Title: Calls for FGW to lose franchise (merged topics) Post by: Lee on May 12, 2007, 12:44:23 David Drew, Labour & Co-operative MP for Stroud, Gloucestershire put down an Early Day Motion 'FGW Train Services' on 10 May , 2007 calling for FGW to be run in the public sector (link below.)
http://www.rmtbristol.org.uk/2007/05/first_great_western_train_serv.html#more For an alternative view see the link below. http://firstgreatwestern.blogspot.com/2007/05/unfair-dismissal.html Title: Re: David Drew Calls For FGW To Lose Its Franchise Post by: simonw on May 12, 2007, 13:45:40 Interesting point.
I agree that FGW are not fit to run the franchise, but I also believe that the DfT is not fit to run a railway either. It would be good to have a regulator that was obsessed with quality (punctuality, reliability,safety) and service (trains running when and where peaople want them) rather that a meddling government department. Then the franchise operator could concentrate on providing a reliable service, and not be hamstrung by a government that wants ^1.4 billion, to control the number of trains/carriages around teh country. Title: Re: David Drew Calls For FGW To Lose Its Franchise Post by: devon_metro on May 12, 2007, 20:37:25 Its just another way to tax us really without being told. All money, in my opinion made on the railways should go back into the railways.
Title: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: Lee on June 27, 2007, 11:05:39 Rail watchdog London Travelwatch has asked the government to consider terminating FirstGroup's Great Western franchise (links below.)
http://www.rmtbristol.org.uk/2007/06/uk_rail_watchdog_urges_end_of.html#more http://www.rmtbristol.org.uk/2007/06/call_to_end_abysmal_rail_firm.html#more Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: simonw on June 27, 2007, 22:34:50 Another voice of sanity.
It's a shame that enough people did not complain when the worst performing rail company in Britain retained it's own franchise 18 months ago. The only reason that could justify it's retention was by promising to pay the government a rediculous sum of money, and to do this it has cancelled services, lost carriages, reduced the amount of spare/contigency capacity etc. Hence, the bad service we now see. I wonder if the government promised First Group anything as part of this deal that sees FGW pay the government over ^1.1 billion. It's a lot of money for the company with worst rolling stock, and some of the poorest and most congested track to pay for operating a service. Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: Timmer on June 28, 2007, 07:12:16 Another voice of sanity. I think the reason for that was at the time people were resigned to the fact that First was going to retain the GW franchise and gain the Wessex franchise and had no idea just how bad it was going to get despite all the warnings in the press and railway media that there was going to be trouble ahead.It's a shame that enough people did not complain when the worst performing rail company in Britain retained it's own franchise 18 months ago. The only reason that could justify it's retention was by promising to pay the government a rediculous sum of money, and to do this it has cancelled services, lost carriages, reduced the amount of spare/contigency capacity etc. Hence, the bad service we now see. I wonder if the government promised First Group anything as part of this deal that sees FGW pay the government over ^1.1 billion. It's a lot of money for the company with worst rolling stock, and some of the poorest and most congested track to pay for operating a service. There is no doubt in my mind that there is no way the government is going to strip FGW of this franchise because of the ^1.1 billion that is coming their way over the next few years. They had no choice with GNER as they handed back the keys as it were. They will just hold firm that in the end hoping FGW sort themselves out and the cries for it to be stripped of its franchise die down, performance figures go back up and complaints about service go down. Wishful thinking I think. Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: Lee on June 28, 2007, 10:57:51 Here is a further link on this.
http://thisisbath.co.uk/displayNode.jsp?nodeId=163490&command=displayContent&sourceNode=163316&contentPK=17676132&folderPk=89126&pNodeId=163047 Interestingly , First Great Western's sister company , First Avon and Somerset , which provides bus services in the Bath and Bristol area , has escaped being fined by the Government traffic commissioner. A public inquiry had been held to investigate whether the company was meeting its timetable obligations. It found that "there was very little non-compliance in Bath" and that while there were problems elsewhere , steps were being taken to address them. Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: simonw on June 28, 2007, 11:20:37 Interesting article,
"Track, signalling and infrastructure problems had been behind many of the difficulties, she added, and a ^750m repair programme being carried out by the responsible Government company, Network Rail, would help to "dramatically improve" punctuality and performance." What repair programme? I know there are weekend repair works throughout FGW land; is this part of the programme? I thought they where just patching the dilapidated network in this area. Or does Network Rail planning to increase rail capacity adding adding stations, platforms, points. track, etc. ^750M is a lot of money, where is it being spend, and when? Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: Lee on June 28, 2007, 12:30:20 List of projects in the area (Route 13) with cases sufficiently advanced to be considered as approved , and completion dates :
2006 - 2008 : Paddington station - Span 4 roof and platform drainage works 2007 - 2008 : Paddington station - High voltage equipment renewals Kensal Green - Carriage Washing Plant relocation to Old Oak Common Depot Paddington ^ Reading Relief Lines - Linespeed increase Acton - Cutting stabilisation Hayes & Harlington - Station enhancements Maidenhead station - Extension of down main line platform Reading East - Embankment stabilisation Track Renewals - Plain line renewals are planned at Goring (down relief lines), Miskin , Pontyclun , Wickwar , Naas and Pyle Track Renewals - S&C renewals are planned at Foxhall Junction , Swindon West , East & Transfer Bridges , Narroways Hill , Llanwern East , Newport West and Gaer Junction Uffington - Embankment stabilisation Marston West - Embankment stabilisation Swindon station area - Track layout modernisation for the Swindon station area and east Swindon approaches and sidings Swindon PSB - SPT concentrator renewal Chipping Sodbury West - Cutting stabilisation Bristol Parkway station - Provision of a 3rd platform Severn Tunnel East - Cutting stabilisation Newport station - Platform 4 extension Newport PSB - SPT concentrator renewal Llanharan - New station Port Talbot East Area Signalling Renewal (PASR) - Resignalling scheme with track layout modernisation Port Talbot PSB - SPT concentrator renewal Dauntsey Bank - Embankment stabilisation Christian Malford - Embankment stabilisation Saltford Tunnel East - Cutting stabilisation Bristol PSB - SPT concentrator renewal Marsh Junction Depot - Development of the former DMU depot Flax Bourton - Embankment stabilisation Tredington - Embankment stabilisation Charfield Loop - Embankment stabilisation Westerleigh North - Embankment stabilisation Reading Green Park station - New station Honeybourne - Embankment stabilisation Tutshill - Cutting stabilisation Sudbrook - Pumping station Ebbw Valley railway - Convert former freight only line to passenger status with provision of 6 new stations on 18 miles of single line with a 3 mile long passing loop 2008 / 2009 Bourton - Embankment stabilisation Little Somerford - Embankment stabilisation Pilning DGL & UGL - Conversion to passenger status Track Renewals - Plain line renewals are planned at Chipping Sodbury , Severn Tunnel Junction , Hinksey , Wolvercot Junction , Defford , Oddingley & Montpelier Track Renewals - S&C renewals are planned at Old Oak Common , Friars Junction , Hayes & Harlington , Airport Junction , Slough Station East & West , Slough ^ Windsor , Didcot East , Swindon East & Transfer Bridges , Bathampton UPL , Bath Goods , Pilning DGL & UGL , Stoke Works Junction , Yate South & Middle and Charfield Loops Severn Tunnel - Cable hanger route renewal Severn Tunnel - Communication system renewal Severn Tunnel - Telephone concentrator renewal Chippenham - Embankment stabilisation St Annes Park - Cutting stabilisation Patterdown Farm (Thingley) - Embankment stabilisation Worle Junction - Upgrade from single lead to double lead junction and part redoubling of branch towards Weston Milton Tumpey Green - Embankment stabilisation Berkeley South - Embankment stabilisation Perivale - Embankment stabilisation Pound Green - Embankment stabilisation Rodbourne - Embankment stabilisation Purton - Embankment stabilisation Sapperton - Tunnel repairs 2009 / 2010 Westerleigh East - Embankment stabilisation Newport Area Signalling Renewal (NASR) Phase 1 - Resignalling scheme with provision for track and station modernisation Newport station - Station regeneration Cardiff PSB - SPT concentrator renewal Eckington - Embankment stabilisation 2010 / 2011 Severn Tunnel Junction ^ Cardiff - Relief Line speed increases up to 75mph - Main Line speed increases up to 110mph 2012 Cardiff Area Signalling Renewal (CASR) - Resignalling scheme with provision for track layout and station modernisation 2013 Reading Area Signalling Renewal (RASR) - Resignalling scheme: complementing track layout and station modernisation Newport Area Signalling Renewal (NASR) Phase 2 - Resignalling scheme with provision for track layout and station modernisation 2014 Oxford Area Signalling Renewal (OASR) - Resignalling scheme: complementing track layout and station modernisation Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: Lee on July 02, 2007, 16:28:12 CJ Harrison condemns the London Travelwatch statement (link below.)
http://firstgreatwestern.blogspot.com/2007/06/lack-of-conviction.html Title: FOSBR Joins Call To Renationalise Greater Western Franchise Post by: Lee on July 16, 2007, 10:29:25 FOSBR have joined calls from MPs , unions & passenger groups for First Great Western services to be run in the public sector (link below.)
http://www.fosbr.org.uk/news.php?newsid=0000000120 Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: Thomas the Tank Engine on August 21, 2007, 04:51:50 Rail watchdog London Travelwatch has asked the government to consider terminating FirstGroup's Great Western franchise A view echoed by a large proportion of their frontline staff too... Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: Thomas the Tank Engine on August 21, 2007, 04:56:12 There is no doubt in my mind that there is no way the government is going to strip FGW of this franchise because of the ^1.1 billion that is coming their way over the next few years. Sadly, that's more or less the state of it. :( Title: Re: London Travelwatch Calls For FGW To Lose Franchise Post by: grahame on August 21, 2007, 07:26:39 Really ... a change in franchise (with all the chaos that would ensue) within the current system might end up just replacing one set of ((top managers and shareholders)) with another heading aloong the same lines. Look and see how much National Express are in the news with regards to probable rises in unregulated fares on the East Coast, and the furrour that Stagecoach have on a similar subject in South West Trains.
We may not like the elements on the system that can put profit before people, shareholders before customers, operational convenience and avoiding penalties before passenger needs ... but changing the gamekeeper isn't going to alter the rules they follow. I would persoanlly still wish to work very much with the people and company we have at the momemt, rather than to object to them to the extent that we can't work with them. This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |