Great Western Coffee Shop

All across the Great Western territory => Across the West => Topic started by: Timmer on June 12, 2008, 19:52:04



Title: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: Timmer on June 12, 2008, 19:52:04
Does anyone know if Pullman Rail are still responsible for refurbing FGW's fleet of 150s?

I was flicking through an old rail magazine the other day that mentioned that the plan was to have them completed by May with the 143s to follow but there are still a fair few un-refurbed sets running around. Aparantly, the plan was to turn each 150 around in 10 days.

Did I read somewhere on this forum that Pullman have lost the contract to do the 143s because they are behind with the 150s?


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: smithy on June 12, 2008, 20:29:23
Does anyone know if Pullman Rail are still responsible for refurbing FGW's fleet of 150s?

I was flicking through an old rail magazine the other day that mentioned that the plan was to have them completed by May with the 143s to follow but there are still a fair few un-refurbed sets running around. Aparantly, the plan was to turn each 150 around in 10 days.

Did I read somewhere on this forum that Pullman have lost the contract to do the 143s because they are behind with the 150s?

correct they are way behind with the 150's and quality of work is poor in comparison to wabtec 158 & 153's,so i am led to believe they have lost 143 work and fgw are bringing it in house.


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: John R on June 12, 2008, 20:45:01
I travelled on a refurbed 150 yesterday, and all the seat numbers were gone around me. Yes that's people doing it, but they shouldn't be able to do it if the quality is good, and it makes the units look uncared for already.


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: r james on June 13, 2008, 00:14:10
So who will do the 143s?


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: Graz on June 13, 2008, 09:07:49
That's interesting, I never realised a different company refurbished the 150s. Though 153s/158s are fairly similar in seating, carpets etc so that might explain it. I think there's a bit too much pink in the refurbished 150s personally!

Interesting to see what the 143s will look like.


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: smithy on June 13, 2008, 09:42:16
That's interesting, I never realised a different company refurbished the 150s. Though 153s/158s are fairly similar in seating, carpets etc so that might explain it. I think there's a bit too much pink in the refurbished 150s personally!

Interesting to see what the 143s will look like.

expect the 143's to be very similar with all the blue and pink interior panels,with the same type of seats as 150's and probably the same floor covering as 150's aswell.
exterior will be the same blue vinyl with dynamic lines made up of place names.

rumour has it they are being done at an old rail depot in the exmouth area that fgw are looking to take on and man to do the work?


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: Graz on June 13, 2008, 10:59:54
Ah, thanks for that. Wonder if they will add armrests? That's one thing I miss whenever I'm in a 143.


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: devon_metro on June 13, 2008, 11:07:02
I travelled on a refurbed 150 yesterday, and all the seat numbers were gone around me. Yes that's people doing it, but they shouldn't be able to do it if the quality is good, and it makes the units look uncared for already.

Its only a sticker!


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: 12hoursunday on June 13, 2008, 12:52:40

exterior will be the same blue vinyl with dynamic lines made up of place names.



Which is correctly known to be as the "LOCAL LINES" livery


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: r james on June 13, 2008, 14:04:29
Why do FGW want to do the work themselves?  Surely the work will never be to a standard as good as what a proper rail company could do?

And wont it cost a lot more?

And as for the missing stickers, surely they can be altered easily? 


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: devon_metro on June 13, 2008, 14:24:55
I'd say SPM are fairly capable themselves. Just look at what Exeter have managed to do with the 142s!

143s only involves new cab seats, new seat covers, new light clusters and repainting of panels and toilet improvements.


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: 12hoursunday on June 14, 2008, 02:54:16
  Surely the work will never be to a standard as good as what a proper rail company could do?





HOW RUDE!! First Great Western are a proper rail company ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: swlines on June 14, 2008, 02:55:34
I think you might be mistaken there, they run trams (HSTs) and buses (142s).... therefore they are a road based transport company.... ;)


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: Super Guard on June 14, 2008, 09:47:05
What does that make XC then?  ;D


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: r james on June 14, 2008, 16:43:06
You know what i meant, a proper rail refurb company!!




Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: smithy on June 14, 2008, 19:34:03
You know what i meant, a proper rail refurb company!!




that counts pullman out then they are a bunch of cowboys.

fgw will do a decent job,as said just look at the 142's that were done on a very small budget.the 143's are not on short lease so there is more money available for them.


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: r james on June 14, 2008, 20:26:11
Why did FGW choose Pullman rail in the first place then?

What company do ATW use to refurb their trains internally when it happens?


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: Sprog on June 20, 2008, 00:57:23
Why did FGW choose Pullman rail in the first place then?

What company do ATW use to refurb their trains internally when it happens?

Pullmans tendered. Pullmans won. Just like any other contract.

Unfortunately, they have fallen behind on the 150s and so will not get the 143 contract.


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: smithy on June 20, 2008, 20:22:34
Why did FGW choose Pullman rail in the first place then?

What company do ATW use to refurb their trains internally when it happens?

ews barton hill last time


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: r james on June 20, 2008, 22:04:56
The Arriva units arent exactly the best job ive seen.  Though the recent refurbs arent bad, just a shame they are with FGW! 


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 20, 2008, 22:55:15
Welcome to the coffee shop forum, Sprog!  :D


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: vacman on June 21, 2008, 17:39:17
There is also a rumour that FGW are looking to do the refurbs at St Blazey, although this hasn't come from my usual reliable source.


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: dog box on June 21, 2008, 20:16:52
The Arriva units arent exactly the best job ive seen.  Though the recent refurbs arent bad, just a shame they are with FGW! 
bit of an understatement ...splash of puce yuk green and some seat covers which look like an all terrain forklift have drove over them and thats your lot


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: Chris from Nailsea on June 21, 2008, 20:25:47
Hmmm.  I have to say, I do agree with you, dog box: a couple of them have turned up at BTM recently, and I've been startled by their rather bizarre colour scheme!

C.  ::) ;D


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: smithy on June 21, 2008, 20:32:09
There is also a rumour that FGW are looking to do the refurbs at St Blazey, although this hasn't come from my usual reliable source.

i heard a rumour about them using an old works near exmouth junction,not confirmed but it was from a good source apparently some top engineering managers have been checking out the site.

maybe someone from the devon area is able to give some info of what exactly is at exmouth junction?


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: TerminalJunkie on June 21, 2008, 21:10:55
Quote from: smithy
maybe someone from the devon area is able to give some info of what exactly is at exmouth junction?

Sidings, mostly. If you have Google Earth: Exmouth Junction Signal Box (http://ndrailusers.wikispaces.com/space/showimage/Exmouth+Junction+Signalbox.kmz)


Title: Re: FGW 150 Refresh
Post by: devon_metro on June 22, 2008, 11:11:37
Nothing capable of refurbishing a fleet of trains. Network Rail recently sold a lot of the land to property developers.



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net