Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => London to the Cotswolds => Topic started by: Btline on June 17, 2008, 19:05:34



Title: AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER
Post by: Btline on June 17, 2008, 19:05:34
The CLUG have finally updated their website. ::) Here is what they have to say.

Quote
AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER.
Way back in 1971, British Rail decided that the service over the Oxford to Worcester line could easily be provided on predominantly single track.  The sections between Wolvercot Junction (near Oxford) and Ascott-under-Wychwood, Moreton-in-Marsh and Evesham and Evesham and Norton Junction (near Worcester) had one track and all intermediate signalling removed.   During the period since 1971, there has been an unprecedented growth in demand for travel over the line, with the result that we now have twice as many trains trying to share the reduced amount of infrastructure.

Ever since the Cotswold Line Promotion Group was formed in 1978, it has been pressing for the reinstatement of at least some of the track removed in 1971, but successive operators have never seen a need to spend the necessary money.  The failure to address this problem has resulted in serious operating difficulties over the route, with knock on delays or even cancellations caused particularly by late running trains. The Group would like to see an hourly off-peak service throughout the day, but, although technically possible, this could compromise punctuality and reliability, given the present infrastructure arrangement.

It was announced at a public meeting in Charlbury on 4th April that Network Rail has now submitted proposals to the Office of Rail Regulation for the re-doubling of the 15 mile single line section between Evesham and Moreton-in-Marsh together with some 5 miles of the Ascott-under-Wychwood to Wolvercot Junction single line to a point a mile or so east of Charlbury.

If implemented, this would just leave two single track sections between Oxford and Worcester, both some 8 to 9 miles in length and would considerably improve the flexibility of the route.

On 5th June 2008, the Office of Rail Regulation released a 374 page document entitled "Periodic Review 2008: Draft Determinations".  Within its pages, Cotswold Line Re-doubling is given a high priority, although the ORR feels that it could be done for ^3M less than the ^51M costed by Network Rail.

As the CLPG understands it, the scheme still has to receive the final approval of the Secretary of State for Transport.  If this is received, then it is understood that the work will be done in two phases.  Phase 1 will be from Ascott-under-Wychwood to about a mile east of Charlbury.  Phase 2 will be Moreton-in-Marsh to Evesham.  Work on Phase 1 could start as early as January 2009 and, hopefully, be completed in time for the May 2009 timetable changes.

What do people think of the term AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER, is it sensible and safe, or an understatement? ???

But whatever colour, its great news! ;D


Title: Re: AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER
Post by: Btline on June 17, 2008, 19:07:37
A thought - shame "phase 1" is not the long section!


Title: Re: AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER
Post by: willc on June 17, 2008, 19:22:07
Thought this appears to be the reverse of the phasing I had ben told about, if it is phase 1, it's because it's the straightforward section - little track slewing to deal with, except around Charlbury station - and it would provide extra flexibility for any shuttle services out to Moreton during the closure of the section to Evesham.

Double amber is a perfectly reasonable note of caution - as I said in the other thread, the whole Network Rail business plan won't get signed off until October. Yes, the scheme is in there now, it's highly unlikely it would get removed, but until the ink is dry on the paperwork, a fair enough view.


Title: Re: AMBER CHANGES TO DOUBLE AMBER
Post by: TerminalJunkie on June 17, 2008, 22:06:58
Quote from: willc
Double amber is a perfectly reasonable note of caution
But railway signals are yellow, not amber... (http://www.takeforum.com/forum/images/smiles/HSheepsign.gif)



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net