Title: FGW Fleet Status Post by: Sprog on September 12, 2008, 18:41:52 3-car 'hybrid' 158952 has been returned to a 2-car unit as of today, due to its additional '57' car, 57748 (originally part of 158748) having a defective engine & requiring immediate warranty attention at SPM. Its is pressurising & burning it's coolant for some reason, probably due to a fractured cylinder head, cylinder liner or a defective compressor.
Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: devon_metro on September 12, 2008, 18:44:05 Is 956 back out after some tw@t threw a brick at it?
Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: smithy on September 12, 2008, 18:52:22 Is 956 back out after some tw@t threw a brick at it? yes Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: Sprog on September 12, 2008, 22:37:32 Is 956 back out after some tw@t threw a brick at it? 3 people arrested for the attack, in which both the Secondman's side was shattered & the all of the laminates were penetrated in the centre of the Driver's side screen, showering the driver with glass shards. He was hospitalised & the train was taken out of service @ Southampton Central before being taken to SPM to have the windscreens replaced. The windscreens have been retained as Evidence ... Snip - I have removed a sentence here as it could have been seen as predujicing any possible court proceedings, and thus placing this forum in contempt of court - Graham As a result of the incident, FGW are now examining fitting the 158s (and other DMU classes) with Anti-Spall windscreens, as fitted to HSTs & other more modern vehicles. Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: Sprog on September 13, 2008, 15:05:19 Re. The attack on 158956 Interestingly/Oddly, i have since read that in fact, when attacked the cab that had its windows smashed was actually trailing (ie, on the rear of the train) & that the train was subsequently terminated at Southampton Central the driven back ECS to SPM (instead of being reversed so it could be driven from the 'good cab', then go ECS to SPM via Chandlers Ford.
The 'smashed' cab was facing towards the West while it was being worked on at SPM, which means that both 'happenings' are possible, but can anyone shed any light on what actually happened? The hole in that windscreen was mighty big for one that was apparently caused by an object hitting it while the unit was heading away from the point of origin (aka, hands of oxgen wasters) My report of things came from a mixture of word of mouth from Team Leaders who had spoken to Control, TRUST incident log/delay attribution report and the BTP who attended to take statements & gather evidence etc. Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: Sprog on September 14, 2008, 22:15:12 158950 has also gone to Wabtec Eastleigh for re-work. 158950 is formed of 158761, which was the first 158 to be 'refreshed' & this it was in effect the prototype. It will be brought up to the same standard/specification as the rest of the 158 fleet.
Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: r james on September 14, 2008, 23:14:50 What as different about the prototype 158 refresh on that unit? I thought it just lacked tables on the baks of seats? Anyone know what was significantly different to warrent redoing the whole thing?
Also, anybody know if the prototype HST carraige will ever get redone? I ask, as this is the coach tha has got the red micky mouse ears (grab handle) on the seats, instead of the big pink ones as featured on rest of the fleet. It also has a lot of issues with the underseat power sockets falling loose, and the plastic parts of the arm rests missing the plastic ends I have noticed. Or do we just have to live with this now? Or maybe will be done as part of the work when the new unit arrives? Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: devon_metro on September 15, 2008, 16:38:34 Don't think it has CCTV
Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: smithy on September 15, 2008, 19:45:12 Don't think it has CCTV correct no cctv,old end lights and desk panels plus some other little things that need addressing. Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: devon_metro on September 15, 2008, 19:46:12 The whole fleet could do with being "addressed"!
Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: Sprog on September 15, 2008, 21:20:08 The whole fleet could do with being "addressed"! Sorry?? ??? Please expand on that. Almost the entire FGW fleet has in the last 7/8 months been refreshed & many have recieved a mixture of C4 & C6 exams. We are +3 or 4 DMUs almsot every day now. Just the 150s to finish & the 143s to do now.................. Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: Phil on September 15, 2008, 21:36:13 I think it may be a reference to one of our busiest ever threads on this forum, Sprog - some while before your time on here, admittedly, but easily findable via the search option.
It was hotly debated amongst a number of our readers at that time that the FGW HST refurbishment was arguably the "worst refurb ever". This isn't an opinion that I personally align myself with, I hasten to add. http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=2578.0 Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: devon_metro on September 16, 2008, 13:53:26 I was in fact referring to the state of the 158s externally. The front end for example. I appreciate the yellow surrounds around the light may wear off, but the half coated finish as many of them are looks awful!
Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: smithy on September 16, 2008, 15:35:46 I was in fact referring to the state of the 158s externally. The front end for example. I appreciate the yellow surrounds around the light may wear off, but the half coated finish as many of them are looks awful! correct wabtec painted over the old yellow on screen and light surrounds with black,over time this has worn off making them look tatty. the whole fleet will be having some items addressed that have came to light since refresh Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: The SprinterMeister on September 28, 2008, 10:54:58 I was in fact referring to the state of the 158s externally. The front end for example. I appreciate the yellow surrounds around the light may wear off, but the half coated finish as many of them are looks awful! correct wabtec painted over the old yellow on screen and light surrounds with black,over time this has worn off making them look tatty. the whole fleet will be having some items addressed that have came to light since refresh And hopefully somebody will see the light and fit the Liebherr type airconditioning to the ex TPex sets as well. Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: smithy on September 28, 2008, 17:19:02 I was in fact referring to the state of the 158s externally. The front end for example. I appreciate the yellow surrounds around the light may wear off, but the half coated finish as many of them are looks awful! correct wabtec painted over the old yellow on screen and light surrounds with black,over time this has worn off making them look tatty. the whole fleet will be having some items addressed that have came to light since refresh And hopefully somebody will see the light and fit the Liebherr type airconditioning to the ex TPex sets as well. not going to happen fgw think the old system reconditioned is better. if temperature was better then SWT would have kept it on their fleet. Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: r james on September 28, 2008, 17:29:46 Are there plan to correct all of the faults whcih have appeared, which I understand have been covered heavily with duct tape? Surely this is covered by a warranty of the parts?
Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: The SprinterMeister on September 28, 2008, 18:05:31 I was in fact referring to the state of the 158s externally. The front end for example. I appreciate the yellow surrounds around the light may wear off, but the half coated finish as many of them are looks awful! correct wabtec painted over the old yellow on screen and light surrounds with black,over time this has worn off making them look tatty. the whole fleet will be having some items addressed that have came to light since refresh And hopefully somebody will see the light and fit the Liebherr type airconditioning to the ex TPex sets as well. not going to happen fgw think the old system reconditioned is better. if temperature was better then SWT would have kept it on their fleet. It isn't though, thats why SWT did the decent thing and got shot of it and installed Liebherr kit instead. EBAC and Temperature kit is generally speaking as much use as a handbrake on a canoe..... ::) Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: smithy on September 28, 2008, 19:20:13 Are there plan to correct all of the faults whcih have appeared, which I understand have been covered heavily with duct tape? Surely this is covered by a warranty of the parts? all covered by warranty i believe so should get repaired,where is the duct tape? one of my fellow conductors happened to visit spm and get some info about air con repirs and hopefully should be complete ready for next year,just the heating to sort prior to winter now!!!!!!! Title: Re: FGW Fleet Status Post by: Chris from Nailsea on September 28, 2008, 19:33:36 Oh, the heating's working alright, smithy: on my occasional use of a 158 (which turns up sometimes on the 08:59 to BTM), it's been chucking out hot air - since last winter! ??? ::)
This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |