|
Title: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go Post by: grahame on July 06, 2023, 12:01:45 Our Heritage railway lines, Railtours, other rail based attractions board is not specific in saying where (in the world)
As I posted up (yet another) Irish thread, I found myself what members think of the geographic range for heritage and attraction posts. As I don't know, I'm asking! Do you want to read about the White Pass and Yukon? The Brokken? Irish pedal rail? Leadhills and Wanlockhead? Mangapps Farm? Title: Re: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go Post by: broadgage on July 06, 2023, 16:04:40 I voted for "British isles" but would add the caveat that posts about more distant attractions could be included if exceptionally important/interesting.
Title: Re: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go Post by: GBM on July 06, 2023, 16:35:20 I voted for "British isles" but would add the caveat that posts about more distant attractions could be included if exceptionally important/interesting. Lovely to see you posting again broadgage Title: Re: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go Post by: eXPassenger on July 06, 2023, 21:13:17 I voted for "British isles" but would add the caveat that posts about more distant attractions could be included if exceptionally important/interesting. I agree Title: Re: Heritage and attraction posts - geographically how wide should we go Post by: grahame on July 13, 2023, 15:30:53 Quote South West England and South Wales - 0 (0%) England and Wales - 1 (4.3%) Great Britain (England, Scotland, Wales) - 1 (4.3%) United Kingdom (Great Britain PLUS Northern Ireland) - 1 (4.3%) British Isles (UK + Ireland, Isle of Man, Channel Islands) - 11 (47.8%) Europe - 0 (0%) Worldwide - 9 (39.1%) No real doubt - anything British Isles is fair game. So if I get to Listowel or Ballybunion I can tell you about it. I voted for "British isles" but would add the caveat that posts about more distant attractions could be included if exceptionally important/interesting. Repeated several times ... so I'm inclined to think that the Cass Scenic Railroad (https://mountainrailwv.com/tour/shay-2/) can be included but probably not the Seminole Gulf Railway (https://semgulf.com). Cass, of course, is particularly inclined! This page is printed from the "Coffee Shop" forum at http://gwr.passenger.chat which is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway. Views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that content provided contravenes our posting rules ( see http://railcustomer.info/1761 ). The forum is hosted by Well House Consultants - http://www.wellho.net |