:38:18 Believe Revenue is under threat elsewhere! yes, FGW want to cut revenue managers everywhere (manager grade but still frontline staff) to "save money", more like loose it!Title: Re: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: Ollie on March 12, 2009, 10:51:03 Believe Revenue is under threat elsewhere! yes, FGW want to cut revenue managers everywhere (manager grade but still frontline staff) to "save money", more like loose it!Certainly is.. Title: Re: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: Tim on March 12, 2009, 14:18:08 Surely the bean counters can calculate a fairly good estimate for extra fares collected by revenue staff and balance that against the cost of employing teh staff and arrive at sensible staffing levels which maximise revenue. The state of the ecomony or franchise finances doesn't come into that equation.
If they are currently employing too many revenue staff then they have been wasting money up to now. If they are employing too few then they are loosing fares. Title: Re: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: tramway on March 12, 2009, 16:16:53 Putting a few on the exit at Filton more often would probably more than justify the staff costs if the recent post was anything to go by.
I would just love to know how much they raked in that morning. Title: Re: SWT "concealed" job cuts. Post by: Tim on March 12, 2009, 16:32:08 You could always argue that the subsidy is more attractive than the revenue, which if received in too great a quantity, could have a negative effect on future subsidy deals. However, from a purely front line perspective, we need more, not fewer RPOs, especially as Conductors/TMs are knocking themselves out to increase takings across the network. You may well have a point about subsidy vs revenue. It always struck me as odd that things like barriered stations are made franchise conditions when you would think that the TOCs would have enough incentive to do those things anyway This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |