Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Looking forward - the next 5, 10 and 20 years => Topic started by: grahame on March 11, 2025, 07:11:18



Title: A move to longer trains?
Post by: grahame on March 11, 2025, 07:11:18
From Scotrail (https://www.scotrail.co.uk/about-scotrail/news/scotrail-introduce-longer-trains-west-highland-line)

Quote
ScotRail to introduce longer trains on West Highland Line

From tomorrow (Tuesday, 11 March), ScotRail will operate seven-carriage trains between Glasgow and Crianlarich, and five-carriage trains between Crianlarich and Fort William.

The improvements have been made possible due to the completion of platform extension works by Network Rail, which now allow the train operator to make better use of its Highland Explorer carriages. The use of active travel carriages had previously been restricted on services due to platform length limitations.

The Highland Explorer carriages will be used on the following services:

12:22 Glasgow to Fort William.
17:37 from Fort William to Glasgow (starting in Mallaig).

ScotRail will also begin its summer service strengthening tomorrow, earlier than in previous years. Traditionally starting from the last weekend in March, this year summer strengthening will start on 11 March to accommodate increased demand.

After many years of feeling and seeing trains shrinking in general, it's good see some lengthening.   There have been past cases of growing but what we have seen over recent decades has been shorter, though more frequent trains.

Last week, I was on the Kyle line.  In my youth there were 5 trains a day on the line (3 to Kyle and 2 from Kyle) and I can recall wondering if there was a scrapyard at Kyle.  These days there are 8 trains - 4 each way - but they are just two carriages long as against perhaps 4 to 6 in the past.

Is 2 cars enough? For the trains I was on, in my carriages, yes, it was.  But for other services I'm told by staff it can be hard to find a seat.   The "problem" with longer trains, if you like, is that the extra capacity is needed only for a small proportion of trains even if it affects a larger proportion of passengers.

Making trains longer should be cheaper than running more trains, but while frequency remains below a certain quantum, you'll get far, far more growth and passenger on a 2 x 2 car service than a 1 x 4 car service. 



Title: Re: A move to longer trains?
Post by: eightonedee on March 11, 2025, 10:48:33
Don't get too excited, Grahame!

In the case of the West Highland line, this is simply one train a day in each direction will now have one of the converted class 153s (24 extra seats, plus plenty of room for bikes, skis etc.) added. I assume that it is just stations beyond Crianlarich that have been extended where necessary, as south of there (if its anything like the service I used a few years ago) some of the trains will be 4x2 car units, dividing or joining 2 sets of 2 at Crianlarich when the Oban and Fort William services part or join, some of the Oban trains being 2 units. If I recall correctly, the class 156 units are about 150 seaters, so a 300 (or 450 until Crianlarich) seat train to or from Glasgow gets a modest number of extra seats on one trip a day.

On the Kyle line, my recollection from a trip in 1981 was that the trains were 4 coach trains, consisting of Mk1 corridor stock. The seconds would therefore have each held potentially 64 passengers, 32 in the brake coach, but presumably there was either a first class coach (48 in an open coach, 36 if corridor) or a composite (56), so the nominal capacity of each train was between 166 and 220), whereas a class 158 is (I think) 138. However, outside crowded peak commuting trains, 4 people sitting across the bench seat of a second class Mk 1 compartment was unusual (and not that pleasant!), so it was actually more like 156 to 168. It looks like the capacity has actually increased, but presumably at the eastern end at peak times (Inverness commuters?) the trains struggle with the demand.

Did that last train to Kyle you mention in the old 3 out, 2 back service pattern simply return empty to Inverness? I do though recall getting up very early for my trip from Kyle to Inverness in 1981, joining the workers from the Applecross oilrig yard on the Kyle ferry to get to the station from our holiday accommodation on Skye, so it seems unlikely that there was not a train stabled overnight for this service.


Title: Re: A move to longer trains?
Post by: grahame on March 11, 2025, 12:21:24
It looks like the capacity has actually increased, but presumably at the eastern end at peak times (Inverness commuters?) the trains struggle with the demand.

Ironically not - the struggle is between Kyle of Lochalsh and Dingwall with leisure / tourism traffic, even this early in the year.  Train manager reporting as we returned (I was in front carriage) Duirinish to Plockton that the rear carriage was heaving with a group, and later in the day I came across the same 158 on the Invergordon to Inverness shuttle - its next working - with paper reservation still in place Stromeferry to Inverness.  TM explained that the turn around of the set at Inverness was a tight one and he hadn't had time to remove them.

There are now 13 trains a day inbound from Dingwall to Inverness, three before 9 a.m. and seeing a couple of them come in they had a healthy but not huge number of passengers.    Probably the same outbound - 3 trains in 90 minutes just after 5 p.m. but no personal report from me.


Title: Re: A move to longer trains?
Post by: rogerpatenall on March 12, 2025, 08:25:36
My only trip to Kyle was in the early 1980s, I think, and was. both ways, in the Beaver Tail observation car, added to four Mark 1s.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net