Great Western Coffee Shop

Journey by Journey => London to the Cotswolds => Topic started by: Witham Bobby on February 12, 2025, 14:16:14



Title: "Old Worse and Worse"
Post by: Witham Bobby on February 12, 2025, 14:16:14
The service between London and Worcester/Hereford truly lives up to its Old Worse and Worse name

Looking at the almost 10% cancellation rate in the most recent figures.  This compares unfavourably with the "average" amongst the so-called high-speed services of 7.7%, which is itself, very high

I think the figure for cancellations doesn't tell the whole truth, either.  If you're waiting at Evesham to go to London, but GWR decide to start that train from Oxford that day, and not from Worcester, as far as you are concerned on the freezing platform, your train is 100% cancelled.  It doesn't show-up in the figures, though.  I don't think it would even count as a cancellation if a train starting at Worcester Foregate Street was amended to run only as far as Shrub Hill.  This has happened a couple of times in the recent past

The GWR figures for 8 December 2024 to 4 January 2025 show that 9.83 of Cotswold line services were cancelled, and a measly 52% of them ran on time


Title: Re: "Old Worse and Worse"
Post by: IndustryInsider on February 12, 2025, 21:23:57
I think the figure for cancellations doesn't tell the whole truth, either.  If you're waiting at Evesham to go to London, but GWR decide to start that train from Oxford that day, and not from Worcester, as far as you are concerned on the freezing platform, your train is 100% cancelled.  It doesn't show-up in the figures, though.  I don't think it would even count as a cancellation if a train starting at Worcester Foregate Street was amended to run only as far as Shrub Hill.  This has happened a couple of times in the recent past

I don’t think that’s right.  AFAIK they are still using the following methodology:

A train is classed as fully cancelled if it didn’t run at all, or completed less than half of its journey length.

A train is ‘part cancelled’ if it ran at least half but not all of its planned journey length, or it missed one or more stations in its planned calling pattern.

So, the figures are actually better than they look…though still pretty awful!


Title: Re: "Old Worse and Worse"
Post by: Richard Fairhurst on February 13, 2025, 10:32:24
It feels that the main issue right now is the late afternoon/evening peak. The morning and daytime services seem to be largely ok (at this end of the line, anyway).



This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net